Dnarever wrote on Oct 1
st, 2022 at 11:53pm:
Sorry Grap but you really seem to have this reversed.
Most of the left do tend to backup what they say with reliably sourced material.
Look at most of the things from the right - they are all from conspiracy theory sites and ever Tucker (FOX) etc.
You hardly ever see a righty make a post which is backed by actual fact.
A recent one was someone going on about Tucker, it finished with someone on the left posting the court document to back up the criticism. You will never find that with the right.
Look at the election was stolen BS.
How about Trump stole the documents ? It isn't even a close call there is no excuse but the righties still try to defend it.
I've never defended that.... or countless other things... but there are issues on 'the other side' which are in exactly the same boat ......
Then why am I attacked and insulted as a 'right wing conservative'? Because Lefty and kind think that anything East of Rottnest Island is extreme right wing?
For example - drawing from genuine sources that prior to the Appin Massacre of sixteen Abos, Abos killed fourteen PLUS settlers including several innocent and defenceless women and children, and concluding that means the Abos basically were not the heroes they are claimed to be and were in arms at the time - cannot, under any circumstances be considered 'extreme right'. It's just reality.
Posting links that show a reaction against Trannyism, and showing studies that are indicating a fairly moderate position - that the 'science' around Trannyism is not sufficient to make compelling conclusions - can never be considered to be an extreme 'right wing' event.... unless the viewer is a total lunatic who claims these are all lies (like countless reports of Aboriginal cannibalism) or 'right wing conspiracies' and doesn't give one damn about REAL science (a thing of constant flux, not fixed) as presented, but prefers bombast and bullying to attempt to make his insane point.
Well - bullying doesn't work with me.
I always provide facts unless I am simply playing the Lefty game back to him etc - his kind make baseless assertions (Abo burn-offs would have saved the bush) and claim that is 'science' etc - in his case he blatantly lies about providing links etc to VALID studies - so I respond by providing NO links and just making assertions and put-down the same as he does all the time.
Gets him, eh? At least I don't abuse him as he does me... and I don't say that any link to any VALID study is a lie or a Communist conspiracy to kill my kids... there are simply NO links to valid 'left wing' science in those issues above - and he is not alone in that kind of behaviour here. Each one who supports him in his ranting insanities is the same, though more constrained in their persona here..... you will know which one of those he is when you look at the exact same attitudes and even verbiage tendered by one here in a slightly milder form so as to skate under the radar.... and who stays away while he is ranting and raving and abusing so as to avoid the fallout. Disposable account.
I've never defended that.... or countless other things... but there are issues on 'the other side' which are in exactly the same boat ......
You argue that you are not a righty and I have always agreed with that assessment. So why would you need to defend that? You don't.
There are some on the left who accuse you of being to the right but there are also some on the right who say you are to the left. That puts you in the centre.
That could mean that nobody likes anything you have to say (Joking).
Forum
Pages: 
