polite_gandalf
Gold Member
![*](http://www.ozpolitic.com/yabbfiles/Templates/Forum/default/stargold.gif) ![*](http://www.ozpolitic.com/yabbfiles/Templates/Forum/default/stargold.gif) ![*](http://www.ozpolitic.com/yabbfiles/Templates/Forum/default/stargold.gif) ![*](http://www.ozpolitic.com/yabbfiles/Templates/Forum/default/stargold.gif)
Offline
![](http://static1.businessinsider.com/image/56d75be06e97c621048bb0b5-480/donald-trump.jpg)
Australian Politics
Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender:
|
freediver wrote on Nov 23 rd, 2022 at 7:13am: polite_gandalf wrote on Nov 22 nd, 2022 at 10:25am: freediver wrote on Nov 20 th, 2022 at 10:13am: polite_gandalf wrote on Nov 15 th, 2022 at 2:27pm: FD resorting to personal attacks - because thats literally all he has left. Pathetic.
I am accusing you of flip flopping, like a slippery Muslim, to avoid giving a straight answer. It's not my fault you are a stereotype Gandalf. freediver wrote on Nov 12 th, 2022 at 4:12pm: polite_gandalf wrote on Nov 3 rd, 2022 at 12:44pm: freediver wrote on Oct 23 rd, 2022 at 1:42pm: Like a stereotypical slippery Muslim, when we point out that a person born overseas has no automatic rights to citizenship, Gandalf pretends we are talking about people who were forced to leave the country against their will, and when we point out that no-one was dragged out of the country against their will, Gandalf pretends we are talking about an unborn fetus. How do you think your antics reflect on Islam and your fellow Muslims Gandalf? Do you think it makes people consider you trustworthy? polite_gandalf wrote on Oct 18 th, 2022 at 2:15pm: freediver wrote on Oct 18 th, 2022 at 12:22pm: Quote:Quite an achievement for an unborn fetus wouldn't you say? Unborn fetus's have no rights to citizenship under any law. Nor are they capable of making decisions like voluntarily leaving one country for another - as you claimed. Also, they do have rights to citizenship when they are born. And they have been born FD. You are not actually that stupid Gandalf. I responded on the unborn fetus separately. Try again: We didn't dump them. They left voluntarily. Who, by the way, do you think we "dumped"? And don't pretend I am talking about people who did not exist. As for the unborn fetus, what citizenship rights do you think an unborn fetus has? Silly FD. We are talking about repatriating not just the adults, but also their children - many of whom were not born until after their parents left Australia - agreed? Despite the fact that these children had absolutely no say in the foolish decision of their parents, you still pretend that these children "chose" to leave Australia - like their parents (by making no distinction between the two whatsoever)- thus justifying your BS claim that they should be denied. I take the view that unborn fetuses should not be blamed for the decisions of their parents. Radical, I know. Either way, you still haven't answered the obvious dilemma I presented - if they're not Australia's problem - whose are they? Keeping in mind that the "state" they left to join no longer exists. And you flip flop between them all like a slippery Muslim. You think children should be punished for the crimes of their parents. Fact. You said "no-one was dragged out of the country against their will" - even though we are talking about children who were not even born at the time. Fact. You keep changing your mind about what we are talking about Gandalf. You are playing the stereotype of the slippery Muslim, unable to stick to the one point for more than one response, just keep changing the topic and going round in circles. My topic has been children FD - and how they deserve us to take responsibility for them. This hasn't changed. You on the other hand have difficulty reconciling your stance that "no one was dragged out of the country against their will" - as some moral justification for punishing them - with the fact that the people in question weren't even born at the time - and obviously didn't have a choice in the matter. I have also put it to you - in several different ways - that there is no other country except Australia to blame for them ending up where they did - and therefore no other country who has moral (not to mention legal) responsibility for them. You, in typical FD fashion, just continue to tapdance away from this inconvenient fact. You love to say "not our problem" - but fail to say whose problem they should be. At least Frank had a go at it.
|