Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Poll closed Poll
Question: Will the referendum be voted in?
*** This poll has now closed ***


No    
  42 (75.0%)
Yes    
  14 (25.0%)




Total votes: 56
« Last Modified by: Redmond Neck on: Feb 25th, 2023 at 11:17am »

Pages: 1 ... 38 39 40 41 42 ... 298
Send Topic Print
The Aboriginal Voice referendum (Read 91945 times)
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 83852
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #585 - Jan 21st, 2023 at 12:41pm
 
                                                                         ... bring on the glitch, boys, we've got a live one trying to annoy people.... give 'im hell .....
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 44785
Gender: male
Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #586 - Jan 24th, 2023 at 8:16am
 
Under the Greens policy, the state would go to a referendum to create dedicated seats for First Nations people in both houses of the NSW parliament.

How many seats would be set aside, how electorates would be divided and the model for the election, as well as a First Nations electoral roll, would be recommended by the treaty commission the party also wants established.


....


But Thorpe, who will attend the launch event on Tuesday, has called the referendum a “waste of money” and a “wasted exercise”. She has said she wanted treaty-making and truth-telling to be the priority before the voice was legislated.

Thorpe supports the First Nations advisory group the Blak Greens, which says the treaty is more important.

The group was also leading the NSW branch on its policy, Greens justice spokesperson Sue Higginson said.

“It is well past time for a truth-telling and a treaty process to be established so that all of us can be part of righting the ongoing injustice against Aboriginal people,” she said.

“The Greens, led by Blak Greens, will work to make this happen.”

Coe said she wanted to see progress on “all elements” of the Uluru statement including the voice.
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/jan/24/nsw-greens-to-push-for-dedicated-first-nations-seats-in-parliament-truth-telling-and-treaty-processes




Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12520
Gender: male
Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #587 - Jan 24th, 2023 at 10:12am
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Jan 21st, 2023 at 12:39pm:
Yeah - stuff the will of the people he serves... they need to be put in their proper place of subservience and do what they're told.


The will of the people is to close the gap. How to do it is not understood.

Quote:
  A typical neo-Fascist of the 'left', and just as stupid


So says the deluded 'individual sovereignty' ideologue who thinks law should be based on self-interested freedom, instead of collective well-being.

Just to let you know,  fascists are RW:

"Opposed to anarchism, democracy, pluralism, liberalism, socialism and Marxism, fascism is placed on the far-right wing within the traditional left–right spectrum.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12520
Gender: male
Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #588 - Jan 24th, 2023 at 10:21am
 
Frank wrote on Jan 24th, 2023 at 8:16am:
But Thorpe, who will attend the launch event on Tuesday, has called the referendum a “waste of money” and a “wasted exercise”. She has said she wanted treaty-making and truth-telling to be the priority before the voice was legislated.


And what will her "truth-telling" be?

That blacks can "walk in both worlds"?

Quote:
Thorpe supports the First Nations advisory group the Blak Greens, which says the treaty is more important.

The group was also leading the NSW branch on its policy, Greens justice spokesperson Sue Higginson said.


Like Price, none of them are facing up to the problem of welfare dependency.

Whereas Alan Kohler has correctly identified the problem is an economic, as well as a moral issue which has to be solved.

Quote:
“It is well past time for a truth-telling and a treaty process to be established so that all of us can be part of righting the ongoing injustice against Aboriginal people,” she said.

“The Greens, led by Blak Greens, will work to make this happen.”
 

...which will only deal with the moral issues, not the economic ones.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12520
Gender: male
Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #589 - Jan 24th, 2023 at 10:21am
 
>
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Captain Nemo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 9938
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #590 - Jan 24th, 2023 at 10:23am
 
Latest poll is showing about a 60 - 40 vote in favour of "Yes".

However, the yes vote has been dropping a little bit over time and some of the yes vote is a "soft" yes.

Probably will get up at the referendum but may be closer than those in favour thought initially.
Back to top
 

The 2025 election could be a shocker.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 44785
Gender: male
Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #591 - Jan 25th, 2023 at 7:16am
 
The Northern Territory’s Labor Chief Minister says she will not back any “race-based” intervention in besieged Alice Springs, despite the town’s two Aboriginal MPs demanding alcohol bans to curb out-of-control violence and calling the crisis a bigger priority than the voice referendum.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/urgent-cry-from-the-heart-amid-impasse/n...

But a "race-based" amendment of the Constitution is a moral necessity.
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Captain Nemo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 9938
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #592 - Jan 25th, 2023 at 9:30am
 
...

Wink
Back to top
 

The 2025 election could be a shocker.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 83852
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #593 - Jan 25th, 2023 at 11:00am
 
Captain Nemo wrote on Jan 24th, 2023 at 10:23am:
Latest poll is showing about a 60 - 40 vote in favour of "Yes".

However, the yes vote has been dropping a little bit over time and some of the yes vote is a "soft" yes.

Probably will get up at the referendum but may be closer than those in favour thought initially.


Must be some odd poll then - haven't heard a yes yet.
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12520
Gender: male
Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #594 - Jan 25th, 2023 at 11:09am
 
Frank wrote on Jan 25th, 2023 at 7:16am:
The Northern Territory’s Labor Chief Minister says she will not back any “race-based” intervention in besieged Alice Springs, despite the town’s two Aboriginal MPs demanding alcohol bans to curb out-of-control violence and calling the crisis a bigger priority than the voice referendum.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/urgent-cry-from-the-heart-amid-impasse/n...


The Chief Minister is complicit in the current  neoliberal market orthodoxy which determines who and who will not get a job, by the ability to compete in private sector markets.

Hence the massive welfare dependency among blacks in the NT. 

Quote:
But a "race-based" amendment of the Constitution is a moral necessity.


Yes...she is contradictory, for reasons I explained above.

Whereas Alan Koher correctly says the issue is economic as well as moral , ie getting rid of the welfare dependency of an entire group, in this case - blacks.    
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12520
Gender: male
Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #595 - Jan 25th, 2023 at 11:10am
 
>
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 83852
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #596 - Jan 25th, 2023 at 11:42am
 
thegreatdivide wrote on Jan 25th, 2023 at 11:09am:
Frank wrote on Jan 25th, 2023 at 7:16am:
The Northern Territory’s Labor Chief Minister says she will not back any “race-based” intervention in besieged Alice Springs, despite the town’s two Aboriginal MPs demanding alcohol bans to curb out-of-control violence and calling the crisis a bigger priority than the voice referendum.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/urgent-cry-from-the-heart-amid-impasse/n...


The Chief Minister is complicit in the current  neoliberal market orthodoxy which determines who and who will not get a job, by the ability to compete in private sector markets.

Hence the massive welfare dependency among blacks in the NT. 

Quote:
But a "race-based" amendment of the Constitution is a moral necessity.


Yes...she is contradictory, for reasons I explained above.

Whereas Alan Koher correctly says the issue is economic as well as moral , ie getting rid of the welfare dependency of an entire group, in this case - blacks.    


Go for it - remove their fortnightly fix and their rent payments .... find them jobs instead .... maybe they could all earn a good living as orators raving about their disadvantage and such and how everyone else did it to them.

No voice will do that for them... only become another avenue for the same old demands for cargo cult.

Following on from my story - my brother, the opposite of my excellent self - decided early in life that acting like some Abo and saying he was the perpetual victim and should be paid for it etc and all without working for it, was the way to future prosperity.  The fact that he married an Abo woman might be in that, too.... and we possibly have some wood-pile of some kind, though it only shows in the skin and not the DNA test.

Well - his life could easily be a blueprint for the Abo lifestyle up to and including the early death largely due to substance abuse.... he made it to 59 - I'm 73 now and looking towards equaling that ancestor who lived for 109 years.... got too much to straighten youse lot out about before I go... face it - you desperately need me to lead you all out of your social autism.

I cannot possibly be the son of our parents or the brother of that .... don't even share their blood type....
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 83852
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #597 - Jan 25th, 2023 at 11:43am
 
thegreatdivide wrote on Jan 25th, 2023 at 11:10am:
>


That's not how to work The Glitch.... below is a GLITCH!



.

Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 44785
Gender: male
Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #598 - Jan 25th, 2023 at 12:01pm
 
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has dealt his leadership a catastrophic blow on Tuesday when he proved – beyond all reasonable doubt – that Australia does not need a racist clause inserted into the Constitution to listen to Indigenous voices.

Albanese was able to manage this with a quick hop on his private jet, landing in Alice Springs to meet with community leaders and elders, ‘listening to their voices’ and making a decision far quicker than any gene-tested Canberra bureaucracy.

As it turns out, all Parliament needs in order to listen to Indigenous voices is, well, a set of ears. (And maybe a private jet.)

https://www.spectator.com.au/2023/01/albos-alice-alcohol-back-flip/
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12520
Gender: male
Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #599 - Jan 25th, 2023 at 3:35pm
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Jan 25th, 2023 at 11:42am:
Go for it - remove their fortnightly fix and their rent payments .... find them jobs instead .... maybe they could all earn a good living as orators raving about their disadvantage and such and how everyone else did it to them.


well, there is a limitless amount of useful work to be done, and since society's necessities are produced by a small proportion of the population in the modern AI and IT enhanced economy, then govt ought to be acting as employer of last resort.   

Quote:
No voice will do that for them... only become another avenue for the same old demands for cargo cult.


Agreed, but if the voice does get up, then complex issues re culture, sovereignty, welfare dependency, and the role of government, might be more thoroughly examined than would be the case without a more prominent black voice, leading to better outcomes.

Just might .... 

Quote:
Following on from my story -


Fallacy of composition; your personal success does not negate the macro economic reality of involuntary unemployment. 
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 38 39 40 41 42 ... 298
Send Topic Print