Australian Politics Forum - The Aboriginal Voice referendum

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 95304
Gender: male

Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #1170 - Mar 17^th, 2023 at 6:02pm

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 2:09pm:

I've been away from this poo hole for another few weeks or months, I wasn't counting, can anyone fill me in to save 78 pages of bullshit, what are the current lies being used to justify the No vote?

Basically this, dear:

They're tinted.

The old boy doesn't plan to vote in the referendum. He'll be sending his mail vote over to wonderful wonderful Copenhagen at the next erection.

You'll see. If Mette gets back in, it'll be RIGGED! WITCH HUNT! SO UNFAIR!

STOP THE STEAL!

Back to top

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 95304
Gender: male

Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #1171 - Mar 17^th, 2023 at 6:11pm

Frank wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 2:31pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 2:09pm:

I've been away from this poo hole for another few weeks or months, I wasn't counting, can anyone fill me in to save 78 pages of bullshit, what are the current lies being used to justify the No vote?

Is the voice still going to hand Indigenous Australians power over everyone else?

Is it still racism to recognise them and the atrocities done to them in the constitution?

Should we still be sending the army into the Alice to commit genocide against them?

Have y'all moved on from the crap you were spouting back then?

... and in the 78 pages there aren't any better arguments for the Yes case than the bilge and mindless drivel you have just posted.

The old boy has a point, Sad. You might want to rail incoherently and throw a hissy fit.

Add a decent Boong meme for clarity.

Back to top

images__96__003.jpeg (22 KB | 3 )

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 44721
Gender: male

Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #1172 - Mar 17^th, 2023 at 6:14pm

Karnal wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 6:11pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 2:31pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 2:09pm:

I've been away from this poo hole for another few weeks or months, I wasn't counting, can anyone fill me in to save 78 pages of bullshit, what are the current lies being used to justify the No vote?

Is the voice still going to hand Indigenous Australians power over everyone else?

Is it still racism to recognise them and the atrocities done to them in the constitution?

Should we still be sending the army into the Alice to commit genocide against them?

Have y'all moved on from the crap you were spouting back then?

... and in the 78 pages there aren't any better arguments for the Yes case than the bilge and mindless drivel you have just posted.

The old boy has a point, Sad. You might want to rail incoherently and throw a hissy fit.

Add a decent Boong meme for clarity.

That's the calibre of the Yes case.
Paki grimacing.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 95304
Gender: male

Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #1173 - Mar 17^th, 2023 at 6:25pm

Frank wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 6:14pm:

Karnal wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 6:11pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 2:31pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 2:09pm:

I've been away from this poo hole for another few weeks or months, I wasn't counting, can anyone fill me in to save 78 pages of bullshit, what are the current lies being used to justify the No vote?

Is the voice still going to hand Indigenous Australians power over everyone else?

Is it still racism to recognise them and the atrocities done to them in the constitution?

Should we still be sending the army into the Alice to commit genocide against them?

Have y'all moved on from the crap you were spouting back then?

... and in the 78 pages there aren't any better arguments for the Yes case than the bilge and mindless drivel you have just posted.

The old boy has a point, Sad. You might want to rail incoherently and throw a hissy fit.

Add a decent Boong meme for clarity.

That's the calibre of the Yes case.
Paki grimacing.

I'll be gwimacing on ewection day, old boy.

Would you like to take a dump?

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 44721
Gender: male

Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #1174 - Mar 17^th, 2023 at 6:32pm

Karnal wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 6:25pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 6:14pm:

Karnal wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 6:11pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 2:31pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 2:09pm:

I've been away from this poo hole for another few weeks or months, I wasn't counting, can anyone fill me in to save 78 pages of bullshit, what are the current lies being used to justify the No vote?

Is the voice still going to hand Indigenous Australians power over everyone else?

Is it still racism to recognise them and the atrocities done to them in the constitution?

Should we still be sending the army into the Alice to commit genocide against them?

Have y'all moved on from the crap you were spouting back then?

... and in the 78 pages there aren't any better arguments for the Yes case than the bilge and mindless drivel you have just posted.

The old boy has a point, Sad. You might want to rail incoherently and throw a hissy fit.

Add a decent Boong meme for clarity.

That's the calibre of the Yes case.
Paki grimacing.

I'll be gwimacing on ewection day, old boy.

Would you like to take a dump?

Would you - could you? - make a coherent case for Yes?

There have been many coherent cases for No. The response to most has been, 'oh, that's wacist'.

If this whole Voice referendum is REDUCED to who is and is not a wacist it will tear Australia apart, no matter which way it goes.

Your aim, wee paki bugger.

Back to top

« Last Edit: Mar 17^th, 2023 at 7:58pm by Frank »

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 95304
Gender: male

Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #1175 - Mar 17^th, 2023 at 6:35pm

Frank wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 6:32pm:

YiuKarnal wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 6:25pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 6:14pm:

Karnal wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 6:11pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 2:31pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 2:09pm:

I've been away from this poo hole for another few weeks or months, I wasn't counting, can anyone fill me in to save 78 pages of bullshit, what are the current lies being used to justify the No vote?

Is the voice still going to hand Indigenous Australians power over everyone else?

Is it still racism to recognise them and the atrocities done to them in the constitution?

Should we still be sending the army into the Alice to commit genocide against them?

Have y'all moved on from the crap you were spouting back then?

... and in the 78 pages there aren't any better arguments for the Yes case than the bilge and mindless drivel you have just posted.

The old boy has a point, Sad. You might want to rail incoherently and throw a hissy fit.

Add a decent Boong meme for clarity.

That's the calibre of the Yes case.
Paki grimacing.

I'll be gwimacing on ewection day, old boy.

Would you like to take a dump?

Would you - could you? - make a coherent case for Yes?

There have been many coherent cases for No. The response to most has been, 'oh, that's wacist'.

If this whole Voice referendum is REDUCED to who is and is not a wacist it will tear Australia apart, no matter which way it goes.

Your aim, wee paki bugger.

No worries, we'll ask you then. Are you, in actual fact, a naughty old wacist?

Back to top

IP Logged

Gnads

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 29297
Gender: male

Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #1176 - Mar 17^th, 2023 at 6:41pm

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 2:09pm:

I've been away from this poo hole for another few weeks or months, I wasn't counting, can anyone fill me in to save 78 pages of bullshit, what are the current lies being used to justify the No vote?

Is the voice still going to hand Indigenous Australians power over everyone else?

Is it still racism to recognise them and the atrocities done to them in the constitution?

Should we still be sending the army into the Alice to commit genocide against them?

Have y'all moved on from the crap you were spouting back then?

Pack your bags &

f

uc

k

back off.

There is no logical & sane reason to vote for a constitutional amendment based on race.... period!

You are just another led by the nose softcock without a real clue.

Back to top

« Last Edit: Mar 18^th, 2023 at 7:37am by Gnads »

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 95304
Gender: male

Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #1177 - Mar 17^th, 2023 at 6:45pm

Gnads wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 6:41pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 2:09pm:

I've been away from this poo hole for another few weeks or months, I wasn't counting, can anyone fill me in to save 78 pages of bullshit, what are the current lies being used to justify the No vote?

Is the voice still going to hand Indigenous Australians power over everyone else?

Is it still racism to recognise them and the atrocities done to them in the constitution?

Should we still be sending the army into the Alice to commit genocide against them?

Have y'all moved on from the crap you were spouting back then?

Pack your bags &

f

uc

k

back off.

There is no logical & sane reason to vote for a constitutional amendment based on race.... period!

You are just another lead by the nose softcock without a real clue.

And we'll ask you. Are you, Gonads, a naughty old wacist?

It sounded like you were wavering last time we discussed this.

Back to top

IP Logged

aquascoot

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 34378
Gender: male

Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #1178 - Mar 17^th, 2023 at 6:51pm

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 2:09pm:

I've been away from this poo hole for another few weeks or months, I wasn't counting, can anyone fill me in to save 78 pages of bullshit, what are the current lies being used to justify the No vote?

Is the voice still going to hand Indigenous Australians power over everyone else?

Is it still racism to recognise them and the atrocities done to them in the constitution?

Should we still be sending the army into the Alice to commit genocide against them?

Have y'all moved on from the crap you were spouting back then?

oh diddums.

have you come back to announce what a good person you are.

how cute

Back to top

IP Logged

Grappler Truth Teller Feller

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 83835
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male

Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #1179 - Mar 17^th, 2023 at 7:27pm

Frank wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 6:32pm:

YiuKarnal wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 6:25pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 6:14pm:

Karnal wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 6:11pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 2:31pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 2:09pm:

I've been away from this poo hole for another few weeks or months, I wasn't counting, can anyone fill me in to save 78 pages of bullshit, what are the current lies being used to justify the No vote?

Is the voice still going to hand Indigenous Australians power over everyone else?

Is it still racism to recognise them and the atrocities done to them in the constitution?

Should we still be sending the army into the Alice to commit genocide against them?

Have y'all moved on from the crap you were spouting back then?

... and in the 78 pages there aren't any better arguments for the Yes case than the bilge and mindless drivel you have just posted.

The old boy has a point, Sad. You might want to rail incoherently and throw a hissy fit.

Add a decent Boong meme for clarity.

That's the calibre of the Yes case.
Paki grimacing.

I'll be gwimacing on ewection day, old boy.

Would you like to take a dump?

Would you - could you? - make a coherent case for Yes?

There have been many coherent cases for No. The response to most has been, 'oh, that's wacist'.

If this whole Voice referendum is REDUCED to who is and is not a wacist it will tear Australia apart, no matter which way it goes.

Your aim, wee paki bugger.

well - you know - maybe some places need to be torn apart - you know - Deconstructed - so they can be rebuilt in a proper form.

Been telling yez long time now that Albo will lead Australia into civil war...

Back to top

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams

IP Logged

Grappler Truth Teller Feller

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 83835
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male

Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #1180 - Mar 17^th, 2023 at 7:28pm

Aborigines etc already have all the voice they need same as everyone else.

They already have a higher percentage of representation in Parliament than their percentage representation in the community.

They are already enshrined in the constitution as Australians - same as everyone else.

They also have lobby groups, special representative groups with access to government, and over-representation in the press.

They have the support of Labor, the Greens, the majority of Independents, as well as a number of those on the 'right' side of Parliament.

What the actual powers and functions of any Special Voice are intended to be has not begun to be addressed. The wording is vague, perhaps deliberately so.

Such a voice is racist, discriminatory and exclusionist.

It is not clear if any 'voice' has political voting power in Parliament.

Such a voice body would be an ATSIC or similar that could never be abolished or stood down for corruption etc.

It will achieve nothing that cannot be achieved without it, and at huge and unnecessary cost in money and disturbance of the democratic process

The intent of 'Aboriginal activists' is not to view this as the end result, but as the stepping stone towards the creation of mini-states throughout Australia, all bound by treaty to the Australian Government and funded by the taxpayer and any relevant business wishing to operate there.

It is not simply about 'Aboriginal issues'. Any claim or demand by one group has direct effects on every member of Australia. Similar to 'women's issues' and such these do not exist in a vacuum.

Depending on the model, it could mean permanent seats in Parliament for people who are only voted on by that one group (or groups) – those claiming Aboriginal descent.

To have a separate voice elected only by Aboriginals would mean that the current Aboriginal elected representatives are superfluous and should be stood down.

The claim to have 'never ceded sovereignty', means that elected Aborigines are ineligible to be chosen or to sit in Parliament.

44. Any person who –
(i.) Is under any acknowledgement of allegiance, obedience, or adherence to a foreign power, or is a subject or a citizen or entitled to the rights or privileges of a subject or citizen of a foreign power:

shall be incapable of being chosen or of sitting as a senator or a member of the House of Representatives.

It's a sad kangaroo who can't even REFUTE one thing here.... but prefers crying 'racism' and hurling ad homs like a stroking bonobo...

Back to top

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 44721
Gender: male

Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #1181 - Mar 17^th, 2023 at 8:00pm

Karnal wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 6:35pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 6:32pm:

YiuKarnal wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 6:25pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 6:14pm:

Karnal wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 6:11pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 2:31pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 2:09pm:

I've been away from this poo hole for another few weeks or months, I wasn't counting, can anyone fill me in to save 78 pages of bullshit, what are the current lies being used to justify the No vote?

Is the voice still going to hand Indigenous Australians power over everyone else?

Is it still racism to recognise them and the atrocities done to them in the constitution?

Should we still be sending the army into the Alice to commit genocide against them?

Have y'all moved on from the crap you were spouting back then?

... and in the 78 pages there aren't any better arguments for the Yes case than the bilge and mindless drivel you have just posted.

The old boy has a point, Sad. You might want to rail incoherently and throw a hissy fit.

Add a decent Boong meme for clarity.

That's the calibre of the Yes case.
Paki grimacing.

I'll be gwimacing on ewection day, old boy.

Would you like to take a dump?

Would you - could you? - make a coherent case for Yes?

There have been many coherent cases for No. The response to most has been, 'oh, that's wacist'.

If this whole Voice referendum is REDUCED to who is and is not a wacist it will tear Australia apart, no matter which way it goes.

Your aim, wee paki bugger.

No worries, we'll ask you then. Are you, in actual fact, a naughty old wacist?

Stop writhing, fkkwit.

Would you - could you? - make a coherent case for Yes?

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 95304
Gender: male

Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #1182 - Mar 18^th, 2023 at 12:11am

Frank wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 8:00pm:

Karnal wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 6:35pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 6:32pm:

YiuKarnal wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 6:25pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 6:14pm:

Karnal wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 6:11pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 2:31pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 2:09pm:

I've been away from this poo hole for another few weeks or months, I wasn't counting, can anyone fill me in to save 78 pages of bullshit, what are the current lies being used to justify the No vote?

Is the voice still going to hand Indigenous Australians power over everyone else?

Is it still racism to recognise them and the atrocities done to them in the constitution?

Should we still be sending the army into the Alice to commit genocide against them?

Have y'all moved on from the crap you were spouting back then?

... and in the 78 pages there aren't any better arguments for the Yes case than the bilge and mindless drivel you have just posted.

The old boy has a point, Sad. You might want to rail incoherently and throw a hissy fit.

Add a decent Boong meme for clarity.

That's the calibre of the Yes case.
Paki grimacing.

I'll be gwimacing on ewection day, old boy.

Would you like to take a dump?

Would you - could you? - make a coherent case for Yes?

There have been many coherent cases for No. The response to most has been, 'oh, that's wacist'.

If this whole Voice referendum is REDUCED to who is and is not a wacist it will tear Australia apart, no matter which way it goes.

Your aim, wee paki bugger.

No worries, we'll ask you then. Are you, in actual fact, a naughty old wacist?

Stop writhing, fkkwit.

Would you - could you? - make a coherent case for Yes?

No answer. We'll ask again. Are you, old boy, a card-carrying wacist?

A simple yes or no will suffice. If you want to deny it, just say.

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 44721
Gender: male

Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #1183 - Mar 18^th, 2023 at 7:07am

Karnal wrote on Mar 18^th, 2023 at 12:11am:

Frank wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 8:00pm:

Karnal wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 6:35pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 6:32pm:

YiuKarnal wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 6:25pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 6:14pm:

Karnal wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 6:11pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 2:31pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 2:09pm:

I've been away from this poo hole for another few weeks or months, I wasn't counting, can anyone fill me in to save 78 pages of bullshit, what are the current lies being used to justify the No vote?

Is the voice still going to hand Indigenous Australians power over everyone else?

Is it still racism to recognise them and the atrocities done to them in the constitution?

Should we still be sending the army into the Alice to commit genocide against them?

Have y'all moved on from the crap you were spouting back then?

... and in the 78 pages there aren't any better arguments for the Yes case than the bilge and mindless drivel you have just posted.

The old boy has a point, Sad. You might want to rail incoherently and throw a hissy fit.

Add a decent Boong meme for clarity.

That's the calibre of the Yes case.
Paki grimacing.

I'll be gwimacing on ewection day, old boy.

Would you like to take a dump?

Would you - could you? - make a coherent case for Yes?

There have been many coherent cases for No. The response to most has been, 'oh, that's wacist'.

If this whole Voice referendum is REDUCED to who is and is not a wacist it will tear Australia apart, no matter which way it goes.

Your aim, wee paki bugger.

No worries, we'll ask you then. Are you, in actual fact, a naughty old wacist?

Stop writhing, fkkwit.

Would you - could you? - make a coherent case for Yes?

No answer. We'll ask again. Are you, old boy, a card-carrying wacist?

A simple yes or no will suffice. If you want to deny it, just say.

I am against the racist Voice, so no.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Gnads

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 29297
Gender: male

Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #1184 - Mar 18^th, 2023 at 7:39am

Karnal wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 6:45pm:

Gnads wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 6:41pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 2:09pm:

I've been away from this poo hole for another few weeks or months, I wasn't counting, can anyone fill me in to save 78 pages of bullshit, what are the current lies being used to justify the No vote?

Is the voice still going to hand Indigenous Australians power over everyone else?

Is it still racism to recognise them and the atrocities done to them in the constitution?

Should we still be sending the army into the Alice to commit genocide against them?

Have y'all moved on from the crap you were spouting back then?

Pack your bags &

f

uc

k

back off.

There is no logical & sane reason to vote for a constitutional amendment based on race.... period!

You are just another lead by the nose softcock without a real clue.

And we'll ask you. Are you, Gonads, a naughty old wacist?

It sounded like you were wavering last time we discussed this.

And what are you?

I wasn't wavering hello or goodbye to you

Take a pill ... yes?

Back to top

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais

IP Logged

Poll
Question: Will the referendum be voted in?
* This poll has now closed *
No 42 (75.0%) Yes 14 (25.0%) Total votes: 56 « Last Modified by: Redmond Neck on: Feb 25^th, 2023 at 11:17am »