Gnads wrote on Mar 26^th, 2023 at 11:55am:


Indeed, since the adoption of Thatcherite neoliberalism by both parties in the 80s.

But the resulting soaring inequality amidst entrenched poverty has finally caught up with the deplorable RW; they are now unelectable, while Labor is talking about ending privatizations and ending super concessions for the wealthy etc etc., small steps in the right direction (ie back to the Keynesian 'welfare state').

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Mar 26^th, 2023 at 12:02pm:


Well ...with housing ownership rates falling, the 'millennials' are becoming restive, that's one reason why the Coalition was turfed out last night.

Now..... the polies who can promise to oversee an increase in public housing and/or housing ownership will obviously find favour with the electorate and hence assist in avoiding civil war. [You should have heard Trump in full demagogic flight this morning - blaming "communists" for turning America into a "3rd world banana republic"...correct description of the reality, but incorrect assignation of cause]. 

Quote:


Impractical.

Quote:


How?

Quote:


Hyperbole; wanting a voice is not declaring war, though the voice misses the real cause of the gap ie economic issues and excessive commitment to 'culture'.


Quote:


The poverty industry is a major culprit behind the gap and associated social dysfunction.

SA becomes first Australian jurisdiction to create First Nations Voice to Parliament as historic bill passes

Frank wrote on Mar 26^th, 2023 at 1:33pm:



And THAT is the entire point.... an advisory only body does not need to be enshrined in the Constitution.

Oh, dearie, dearie, me, then we have ATSIC and its sorry history...   

So WHEN it is clear it is not doing its job - you want it to remain forever and require another referendum to get rid of it?  A government must retain the absolute right to disband or remove a body created by government fiat that is clearly not doing its appointed job or is causing far too much trouble or is misbehaving.

No thanks.

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 26^th, 2023 at 8:13pm:

You ARE a mindless moron, cockwomble, that's your role in life. Keep it up, we NEED to see what moron looks like - an eternal reminder.



Successors
Ministerial Taskforce on Indigenous Affairs

On 28 May 2004 the Ministerial Taskforce on Indigenous Affairs (MTF) was established for the purpose of "driving the delivery of improved services and outcomes for Indigenous Australians".[12] It was chaired by Mal Brough, Minister for Families, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs and Minister Assisting the Prime Minister for Indigenous Affairs.[13]

Office of Indigenous Policy Coordination

Main article: Office of Indigenous Policy Coordination
The Office of Indigenous Policy Coordination was created within the Department of Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs on 1 July 2004 "to coordinate and drive the Government's new arrangements in Indigenous affairs",[14] and took on ATSIC's responsibilities upon its abolition. Following machinery of government changes, that office was transferred to the Department of Families, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs on 27 January 2006.[15]

National Indigenous Council

Main article: National Indigenous Council
On 6 November 2004 a government-appointed advisory body, the National Indigenous Council, was announced by the former Minister for Indigenous Affairs, Senator Vanstone, who said that the National Indigenous Council would "provide expert advice to the Australian Government on policy, program and service-delivery issues affecting Aboriginal people and Torres Strait Islanders". It would act as an advisory body only, to support the work of the Ministerial Taskforce on Indigenous Affairs.[16]

At the time the government announced its dismantling, Bob Collins, who had served in the Hawke ministry when ATSIC was established, said that the organisation had let down Indigenous people by deciding that "looking after Geoff Clark was more important than looking after ATSIC".[8]

Following an Inquiry, the 2005 report by its Select Committee said that while there had been widespread support for instituting changes to the way that ATSIC was structured as well as how it operates, there was also "overwhelming" support for the continued existence of a national Indigenous representative body. Most witnesses had suggested that regional operations could be improved, but they were strongly in favour of having a national, elected Indigenous representative body. Deep concerns were expressed about the disempowerment of Indigenous peoples. One of the recommendations was that the government "give active support and funding to the formation of a national Indigenous elected representative body, and provide it with ongoing funding".[17]

The dismantling of ATSIC was seen by many commentators as harmful to Aboriginal people in Australia.[18] In 2009, Lowitja O'Donoghue expressed her opinion that reform of the agency would have been better than establishing a new agency which has been costly and might suffer similar problems as its predecessor, such as nepotism.[19]

ATSIC was criticised by a government advisory panel in 2009 for having been dominated by males.[20]