analysis How does the Liberal Party's Voice policy stack up against the proposed referendum?

Peter Dutton accused of taking Voice to Parliament feedback 'out of context', Matty is the otherone doing that.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   

What a bunch of emotional blackmailing arseholes... Albanese, Noel Pearson, Marcia Langton are...

Pearsons meds must be affecting him badly...

crapping on with tripe like .... "I couldn't sleep last night... having terrible dreams 

Likening Peter Dutton to an undertaker & a Judas.

Which was repeated like a parrot by Albanese afterwards when he fronted a press conference.

You should vote yes to feel better about yourself?

You have to be joking?

You know it's all about the "vibe".

Bunch of over emotional tantrum throwing rats.

Perfect examples of why this unexplained constitutionally enshrined Voice referendum should be voted down .... Vote NO!!!!!

Even idiot Bwyan is posting articles that prove beyond doubt that Aboriginal Australians have many voices to State & Federal Govt already.

Who's not listening? I'd say all those pushing the yes case to divide this country by colour & race.

Vilifying people for making a choice to vote No is the lowest of the low.

UnSubRocky wrote on Apr 6^th, 2023 at 4:12pm:



Wyatt was the first indigenous cabinet minister in a federal government and is widely respected.

Yet his former colleagues say he never once advocated as Indigenous Affairs minister for the model now on offer.

...

The tone of the debate has quickly taken a turn. And some of it is straight out the activist handbook, which favours playing the person rather than the ball.

Now that the political divisions have been set, the debate is becoming less a discussion of principle, the wording of the proposal or the function of the voice but one driven by personal attack.

The danger for Albanese and the Yes campaign is that any Australian who has reasonable doubts about the voice might take what is being thrown at Dutton as having a crack at them as well.
The Liberal leader clearly believes that there are fundamental features that might move the dial toward a No vote.

Most people don’t even know what the voice to parliament is. Many may not even realise it involves changing the constitution.

Those two things are what the Liberal Party believes will give people pause for thought.

A lack of understanding of what the voice actually is and how it will operate, combined with a claim that the debate is confined to the political elite.

Simon Benson

John Smith wrote on Apr 7^th, 2023 at 7:23am:



Phuk off fool.

John Smith wrote on Apr 7^th, 2023 at 8:51am:


You're abuse of tired clichés makes me bilious.

Boris wrote on Apr 7^th, 2023 at 8:27am:


That is the aim of it - the welcome to country sht is just part of the softening up process to let you know, in advance of the Invasion, that you are not a full citizen/resident/owner of your own country but must be welcomed to it as a guest only and subject to being ordered out at whim of the owners.

I have a very finely tuned built-in bullshitometer.... it's off the scales over all this bullsht...