UnSubRocky wrote on May 27
th, 2023 at 9:37am:
I felt like I just read an autoresponder message.
That's because the blind 'individual sovereignty'/ 'freedom values' brain can't cope with macroeconomic realities; that's why you can't understand the
fallacy of composition. Quote:My point was that a 17-year-old girl/woman,.....
I know what your point was - and it's irrelevant to the reality of employment/unemployment stats.
Quote:So, when you had earlier stated that we should be funding indigenous communities to not fall into impoverishment -- I know these are not your words -- I figure that there is some credibility there.
Good; indeed that's what most people who support the Yes case think - without understanding HOW to reverse the current egregious impoverishment measured by the gap stats.
Quote:But, I do not see how urban indigenous Australians, having the services and privileges afforded to every other Australian, need to have extra funding that leaves them to not contribute to the construction of Australia.
I agree that should not be the case, if it were true.
But it's not; urban blacks also suffer higher rates of unemployment and non-participation in paid work.
And if they are getting paid more NOT to work (as you asserted), that is the fault of the system, not the blacks.
[It would be interesting to know the relative contribution of
urban versus regional/remote blacks, to the awful gap stats.]