Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Poll closed Poll
Question: Will the referendum be voted in?
*** This poll has now closed ***


No    
  42 (75.0%)
Yes    
  14 (25.0%)




Total votes: 56
« Last Modified by: Redmond Neck on: Feb 25th, 2023 at 11:17am »

Pages: 1 ... 116 117 118 119 120 ... 298
Send Topic Print
The Aboriginal Voice referendum (Read 90840 times)
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 40938
Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #1755 - May 27th, 2023 at 2:02pm
 
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 83785
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #1756 - May 27th, 2023 at 2:19pm
 
thegreatdivide wrote on May 27th, 2023 at 1:42pm:
UnSubRocky wrote on May 27th, 2023 at 9:37am:
I felt like I just read an autoresponder message.


That's because the blind 'individual sovereignty'/  'freedom values' brain can't cope with macroeconomic realities; that's why you can't understand the fallacy of composition.   

Quote:
My point was that a 17-year-old girl/woman,.....


I know what your point was - and it's irrelevant to the reality of employment/unemployment stats.

Quote:
So, when you had earlier stated that we should be funding indigenous communities to not fall into impoverishment -- I know these are not your words -- I figure that there is some credibility there.



Good; indeed that's what most people who support the Yes case think - without understanding HOW to reverse the current egregious impoverishment measured by the gap stats.

Quote:
But, I do not see how urban indigenous Australians, having the services and privileges afforded to every other Australian, need to have extra funding that leaves them to not contribute to the construction of Australia.


I agree that should not be the case, if it were true.

But it's not; urban blacks also suffer higher rates of unemployment and non-participation in paid work. 

And if they are getting paid more NOT to work (as you asserted), that is the fault of the system, not the blacks.

[It would be interesting to know the relative contribution of urban versus regional/remote blacks,  to the awful gap stats.]



Still no answer as to HOW you're going to change anything.... railing at the current economic system isn't doing it...
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
UnSubRocky
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Crocodile Hunter: Origins

Posts: 24613
Rockhampton
Gender: male
Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #1757 - May 27th, 2023 at 2:38pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on May 27th, 2023 at 2:02pm:


I was wondering what date the referendum was held. I thought this month was the month for the anniversary Kevin Rudd apologised and accepted responsibility for the plight of indigenous Australians. But, that was back in February of the year 2008.
Back to top
 

At this stage...
WWW  
IP Logged
 
JC Denton
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 5470
Gender: female
Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #1758 - May 27th, 2023 at 4:31pm
 
i want abo self-determination

basically anything that gets them as far away from me as humanly possible
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 83785
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #1759 - May 27th, 2023 at 5:37pm
 
UnSubRocky wrote on May 27th, 2023 at 2:38pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 27th, 2023 at 2:02pm:


I was wondering what date the referendum was held. I thought this month was the month for the anniversary Kevin Rudd apologised and accepted responsibility for the plight of indigenous Australians. But, that was back in February of the year 2008.


Their calendar is different.... astronomy you know....
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Gnads
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 29287
Gender: male
Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #1760 - May 28th, 2023 at 9:55am
 
Quote:
Welcome to Country – Bess Price
A former indigenous politician
who received a prestigious award from Barack Obama has described Aboriginal' welcome to country' ceremonies as 'bullshit'.

Quote from former indigenous NT minister Bess Price (mother of Jacinta Price). 'All the "Welcome to Country", all the "Smoking Ceremonies" and all the made up bullshit rituals about "pay our respects to elders past and present" is just one big lie.

The 'welcome to country' was adopted into Australia's parliamentary protocols in 2008, after the then prime minister Kevin Rudd delivered his apology to the stolen generation.

However, two years after that decision Aboriginal entertainer Ernie Dingo claimed that he invented the concept in 1976 when Pacific Island dancers demanded they receive a traditional welcome.

The Aboriginals have supposedly been here for at least 30,000 years (some say more like 60,000 years). That’s about 29,750 years before the British arrived.

The fact is, as uncomfortable and as unfashionable as it is, aboriginal Australia had not produced anything resembling a Shakespeare, nothing much in the way of technology, never discovered the wheel and no philosophy to speak of, in the 30,000 years available to it.
The English brought the rule of law, the Westminster system, the notion of progress and all the benefits of the science, technology and ingenuity of the modern European tradition.

On 26 January 1788 when the First Fleet ships unloaded their 1200 convicts, Royal Marine guards and officials, not a shot was fired. As they looked around what's now Circular Quay they saw nothing other than bush.

Not a single building, planted field, domesticated plant or animal - nothing at all. It was the same across the continent.

It was "terra nullius" - a vacant land.

There was no indigenous Army to defeat in battle, no Aboriginal flag to lower. There was nothing to claim as the spoils of victory.

There was just wild bush. The few Aborigines who came out to have a look at these strange people were completely illiterate and innumerate and those on the south side of the harbor spoke a language completely unintelligible to those on the north side of the harbor and they'd been constantly at war with each other for as long as anyone can remember.

To this day Australian Aboriginal languages consist of around 290-363 dialects belonging to an estimated 28 language families and isolates, spoken by Aboriginal Australians of mainland Australia and a few nearby islands

There was no "invasion".

Since the arrival of the English, only about 250 years ago, Australia has prospered and developed into a modern first world country, along with all other Western democracies.

Yet for at least 30,000 years (prior to the arrival of the British) the Aboriginals seemed to have not progressed one step.

To put this into perspective, the Egyptian empire came and went between around 1570 BC and 1070 BC.

Aboriginals had inhabited our great land for at least 27,000 years prior to the Egyptian empire.

The Greek empire was at its peak in the period 500 BC to 300 BC and the Roman empire was at its peak around 117 BC.

Each of those empires were highly advanced and contributed enormously to the advancement of the modern world.

It therefore beats me why the Aboriginals are now so revered.

55 years ago, under the Holt Liberal government, that 90.77 per cent of Australians voted to remove race from the constitution, putting ‘indigenous’ Australian people on the same legal footing as all other Australians and allowing them to be counted in the Australian population.

It was a momentous shift towards equality.

Half a decade later, the Albanese Labor government wants to insert ‘race’ back into the constitution!

To enshrine a special place in the constitution based purely on racial grounds is racism pure and simple.

Length of time on the continent whether it be 40,000 years, 250 years or 10 years shouldn’t be the determinant for any special consideration to any population cohort in the constitution.

JUST A LITTLE SOMETHING TO CONTEMPLATE BEFORE SIGNING UP TO "THE VOICE” – TAKE CARE - WE ALREADY HAVE A PARLIAMENT THAT REPRESENTS “ALL” AUSTRALIANS!

We are all Australians and should share the same laws and government. Black, brindle or white we voted the government in to act for all Australians irrespective of colour race.


Amen
Back to top
 

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais
 
IP Logged
 
UnSubRocky
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Crocodile Hunter: Origins

Posts: 24613
Rockhampton
Gender: male
Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #1761 - May 28th, 2023 at 10:56am
 
thegreatdivide wrote on May 27th, 2023 at 1:42pm:
UnSubRocky wrote on May 27th, 2023 at 9:37am:
I felt like I just read an autoresponder message.


That's because the blind 'individual sovereignty'/  'freedom values' brain can't cope with macroeconomic realities; that's why you can't understand the fallacy of composition.   


No. It was because you did not make a direct response to what I wrote. I felt like you just had an automated message ready to reply to my post, talking about macroeconomics after I mentioned a 17-year-old girl who avoided poverty by having her racial background allow her family special privileges.

Quote:
I know what your point was - and it's irrelevant to the reality of employment/unemployment stats.


If you had the choice between working 38 hours a week earning $50,000 per year, or staying at home and getting $45,000 a year because of the extras you have as a result of your racial background, you might be happy to give up work life. I work part-time hours and collect partial payment welfare. Both total together as $30,000. If I was told that I could stay home and get $45,000 per year, I would probably ditch my job and get that extra $15,000 a year.

Quote:
Good; indeed that's what most people who support the Yes case think - without understanding HOW to reverse the current egregious impoverishment measured by the gap stats.


The "yes" camp wants to continue the virtue signalling about giving indigenous Australians extra benefits, and feeling sorry for the current generation about their ancestors' mistreatment, etc. It is pass due that we do away with any racially discriminatory treatment and allow government authorities to focus on preventing the creation of an impoverished society -- irrespective of racial background in Australia.

Quote:
urban blacks also suffer higher rates of unemployment and non-participation in paid work.


If they are not participating in paid work, that would deem them to be not trying to get work. And therefore, they are not suffering. If I refuse to work for someone, my job network member would put a penalty against my name. The same should be for those that refuse to work, when they can, to be penalised.

Quote:
And if they are getting paid more NOT to work (as you asserted), that is the fault of the system, not the blacks.


The whole point of indigenous Australian special privileges is to prevent indigenous people from living a barbaric culture. If I spent more than a month not looking for work or ways to improve my chances of obtaining a job, then I do not deserve the charity of the Australian taxpayer. In fact, given that the indigenous Australians lost Australia after the Settler Wars ended back in the 1920s, I see no reason to compensate the indigenous. But, the indigenous Australians are getting paid for their ancestors' loss with special benefits and land rights claims, regardless of only being Australians for the last 56 years.
Back to top
 

At this stage...
WWW  
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12485
Gender: male
Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #1762 - May 28th, 2023 at 12:34pm
 
I think Keating’s famous remark about the role of self-interest in human affairs is apposite.

Eg, supporting ’justice’ is one thing, but of course every individual has his own idea of justice; hence the need for rule of law.   

But as Doc Evatt discovered in 1946, the great powers did not want to submit to international law; they demanded (self-interestedly)  access to the veto power in the UNSC, against the wishes of  delegates from smaller countries championed by Evatt. 

Hence as many people have  been killed in wars since 1946 as were killed in WW2 itself, despite the preamble to the UN Charter: “….in order to save Mankind from the scourge of war….”.

The same thing is happening with the current Voice debate:  the basis for a ‘just’ sovereignty in Oz is disputed, on cultural/racial grounds (a point powerfully examined in the film ‘High Ground’).

My own view is the Voice should not be enshrined in the Constitution, but rather that a government Job Guarantee ought to be legislated; see prof. Bill Mitchell’s CofFEE (Centre of Full Employment and Equity).
Noel Pearson expressed his support for the JG in one of his Boyer lectures.

Blind self-interest**- rather than ensuring our survival as nature intended - will destroy the world in the age of MAD.
** including of the type informing neoliberal/neoclassical economics eg “the invisible hand”.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12485
Gender: male
Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #1763 - May 28th, 2023 at 1:13pm
 
UnSubRocky wrote on May 28th, 2023 at 10:56am:
thegreatdivide wrote on May 27th, 2023 at 1:42pm:
UnSubRocky wrote on May 27th, 2023 at 9:37am:
I felt like I just read an autoresponder message.


That's because the blind 'individual sovereignty'/  'freedom values' brain can't cope with macroeconomic realities; that's why you can't understand the fallacy of composition.   


No. It was because you did not make a direct response to what I wrote.


I did, by pointing out your response is ineligible, owing to your blind self-interested ideology,

Quote:
If you had the choice between working 38 hours a week earning $50,000 per year, or staying at home and getting $45,000 a year because of the extras you have as a result of your racial background, you might be happy to give up work life.


Indeed you might, so the solution to that problem is to redesign the system so that everyone is guaranteed participation, and  can work for $50K at a minimum for 38 hours work/week.

Quote:
The "yes" camp wants to continue the virtue signalling about giving indigenous Australians extra benefits, and feeling sorry for the current generation about their ancestors' mistreatment, etc.


The yes camp is also split re their motivation, but no doubt some ARE driven by such ineligible things.  As for "feeling sorry": the tragedy of the meeting of an ancient culture with a modern one in Oz 200 years ago, is powerfully  explored the film 'High Ground'.

After watching it last night, I'm voting Yes - simply because our own modern culture is hardly an advance on the ancient 'primitive, brutal' one; when it comes to consideration of LAW AND JUSTICE, we are still killing children in wars in the age of MAD.

So, if the voice results in a civil war in Oz, as graps says,  I say...you deserve it, just as you deserve all wars. 

Quote:
It is pass due that we do away with any racially discriminatory treatment and allow government authorities to focus on [b]preventing the creation of an impoverished society-- irrespective of racial background in Australia.


Agreed (!)...yet you are against the government- managed Job Guarantee.

Quote:
If they are not participating in paid work, that would deem them to be not trying to get work.


According to your absurd, ugly ideology: governemt can GUARANTEE everyone work, though that concept contravenes your self-interested Thatcherite 'small government' ideology which is instrumntal in maintaing the gap. 

Quote:
The whole point of indigenous Australian[b] special privileges is to prevent indigenous people from living a barbaric culture.


According to your greed-based world view which prohibits a government-implemented Job Guarantee; "special privileges" indicate a dysfunctional system in which you are complicit.   

Quote:
If I .....


"I, I, I..me,me, me": the blind ego thinking it can speak for all the world, whereas only law, and economic systems engendering collective well-being, can speak for all the world. 
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12485
Gender: male
Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #1764 - May 28th, 2023 at 1:24pm
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on May 27th, 2023 at 2:19pm:
Still no answer as to HOW you're going to change anything.... railing at the current economic system isn't doing it...


If I'm correct in my diagnosis, the truth will prevail in the end.....even if the nation has to go through a civil war - your proposition -  first.

Have you seen the film 'High Ground'?   see #1762/3.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Boris
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3977
Gender: male
Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #1765 - May 29th, 2023 at 9:03am
 
This will cause a Civil War
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
issuevoter
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 9200
The Great State of Mind
Gender: male
Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #1766 - May 29th, 2023 at 11:11am
 
Boris wrote on May 29th, 2023 at 9:03am:
This will cause a Civil War


Not if the footy is on.

Back to top
 

No political allegiance. No philosophy. No religion.
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12485
Gender: male
Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #1767 - May 29th, 2023 at 11:22am
 
issuevoter wrote on May 29th, 2023 at 11:11am:
Boris wrote on May 29th, 2023 at 9:03am:
This will cause a Civil War


Not if the footy is on.



Priceless:-)
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 83785
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #1768 - May 29th, 2023 at 11:30am
 
thegreatdivide wrote on May 28th, 2023 at 1:24pm:
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on May 27th, 2023 at 2:19pm:
Still no answer as to HOW you're going to change anything.... railing at the current economic system isn't doing it...


If I'm correct in my diagnosis, the truth will prevail in the end.....even if the nation has to go through a civil war - your proposition -  first.

Have you seen the film 'High Ground'?   see #1762/3.


Careful in your use of words - you'll give the children the wrong idea...

That's my interpretation, my prognostication, and my prophecy... it's not 'my proposition' ....
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12485
Gender: male
Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #1769 - May 29th, 2023 at 11:56am
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on May 29th, 2023 at 11:30am:
thegreatdivide wrote on May 28th, 2023 at 1:24pm:
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on May 27th, 2023 at 2:19pm:
Still no answer as to HOW you're going to change anything.... railing at the current economic system isn't doing it...


If I'm correct in my diagnosis, the truth will prevail in the end.....even if the nation has to go through a civil war - your proposition -  first.

Have you seen the film 'High Ground'?   see #1762/3.


Careful in your use of words - you'll give the children the wrong idea...


iirc, you were the first to introduce the idea of civil war, as a possible outcome of the voice referendum.

Quote:
That's my interpretation, my prognostication, and my prophecy... it's not 'my proposition' ....


Semantics?..the effect in your estimation is the same: civil war.

Meanwhile, low IQ Mundine is already getting hysterical, with his remarks about  'racist' high court judges; while everyone from the UN** down  is confused by the concept of 'sovereignty'. 

** the UN, with its 'rights' of indigenous peoples; how can h-g, pre-civilization cultures exist forever, regardless of "rights"?

 
Back to top
« Last Edit: May 29th, 2023 at 12:01pm by thegreatdivide »  
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 116 117 118 119 120 ... 298
Send Topic Print