Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Poll closed Poll
Question: Will the referendum be voted in?
*** This poll has now closed ***


No    
  42 (75.0%)
Yes    
  14 (25.0%)




Total votes: 56
« Last Modified by: Redmond Neck on: Feb 25th, 2023 at 11:17am »

Pages: 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 ... 298
Send Topic Print
The Aboriginal Voice referendum (Read 99991 times)
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12936
Gender: male
Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #210 - Nov 25th, 2022 at 3:45pm
 
Frank wrote on Nov 25th, 2022 at 3:13pm:
Ythegreatdivide wrote on Nov 25th, 2022 at 1:12pm:
Frank wrote on Nov 24th, 2022 at 7:43pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Nov 24th, 2022 at 5:16pm:
Frank wrote on Nov 22nd, 2022 at 2:52pm:
The lumpen, the lazy, drunk, dishonest, work shy? Keep them in the 'job'even if they do not turn up or do more damage than good when they do turn up? 


The vicious neoliberal TINA/NAIRU policy of permanent, entrenched unemployment to control wages and inflation, causes inestimable long term psychological damage and demoralization. You are merely describing the manifestation of that systemic viciousness.




You are avoiding the question and parroting sideways, as usual.  You address nothing, above or otherwise, but parrot crap regardless.


No; you are avoiding WHY "The lumpen, the lazy, drunk, dishonest, work shy" exist at all.

Answer, society's copout 'safety net' of demoralizing 'sit-down money' (the dole), the consequence of the vicious neoliberal TINA/NAIRU economy designed to maximize the claims of the most competitive on the nation's output.




They existed before capitalism, they exist in socialism - they have ALWAYS been with us.
You  try, idotically, to make them a recent,  neoliberal invention. That's  how ignorant and stupid you are, parrot.


Wrong again.

For a long time (ancient times until recently), economies could only function with slavery, to supply free labour.

Later, industrial-revolution Dickensonian  Britain featured the "poor houses", with the poverty rate c. 50%, albeit with an incredible increase in productive capacity as machines did much of the work formerly done manually. 

For a brief period 1946-1970s, Keynesian 'welfare state' economics achieved near universal well-being in the post-war capitalist nations, but wrong-headed supply-side Friedman/Thatcherite  'fight inflation first' (with permanent NAIRU unemployment) became mainstream after the 70s (after the stagflation of the mid 70s due to geopolitical causes). 

But today with post-industrial AI and IT assisted production in a global economy, your "the poor have always been with us" mantra is no longer a necessity.

Hence the need for a Job Guarantee, to counter the vicious NAIRU dogma with its devastating social consequences for the long-term unemployed. 






Back to top
« Last Edit: Nov 25th, 2022 at 3:52pm by thegreatdivide »  
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 46177
Gender: male
Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #211 - Nov 25th, 2022 at 9:17pm
 
thegreatdivide wrote on Nov 25th, 2022 at 3:45pm:
Frank wrote on Nov 25th, 2022 at 3:13pm:
Ythegreatdivide wrote on Nov 25th, 2022 at 1:12pm:
Frank wrote on Nov 24th, 2022 at 7:43pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Nov 24th, 2022 at 5:16pm:
Frank wrote on Nov 22nd, 2022 at 2:52pm:
The lumpen, the lazy, drunk, dishonest, work shy? Keep them in the 'job'even if they do not turn up or do more damage than good when they do turn up? 


The vicious neoliberal TINA/NAIRU policy of permanent, entrenched unemployment to control wages and inflation, causes inestimable long term psychological damage and demoralization. You are merely describing the manifestation of that systemic viciousness.




You are avoiding the question and parroting sideways, as usual.  You address nothing, above or otherwise, but parrot crap regardless.


No; you are avoiding WHY "The lumpen, the lazy, drunk, dishonest, work shy" exist at all.

Answer, society's copout 'safety net' of demoralizing 'sit-down money' (the dole), the consequence of the vicious neoliberal TINA/NAIRU economy designed to maximize the claims of the most competitive on the nation's output.




They existed before capitalism, they exist in socialism - they have ALWAYS been with us.
You  try, idotically, to make them a recent,  neoliberal invention. That's  how ignorant and stupid you are, parrot.


Wrong again.

For a long time (ancient times until recently), economies could only function with slavery, to supply free labour.

Later, industrial-revolution Dickensonian  Britain featured the "poor houses", with the poverty rate c. 50%, albeit with an incredible increase in productive capacity as machines did much of the work formerly done manually. 

For a brief period 1946-1970s, Keynesian 'welfare state' economics achieved near universal well-being in the post-war capitalist nations, but wrong-headed supply-side Friedman/Thatcherite  'fight inflation first' (with permanent NAIRU unemployment) became mainstream after the 70s (after the stagflation of the mid 70s due to geopolitical causes). 

But today with post-industrial AI and IT assisted production in a global economy, your "the poor have always been with us" mantra is no longer a necessity.

Hence the need for a Job Guarantee, to counter the vicious NAIRU dogma with its devastating social consequences for the long-term unemployed. 

You are an idiot. Vigorously ignorant and stupid in a Pavlovian dog kind of reflexivity.

Are these countries run along Friedman/ Thatcherite lines?


The 10 Poorest Countries in the World (based upon their 2020 GNI per capita in current US$):
Burundi - $270
Somalia - $310
Mozambique - $460
Madagascar - $480
Sierra Leone - $490
Afghanistan - $500
Central African Republic - $510
Liberia - $530
Niger - $540
Democratic Republic of the Congo (formerly Zaire) - $550


No. 70s oil shock? No. Geopolitical causes? No. They are culturally tribal, superstitious, stupid places in the grip of pre-modern mind-forged shackles. And you and the CCP want to replace their native shackles with Chinese ideological shackles.
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 84540
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #212 - Nov 25th, 2022 at 11:24pm
 
"They are culturally tribal, superstitious, stupid places in the grip of pre-modern mind-forged shackles."

I feel this comment has applications........
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12936
Gender: male
Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #213 - Nov 26th, 2022 at 12:50pm
 
Frank wrote on Nov 25th, 2022 at 9:17pm:
Are these countries run along Friedman/ Thatcherite lines?


The 10 Poorest Countries in the World (based upon their 2020 GNI per capita in current US$):
Burundi - $270
Somalia - $310
Mozambique - $460
Madagascar - $480
Sierra Leone - $490
Afghanistan - $500
Central African Republic - $510
Liberia - $530
Niger - $540
Democratic Republic of the Congo (formerly Zaire) - $550


Countries of the 'global south'?

They were all crippled by Western colonial exploitation, and sheer robbery of resources by Europe. Now of course maintained in their state of poverty by the US stooge the IMF - Instant Misery Fund.

Indeed regardless of whatever economic ideology happened to be mainstream at the time. 

Quote:
No. 70s oil shock? No. Geopolitical causes? No.


Irrelevant on both counts, as addressed above.

The 70s oil shock, and geopolitical competition,      gave birth to the abortion aka neoliberalism, in a misplaced effort to deal with the inflation caused by those two factors.   

Quote:
They are culturally tribal, superstitious, stupid places in the grip of pre-modern mind-forged shackles.
 

...and they were enslaved/colonized at the point of a  gun.  The colonialists didn't occupy those countries to share development with the natives.

Quote:
And you and the CCP want to replace their native shackles with Chinese ideological shackles.
.

No, I want to replace our current fake 'freedom", greed-based neoliberal economic system with one which engenders universal well-being.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Nov 26th, 2022 at 12:57pm by thegreatdivide »  
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 84540
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #214 - Nov 26th, 2022 at 1:23pm
 
"They were all crippled by Western colonial exploitation, and sheer robbery of resources by Europe."

I doubt they would have been better off left to their tribal state, and they certainly wouldn't truly understand that they were 'poor' without having been exposed to the West...  I've explained comparative poverty to you... doesn't sink in....
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12936
Gender: male
Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #215 - Nov 26th, 2022 at 1:39pm
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Nov 26th, 2022 at 1:23pm:
"They were all crippled by Western colonial exploitation, and sheer robbery of resources by Europe."

I doubt they would have been better off left to their tribal state, and they certainly wouldn't truly understand that they were 'poor' without having been exposed to the West...  I've explained comparative poverty to you... doesn't sink in....


It has "sunk in"; of course primitive cultures will be swept away by more advanced ones, that's the history of the world.

But the maintenance of poverty is a choice enforced by the powerful...also the history of the world. 

But 'times are a changin', given that sufficiency, not scarcity, is upon us for the first time in history (since the hunter gatherers, that is....) 
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
issuevoter
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 9200
The Great State of Mind
Gender: male
Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #216 - Nov 26th, 2022 at 1:43pm
 
Are we saying without European colonisation, Aboriginal life today would be better? They do seem to like the benifits of modern industrial society. Not all whinge about how hard-done-by they are. Park rangers especially.
Back to top
 

No political allegiance. No philosophy. No religion.
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12936
Gender: male
Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #217 - Nov 26th, 2022 at 1:54pm
 
issuevoter wrote on Nov 26th, 2022 at 1:43pm:
Are we saying without European colonisation, Aboriginal life today would be better?


No. You are being led astray by graps.

Quote:
They do seem to like the benifits of modern industrial society. Not all whinge about how hard-done-by they are. Park rangers especially.


The enforced idleness** among those who aren't park rangers - or otherwise employed - maintained by "sit down money", is the problem

** a systemic failing in our current NAIRU Thatcherite economic ideology.

http://pavlina-tcherneva.net/the-case-for-a-job-guarantee/

"One of the most enduring ideas in economics is that unemployment is both unavoidable and necessary for the smooth functioning of the economy***. This assumption has provided cover for the devastating social and economic costs of job insecurity. It is also false."

***"necessary", as posited by the evil NAIRU dogma of mainstream Thatcherite/neoliberal economics.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Nov 26th, 2022 at 2:00pm by thegreatdivide »  
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 84540
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #218 - Nov 26th, 2022 at 2:06pm
 
thegreatdivide wrote on Nov 26th, 2022 at 1:54pm:
issuevoter wrote on Nov 26th, 2022 at 1:43pm:
Are we saying without European colonisation, Aboriginal life today would be better?


No. You are being led astray by graps.

Quote:
They do seem to like the benifits of modern industrial society. Not all whinge about how hard-done-by they are. Park rangers especially.


The enforced idleness** among those who aren't park rangers - or otherwise employed - maintained by "sit down money", is the problem

** a systemic failing in our current NAIRU Thatcherite economic ideology.

http://pavlina-tcherneva.net/the-case-for-a-job-guarantee/

"One of the most enduring ideas in economics is that unemployment is both unavoidable and necessary for the smooth functioning of the economy***. This assumption has provided cover for the devastating social and economic costs of job insecurity. It is also false."

***"necessary", as posited by the evil NAIRU dogma of mainstream Thatcherite/neoliberal economics.


Nonsense - never said any such thing.. it is the ideologues who are trying to say they lived in Nirvana before Civilisation Day ... I've always said they have more opportunity than anyone else these days IF they want to take advantage of it. You, for one, are the one fixated on fixing everything with some ethereal job guarantee.... what if they don't show up?  No work and all pay?  You know - like paying the rent on our own country to the Abos by handing them the National Parks and then paying them to visit OUR national parks? 

Where did we ever develop any requirement to pay rent on our own country? 

Now let me try a simple example for you as regards comparative poverty....

If I buy that 50+ foot two master and set sail far from the madding crowd, gazing back at the passing shoreline and saying "there be demons a-plenty... and The Madness", retaining only the income of my current pension plus what I have in the bank, fishing as I go, travel where I want when I want etc, a lady in every port .......... am I richer or poorer than someone stuck in a single room flat in El Cidney/Bankistan or Melbadishu etc but earning twice my current pension?  Say a medical student in El Cidney with zero family to support them??? Someone striving and working for a better life with nothing??

Am I rich for being out there doing what I want - or am I poor?  When you consider this, consider the position of your Aborigine along the coast way up north in the warm tropics etc (sandy beaches, drinking rum every night, go fishing or hunting for a feed), living the life he chooses ...is he richer or poorer than some loser stuck in the nitty, gritty and struggling to make ends meet and eating noodles out of a packet?

Riddle me this........
Back to top
« Last Edit: Nov 26th, 2022 at 2:34pm by Grappler Truth Teller Feller »  

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12936
Gender: male
Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #219 - Nov 26th, 2022 at 2:39pm
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Nov 26th, 2022 at 2:06pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Nov 26th, 2022 at 1:54pm:
issuevoter wrote on Nov 26th, 2022 at 1:43pm:
Are we saying without European colonisation, Aboriginal life today would be better?


No. You are being led astray by graps.

Quote:
They do seem to like the benifits of modern industrial society. Not all whinge about how hard-done-by they are. Park rangers especially.


The enforced idleness** among those who aren't park rangers - or otherwise employed - maintained by "sit down money", is the problem

** a systemic failing in our current NAIRU Thatcherite economic ideology.

http://pavlina-tcherneva.net/the-case-for-a-job-guarantee/

"One of the most enduring ideas in economics is that unemployment is both unavoidable and necessary for the smooth functioning of the economy***. This assumption has provided cover for the devastating social and economic costs of job insecurity. It is also false."

***"necessary", as posited by the evil NAIRU dogma of mainstream Thatcherite/neoliberal economics.


Nonsense - never said any such thing..


you claim modern life is better the h-g life,  you and I agree, but you speak of "relative poverty" - a straw man, which leads simpletons like issue voter astray.
There was no poverty in h-g societies, everyone shared nature's  ' bounty' ....

Quote:
than it is the ideologues who are trying to say they lived in Nirvana before Civilisation Day ...


Well for the sake of the argument I will agree such ideologues exists - though 'Nirvana' is a bit over the top even for these 'culture ideologues' you refer to.   

Quote:
I've always said they have more opportunity than anyone else these days IF they want to take advantage of it.


And you are still refusing to acknowledge the disaster of the current mainstream NAIRU dogma..while apparently now arguing for a return to the h-g lifestyle..!!!!

Quote:
Now let me try a simple example for you as regards comparative poverty....


FFS... if you must ....just proving your inability to comprehend what I already said about 'relative poverty'.....a straw man comparing the h-g life with  modern life.

Quote:
If I buy that 50+ foot two master and set sail far from the madding crowd, gazing ack at the passing shoreline and saying "there be demons a-plenty... and The Madness", retaining only the income of my current pension plus what I have in the bank, fishing as I go, travel where I want when I want etc...... am I richer or poorer than someone stuck in a single room flat in El Cidney/Bankistan or Melbadishu etc but earning twice my current pension?


"Richer" for choosing what you want to do; (disregarding you had to pay -with money, the white man's invention) for that '50+ foot two master'...) and you need to be able to live without ANY ambition at all and withdraw completely from the modern world ...confined to catching enough fish to stay alive...if it's possible to live on fish alone...

Quote:
Am I rich for being out there doing what I want - or am I poor?


Up to you to answer that question , as discussed above.  
Quote:
When you consider this, consider the position of your Aborigine along the coast way up north in the warm tropics etc (sandy beaches, drinking rum every night, go fishing or hunting for a feed), living the life he chooses ...is he richer or poorer than some loser stuck in the nitty, gritty and struggling to make ends meet and eating noodles out of a packet?


Well .....drinking rum requires access to white  man's poison....but apart from that, if he can forget the vast horizons opened up by modern life he has seen - eg, mastering technology for improvement in health, physically exploring space, etc, he can no doubt exist in that state.   

Quote:
Riddle me this........


Easily solved....as shown above.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 84540
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #220 - Nov 26th, 2022 at 11:28pm
 
Well - them dogs just won't hunt.....

So you simply refuse to accept that the primitive hunter-gatherer lifestyle was poorer than the current lifestyle of everything provided?

You don't seem to want to understand - no straw man there - in any established society, some are rich... a Zulu with many cattle is a rich man....... a Vietnamese farmer with many rice paddies is a rich man.... he can provide an owned roof over his family's heads and food etc.... and his actual dollar income is small....

A Western man can go to work and earn fifty times as much and struggle to put an owned roof over his family's head and provide food...  AWE Vietnam $150 a month... AWE Australia around $1800 a month... most Australians don't get anywhere near that amount and costs of living are sky high.....

One is rich, the other poor...... as for the Abo, if he can live on the tropical beach in a house, fish at whim, get medicals provided and food trucked in, and still receive his stipend every fortnight to spend as he chooses while living the life he chooses without any stress unless he makes it so..... he is a rich man compared to some loser living in a cold water single room walk-up in Melbadishu in winter who is receiving the same cash value from government..

Lovely to be paid to pursue the lifestyle of your total and unhindered choice.... you need to be rich to even think that way....
Back to top
« Last Edit: Nov 26th, 2022 at 11:40pm by Grappler Truth Teller Feller »  

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12936
Gender: male
Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #221 - Nov 27th, 2022 at 12:19pm
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Nov 26th, 2022 at 11:28pm:
Well - them dogs just won't hunt.....

So you simply refuse to accept that the primitive hunter-gatherer lifestyle was poorer than the current lifestyle of everything provided?


Your confusion re the meaning of the word "poorer" is showing, even after you chastised me for refusing to acknowledge "relative poverty" ...as a result of YOUR confusion resulting from 'comparing apples, in this case the poverty-free, no-money h-g' economy, with oranges, the money-based modern economy with its entrenched poverty (based on lack of money for the least competitve). 

Quote:
You don't seem to want to understand - no straw man there - in any established society, some are rich... a Zulu with many cattle is a rich man....... a Vietnamese farmer with many rice paddies is a rich man.... he can provide an owned roof over his family's heads and food etc.... and his actual dollar income is small....


Addressed and exploded, above. The modern world economy is a money-based economy with entrenched poverty. The ancient h-g world with no money had no entrenched poverty, only periodic famine which is a different thing.

Quote:
A Western man can go to work and earn fifty times as much and struggle to put an owned roof over his family's head and provide food...  AWE Vietnam $150 a month... AWE Australia around $1800 a month... most Australians don't get anywhere near that amount and costs of living are sky high.....


See ..here you go, off on your usual GIGO gambit, THERE WAS NO MONEY... or "rich" people  (measured by money) in the h-g world, nor was there any "poverty" measured by lack of money. 

Quote:
One is rich, the other poor...... as for the Abo, if he can live on the tropical beach in a house, fish at whim, get medicals provided and food trucked in, and still receive his stipend every fortnight to spend as he chooses while living the life he chooses without any stress unless he makes it so..... he is a rich man compared to some loser living in a cold water single room walk-up in Melbadishu in winter who is receiving the same cash value from government..
 

More GIGO....blacks receiving 'stipends' is NOT the h-g world, it's your evil "sit-down money" world.

Quote:
Lovely to be paid to pursue the lifestyle of your total and unhindered choice.... you need to be rich to even think that way....


See your continuing confusion over the meaning of "rich" as measured by money, which has no relevance at all to the genuine long-gone h-g lifestyle. 

That confusion locks in your misunderstanding about money....and your complicity in maintaining the evil system of money creation by private financiers who use their sole privilege to create money, to charge governments austerity-entrenching interest on public-sector loans.

You ARE the barrier to closing the gap.   


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 84540
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #222 - Nov 27th, 2022 at 7:04pm
 
Comparative poverty sonny - does a guy who lives on a beach in a government provided house which costs no rent, has all his time to himself with no need to chase work, has fishing gear and boats etc provided for 'cultural reasons', and has medical and dental laid on including air transport when necessary and has all supplies including grog trucked in regularly....... suffer poverty in comparison with some guy living in a single room flat in a major city, who has no time to himself, has no gear provided, gets the same income but needs to chase work or lose it, and has to go out and find his supplies?

Simple question - is not an Abo living under those conditions and answerable to nobody, with now plentiful food etc, and money laid into the bank account every fortnight without any need to even look for work - poorer or richer than one who lived on that beach in 1787?  How does the modern Abo even know he's 'poor'?  On the basis of his verbal history, there is no way he could consider his current situation 'poor', and as for having the 'lectricity on etc - where did that figure in the verbal history?

What needs to be done is that Whartey go in there, tell them that the training will be provided to at least keep their 'settlement' up to scratch - they are to learn the ropes and put them to use - and once qualified Whartey will withdraw and they are ON THEIR OWN!

Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12936
Gender: male
Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #223 - Nov 28th, 2022 at 11:20am
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Nov 27th, 2022 at 7:04pm:
Comparative poverty sonny -  does a guy who lives on a beach in a government provided house which costs no rent, has all his time to himself with no need to chase work, has fishing gear and boats etc provided for 'cultural reasons', and has medical and dental laid on including air transport when necessary and has all supplies including grog trucked in regularly.......


And this straw man exists....where?

We are talking about the 3rd world conditions (poor health, poor housing, unemployed, alcohol- ravaged dysfunctional families) in camps outside the Alice, and the associated crime in the Alice; and dysfunctional alcohol- and poverty-ravaged  individuals seen in public buses and parks in Darwin, and the associated crime in Darwin and elsewhere ....all of which is manifested in the shocking statistics of the gap.   

Quote:
suffer poverty in comparison with some guy living in a single room flat in a major city, who has no time to himself, has no gear provided, gets the same income but needs to chase work or lose it, and has to go out and find his supplies?


Even this character is better off than those living in the 3rd world conditions in the ghetto camps mentioned above

Quote:
Simple question
-

None of this social dysfunction is simple, but let's see where your usual GIGO takes us.....

Quote:
is not an Abo living under those conditions and answerable to nobody, with now plentiful food etc, and money laid into the bank account every fortnight without any need to even look for work - poorer or richer than one who lived on that beach in 1787?


Well (for the sake of the argument) this mythical individual has a house, so presumably he is somewhat more comfortable (protected from the elements) than his 1787 brethren. But poorer or richer? Measured how? 

Quote:
How does the modern Abo even know he's 'poor'? 


Because he is living in poverty, in 3rd world ghetto camps outside the Alice, or unemployed and living in poverty in Darwin etc. while the white citizens in those localities are obviously NOT living in poverty, and a have access to good housing, utilities etc.    

Quote:
On the basis of his verbal history, there is no way he could consider his current situation 'poor', and as for having the 'lectricity on etc - where did that figure in the verbal history?


But the black people living in poverty today ARE aware of "not having 'lectricity".

Of course, those who want their old h-g culture back are wanting the impossible, aided and abetted by culture vultures in the white-black academic community - and now apparently aided by your absurd proposition for a  h-g gatherer lifestyle supported by the dole.   

Education is a legal requirement for all citizens in the modern world, after which few people will choose the h-g lifestyle supported by the dole, hence social dysfunction and crime even supported by the dole is the usual outcome. 

Quote:
What needs to be done is that Whartey go in there, tell them that the training will be provided to at least keep their 'settlement' up to scratch - they are to learn the ropes and put them to use - and once qualified Whartey will withdraw and they are ON THEIR OWN!


So you want to create  separate apartheid-like living conditions.....nice...and I thought you were railing against the division which you claim will result from constitutional recognition of the voice.

...the logical outcome of your usual GIGO analysis.

Back to top
« Last Edit: Nov 28th, 2022 at 11:28am by thegreatdivide »  
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 46177
Gender: male
Re: The Aboriginal Voice referendum
Reply #224 - Nov 28th, 2022 at 12:41pm
 
A relative of a Victorian Labor candidate who has described herself as a "proud Yorta Yorta woman" has said their family has no Indigenous ancestry and has never identified as Aboriginal.

Key points:
Labor candidate for Richmond Lauren O'Dwyer has described herself as "a proud Yorta Yorta woman"
A member of Ms O'Dwyer’s family says they have never identified as Aboriginal
Yorta Yorta community members say Ms O'Dwyer has failed to engage with the Yorta Yorta Nation Aboriginal Corporation and the Elders Council
Lauren O'Dwyer is running for election in the battleground seat of Richmond in Melbourne's inner north at this weekend's state election.

The ABC understands Ms O'Dwyer said her Indigenous heritage comes from her great-grandfather, Graham Berry.

However Mr Berry's daughter, Joan Keele, has told the ABC her father was not Aboriginal and never identified as Indigenous.

"My father was not … Aboriginal. His father was born in Swan Hill and his mother was born in Richmond," Ms Keele said.  "So he's nowhere near Yorta Yorta country.  We had a good relationship. We could chat about anything and everything, but [he] never, ever mentioned that."
ABC


Sooooo.... would O'Dwyer - associate director of first nations foundations -  be eligible to be elected to the voice?  Have a look and see the power of self-identifying.....

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-11-21/lauren-odwyer-labor-candidate-aboriginal-...

She must be Aboriginal on the Bruce Pascie side of her family, what?  Shocked Undecided
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 ... 298
Send Topic Print