Incorrect ..... any so called "crying" is about the fact that despite the result of the referendum ... the Labor states are pushing ahead with state based a "Voice" and Treaties ....

As there are 7 out of 8 States& Territories under Labor administration that would present as an introduction of a Voice by stealth.

Yet Sth Australia who were the 1st state to run an election for an Aboriginal Voice saw less than 10% of eligible Aboriginals turn out.

30,000 people were eligible to vote, but only 2,583 formal ballots were counted.

Seems that even Sth Australian Aboriginals, many of whom also had a vote in the national referendum & voted "no" as did the state on a whole at 60% NO .... don't want a State Voice to Parliament either.

Any hatred that has been engendered as a result of the Voice propaganda has been directed towards the Aboriginal activists and supporters of this divisive campaign.

A similar hatred is being engendered towards all these pro-Palestinian activists protesting and breeding unfettered anti-Semitism and Jew hating on our streets & University campuses.

People like you support politics of division and hatred.
Hypocrites writ large.

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on May 22^nd, 2024 at 1:20pm:


Careful, that's what the black activists are saying in Oz....

MeisterEckhart wrote on May 22^nd, 2024 at 11:04am:

If your thesis were true immigrant nations like Australia, NZ,  Canada, US wouldn't be so successful since they are filled with, built by,  a variety of 'displaced and dispossessed ' Europeans.

Dispossession and displacement are features of all expanding dominant cultures - with all of them justifying their actions by claiming cultural and moral superiority.

Winston Churchill infamously said of the plight of Australian Aboriginals that he did not apologise for the dispossession and displacement of the native Australian populations nor did he respect any claims for compensation as they were conquered by culturally and morally superior people.

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on May 23^rd, 2024 at 10:31am:

As for cultural expansionism, so too for tribal/clan expansionism.

Every square inch of accessible and useable land, wherever humans have inhabited, has been fought over, ending either in stalemate or dispossession and displacement of the vanquished.

Frank wrote on May 23^rd, 2024 at 7:57am:

Notwithstanding the dramatic ethnic tensions within the early Anglosphere between the likes of the English and Irish, and those among religious/class subcultures of the British Isles, immigrants very quickly adopted new ethnocultures - the notion of being American, Australian, Canadian and NZer - which they strived to become.

These new ethnocultures almost universally excluded the geo-native populations from participation, or included them at the cost of abandoning their geo-native cultures including languages, for a new (Anglo-Euro-centric) identity, and become effectively underclasses within the new ethnocultures

Foreign cultures establishing themselves in new lands all have one thing in common - their foreignness and, by this, they have common cause to forge a new singular identity (religious and other cultural incompatibilities notwithstanding).

Native cultures are inextricably linked to the territory and history of their geographic location, which is why it is generally unacceptable for, say, a German to demand German customs prevail against the will of the French in France.

But dominant cultures are not dominant by fiat. They are dominant in that they can enforce their rule over competing cultures, native or otherwise - as Putin recently put it, they therefore have a right to sovereignty over the territory and a right to have that sovereignty respected.

Under those conditions, whether alternative or competing cultures have any right to coexist, make territorial claims, or be respected is only determinable by the dominant culture.

It is only in the very recent past that native languages were permitted by the dominant cultures to be spoken within the Anglosphere.