MeisterEckhart wrote on May 23
rd, 2024 at 10:56am:
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on May 23
rd, 2024 at 10:44am:
Complex issue, as I said. What you cannot do is have two different sets of sovereignty over land etc claims competing with one another over every square inch... nor can you hand a disproportionate area of land etc over to a minority and create of them New Lords Of All They Survey and with the right to impose on all others.
No state is necessarily permanent.
Will Australia exist as a single contiguous entity from coast to coast in, say, 200 years?Why is multi-sovereignty not possible? That is exactly what was once proposed for the city of Jerusalem.
We're trying to cut the Gaga Strip and Victoria loose, float them out to sea.... WA is just a mining hole anyway ... the Terr'Uh'Tree is a crime hole where 76 out of 81 women killed - 49 times higher per capita of their demographic than all others there - is not worth having.
Multi-sovereignty totally controlled by small and diffuse racial (and racist) groups with no idea is never going to be a good idea. You must not confuse the two concepts. What if we were to have small and scattered groups of semi-educated, semi-literate, and inexperienced Pure Nordic Whites doing that?
I doubt more than 2% of the population would even consider such a thing. What about we make it small groups of yellow men? Let's make it Greeks or Italians or Arabs or something.... choose any group that you consider should totally own and control the country over all others.
The very problem with any 'voice' for Aborigines is that they are small groups - here and up the road they don't even talk to one another, and our lot despise them inlanders. Ancient enemies, you see... they used to kill one another.... what a great recipe for governing a series of small nations... be worse than 'liberated' South Africa.