Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Feb 19^th, 2023 at 2:24pm:


Interfering? I think you'll find Voltaire would not accuse me of that....

Quote:


I worked because I had to, like most of us (unlike Mozart who had a direct line to the infinite all his life...and yet his widow couldn't afford to pay for his funeral....understand?) 

Quote:


Participating - and being paid - for useful work is NOT "free funding".

And you need more than one generation to change a culture.

Quote:


No: whartey is confusing real resources with money, and hence cancelling successful participatory schemes like the CDEP, because "it cost too much"... showing a complete lack of understanding of how money is created....


Quote:


No evasion: "it's the economy, stupid".

You don't believe it? That's a problem you must deal with.

And begin by learning the difference between real resources, and money: real resources (inc. labour) are finite, but not limited by money, which means the issue is resource allocation), NOT money which is created out of thin air.

But by all means carry on with your 'anti voice' crusade, if you think 'NO" will achieve something positive.

Nothing then?  Not at the cost of Parliamentary elected democracy.... thanks for coming Adolph.

It's been explained over and over - they need to come to the party on closing gaps etc...

I think they ought to have the power to decide which ungrateful/insulting/asshole on internet forums ought to be exposed for who they really are rather than  have the priviledge of hiding behind fake  names that protect them from  the horrible things they would never have the guts to say the face of a single black man in person- they should have the right to cancel assholes and ruin them forever!

A voice should have some power behind it !

Here are Marcia Langton's own words:-

“If a decision is made without listening to the Voice it could be challenged in the High Court and potentially stopped from being implemented until the Voice has been heard.  That's a possibility and why wouldn't we want that to be the case.  If nothing that the Voice says is subject to the ordinary laws – in other words it's completely gutted and has no safe standing, if you like, then the government can ignore all of the Voice's decisions with impunity.  And I think that's what Craven's aiming for, he's aiming for... you know.. a toothless tiger.”



Plenty of real meat there for discussion, children..... let's hear it by start of class tomorrow morning.

Marcia Langton warns of risk of ‘nasty, eugenicist’ debate about race ahead of voice referendum

“We have to take these matters seriously. This is too important to play nasty electoral politics about … it would be terribly unfortunate for all Australians if the debate sinks into a nasty, eugenicist, 19th century-style of debate about the superior race versus the inferior race.”