AusGeoff wrote on Dec 12
th, 2022 at 3:10pm:
Higgins should've been charged with contempt of court after
speaking to the media on 27 October. The claim that the trial
had been aborted two days earlier was incorrect. The case is
relisted for 20 February 2023. Higgins was referred to the court
and to police after after criticising the criminal justice system
on live television.
THIS "speech" of Higgins was totally out of order considering
the case is not concluded, and of course there's no verdict.
This should have been a case of contempt...
Quote:"Like all women who experience sexual violence, I knew the odds
were stacked against me. The criminal justice system has long failed
to deliver outcomes to victims of sexual assault".
First your claims have to be proven or there is no victim. As for the stacked odds - it is nothing of the sort - a complainant has the obligation to prove their case beyond ANY reasonable doubt - and the criminal justice system did its job perfectly in her case..... it isn't about 'delivering outcomes to victims of sexual assault' - it is about proving there was a victim in the first place.
In making that statement, clearly she is demanding that the outcome be a foregone conclusion..... guilt by denunciation, the feminist and Neo-Stalinist dream... but only if the accused is a man and therefore representative of their suffering under the 'patriarchy'.... but they don't hate all men - not at all..... just this 'patriarchy'....
As I said - clearly she was coached and maybe even had that ghost written to achieve the maximum effect for The Latest Cause For Women as Perpetual Victims Of Everything.... most likely by that butch haircut lawyer or that commissioner for victims declared in advance of any finding......