Poll added.

Please note that your answer is to be based on the evidence you've seen presented.

It should have nothing to do with whether or not you yourself would like to see a conviction or not.

Flip

And for those complaining that this is a trial of Brittany Higgins... the evidence must be tested... get a life.

Whichever way this turns out, nobody will win, though I would not be unhappy to see the sneaky politicians cop a serve or ten... I believe there is more to this, as I laid out... if that's the quality of Army Reserve Generals, call me when the fighting is over.  SOTH again.

Unfortunately, like Aussie with his rush to judgement negative on grounds of assumption and clear prejudice, I cannot prove any of that, so I'll just say they lack credibility.

https://www.polanimal.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=93&t=19565

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 22^nd, 2022 at 10:50am:


Are you really a brain dead moron?  See below.

Quote:


Why are you ignoring, for example, the extremely hard and consistent EVIDENCE of Brittany Higins?

Quote:


Yes, I suspect you are a brain dead moron.

Many decisions need to be made based all sorts of evidence including the evidence given by a complainant.  One must assess the credibility of the complainant.  Included in that assessment must be any denial made by the accused person.  Lehrmann makes a denial.  So, that is a direct challenge to Jurors to make an assessment of the credibility of the two.  One the one hand, we have her SWORN testimony and her cross-examination in Court in front of Judge and Jury.  On the other hand, we have his unsworn pub talk denial made to associates and Coppers, totally untested by cross-examination.  She wins in my conclusion.

Quote:


See, cowardice.  Imagine you are on the Jury.  Would you not regard those different versions about a VITAL aspect of the case, as very damning of his position?

Quote:


And there is your grave error and why Mothra is correct when she often attacks you as a misogynist.  There is VERY HARD EVIDENCE, including that of the SWORN TESTIMONY OF BRITTANY HIGGINS.  Why do you keep pretending it does not exist?

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 22^nd, 2022 at 7:58pm:


Chalk and cheese.  Dead men tell no tales and cannot give evidence like rape victims.

Aussie wrote on Oct 22^nd, 2022 at 12:01pm:



What the fqq is wrong with you?


I swear you are a moron - there, it's incontrovertible.


And I am a lady.

Touch that.

Johnnie wrote on Oct 22^nd, 2022 at 8:29pm:



I thought the 'lying cow' was about the way they handled their interview with her.  she says she felt intimidated and under some compulsion to do what they appeared to want - they say that was not the case and they were being supportive, etc.

I don't think that had anything much to do with the actual event.

I am frankly bewildered by the lack of underwear... never heard of such a thing unless it was ready for instant action.  But with that guy?  Not being a woman I am maybe off beam here, but he doesn't look to me like a great scalp to collect.

It's all a very strange case.

If Belgarion and I had been in charge of security it would never have arisen.... and as I said - my office door is always open and all such discussions are fully recorded in a glass room... nothing sneaky in any way and no misunderstandings.

I feel Reynolds let down the side in the way she handled this thing.  A genuine boss would have taken further steps ...... not just offered counseling and maybe a little job transfer, which didn't make Brittany feel very secure.  It appears she felt she was on borrowed time and was being set up anyway, and all the 'support' was meant to make her final demise look good and her own fault.

Looks like it worked...