Frank wrote on Oct 22
nd, 2022 at 8:42pm:
Aussie wrote on Oct 22
nd, 2022 at 12:01pm:
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 22
nd, 2022 at 10:50am:
If this was the lay down misere you reckon it is, the Jury would not still be deliberating after two days.
If this was the lay down misere you reckon it is, the Jury would not still be deliberating after two days. I haven't reckoned anything apart from ' there is no hard evidence'. You are getting emotional again, old boy. Steady... steady.... you'll blow a gasket.
And there is your grave error
and why Mothra is correct when she often attacks you as a misogynist. There
is VERY HARD EVIDENCE, including that of the
SWORN TESTIMONY OF BRITTANY HIGGINS. Why do you keep pretending it does not exist?
What the fqq is wrong with you?
I swear you are a moron - there, it's incontrovertible.
And I am a lady.
Touch that.
It is a single piece of evidence, verbal at best, without a single substantial corroborative piece of evidence. That is insufficient to convict anyone.
You DO understand 'substantial corroborative evidence', don't you? Clearly, Aussie, you are an avid supporter, indeed a fan, of the standard police approach of simply making assertions on oath without any supporting evidence, and that being sufficient for a court....
If so - you are as bad as every corrupt cop in this nation ..... and surely - as a lawyer - you've seen that in action time and time again....
So why the different approach now? Sucking up to City Hall? Institutionalised into the belief that this is the way Law works properly and should always work? That someone can just come along and make an assertion without a single shred of proof and that is sufficient for a hanging?
Where you bin in all those Royal Commissions, consigliere?
WTF is wrong with you? Are you one of those Joans of Arc who want conviction for men purely on the unsupported assertion of a woman?
I ask again - WTF is wrong with you?