Baronvonrort wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2024 at 11:50pm:


UN Resolution 181 neither partitioned Palestine nor conferred any legal authority to the Zionists for their unilateral declaration of Israel's existence.

There is a widely accepted belief that United Nations General Assembly Resolution 181 “created” Israel, based upon an understanding that this resolution partitioned Palestine or otherwise conferred legal authority or legitimacy to the declaration of the existence of the state of Israel. However, despite its popularity, this belief has no basis in fact, as a review of the resolution’s history and examination of legal principles demonstrates incontrovertibly.

read more:

https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2010/10/26/the-myth-of-the-u-n-creation-of-...

Laugh till you cry wrote on Jul 24^th, 2024 at 7:06pm:



The thing about you, throbbo, is that there is NO conversation to be had with you.
You are the grusome Islamic Pallos writ small - no dialogue, no listening, no compromise, no nuffin.

Don’t be fooled. The ruling by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on 19 July that Israel’s occupation of Palestine is unlawful is earth-shattering. Israel is a rogue state, according to the world’s highest court.

For that reason, the judgment will be studiously ignored by the cabal of western states and their medias that for decades have so successfully run cover for Israel...

Western politicians and columnists will keep emphasising that the World Court is offering nothing more than an “advisory opinion” and one that is “non-binding”.

What they won’t point out is that this opinion is the collective view of the world’s most eminent judges on international law, the people best positioned to rule on the occupation’s legality.

And it is non-binding only because the western powers who control our international bodies plan to do nothing to implement a decision that doesn’t suit them.

Nonetheless, the ruling will have dramatic consequences for Israel, and its western patrons, even if those consequences will take months, years or even decades to play out...


Apartheid rule

The World Court’s ruling is most significant in that it permanently blows apart western states’ cover story about Israel.

The judges point out that Israel’s permanent occupation of the territories, and its transfer of Jewish settlers into them, has necessitated the development of two separate and distinct systems of laws.

One is for the Jewish settlers, enshrining for them the rights enjoyed by Israelis. Palestinians, by contrast, must submit to the whims of an alien and belligerent military regime.

There is a word for such an arrangement: apartheid.

Over the past decade, a consensus had already emerged in the world’s human rights community - from Amnesty International to Human Rights Watch - that Israel was an apartheid state.

Now the world’s highest judicial body has declared that it agrees.

Apartheid is a crime against humanity. This means that Israeli officials are war criminals, quite aside from the crimes they are currently committing in Gaza.

That was why the Israeli media reported panic inside the Israeli government at the ICJ ruling.

Officials fear that it will leave the International Criminal Court, its sister court, with no option but to issue arrest warrants against Netanyahu and his defence minister, Yoav Gallant, as already requested by its chief prosecutor.

It is also likely to strengthen the ICC’s resolve to prosecute more senior Israeli officials for crimes associated with Israel’s settlement programme.

A former Israeli foreign ministry official told the Haaretz newspaper that the World Court ruling had punctured Israel’s claim to be a western-style state: “The democratic aura is no longer protecting us as it did before."


https://www.middleeasteye.net/opinion/icj-clears-fog-hiding-western-support-isra...

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Aug 20^th, 2024 at 11:51pm:


Wrong as usual: Israel ceased to exist under the emperor  Hadrian, and all Jews were expelled from the land.

In 1947, the West-dominated UN voted to partition  Palestine, resulting in the birth of "Islamic terrorism". 


Quote:


Oz blacks have only got back 50% of the land; you want Israelis to get 100% of their former lands. 

tallowood wrote on Aug 21^st, 2024 at 1:21pm:



The 4th century figures are misleading; the Christian Byzantines banished Jews from Jerusalem, even if a majority in 'Palestina'  were in fact Jews. 

In fact the conquering Caliph in the 7th century allowed Jews to return to Jerusalem.

But the point is: "Judea" - eradicated by Hadrian - ceased to belong to Jews, until the UN partitioned Palestine, allowing Jews to reclaim half of Palestine.

As for the illegal Jewish occupation: both Hamas and Netanyahu are war criminals sought by the ICC for war crimes, as noted by Senator Bernie Sanders (a Jew)  recently.        

tallowood wrote on Aug 21^st, 2024 at 2:23pm:


And what has any of that to do with the fact Jews were a minority in Palestine during the British Mandate era, leading up to the UN Partition? 

And Israel's current illegal occupation of  the WB.

wombatwoody wrote on Aug 22^nd, 2024 at 10:36pm:


... and Blaxie, Wentie and Lawsie went across the mountains (some now say with a native guide or something - Jesus - just take the easy way and follow the tracks - and how did they see them sweeping plains etc from Mt Victoria - or even get down... it was all trees - I suspect a lot of ball's chat is in our early histories here), and came upon the Bathurstites who were seven nations stronger - and then came the hosts of Britain to make treaties with them and then even show them mercy when they rose up and were defeated.

Is no mercy - is no Aborigine.... Bathurst Rules.... Sydney Basin Rules.. Everywhere Else Rules... Is No Mercy - Is No Aborigines Left... instead they are expanding in number... rooting the white out of Australia, alongside Albo and his New Abos coming in droves...  WTF is wrong with that man? Does he hate the place so much he needs to flood it with Third Worlders and terrorists?  It's not our fault the kids at school called him WOG and stole his lunch money.... he wanted to be Albo, not his sainted Irish mother's name...

"Hi - meet me dad - otherwise known as The Invisible Man...."

Jeez - them Jebusites sound dangerous.... but they weren't Beyond the Pale Stinians (HAMAS) then... not even Arabs... just a few goat herders ...

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Aug 23^rd, 2024 at 5:37am:


... and Blaxie, Wentie and Lawsie went across the mountains... [quote]

The Jews themselves were eventually dispossessed from "The Promised Land" - which they had conquered from orhers - by a succession of world empires; you are now arguing the Jews have a right to repossess it, even though they were in a minority during the Palestine Mandate era.

Whereas it seems Oz blacks were indeed the first human inhabitants of Oz, until the 'modern' world entered Oz in 1788...