MeisterEckhart wrote on Dec 6
th, 2022 at 12:33pm:
Frank wrote on Dec 6
th, 2022 at 12:19pm:
But the a BRAVE media would have questioned the excessive government measures in both kinds of jurisdictions, not change its principles depending on what kind of government is enforcing excessive Covid rules. But Western media and commentariat feared for their own career and so they fell in with the government lines.
In the context of a panic situation, governments did what they thought was right - their politicians also having been driven by panic - even if that was to blindly follow the moves of the first to react - a totalitarian regime.
Panic is the enemy of reason; the antithesis of reason, so yes it's inevitable that institutions yield to its force in the absence of any other plan.
However, the democracies didn't take the opportunity to indulge in an orgy of inhuman brutality, as the CCP did, and continued to do until the Chinese people found out the CCP was lying to them about the need for brutal measures.
You nailed it.
It wasn't science they were following. They lied about that.
They panicked and went loco on the community.
Have the Chinese opened fire on their citizens yet?
I'd call that inhuman brutality.
Can't wait to hear our traitorous media's response to that when they do, cause they're going too.
Australian police were seen in a massive gang, crossing the road to bash innocent citizens walking down the footpath. The court case is current right now.
I'd call that inhuman brutality.
Australian police were seen slamming innocent peoples heads into the pavement for no reason what so ever, even jamming the butt of an AR style assault rifle into the stomach of one lady.
I'd call that inhuman brutality.
What about Australian police holding a single loan woman on the ground and ripping her dress up and exposing her to the public. I'd call that inhuman brutality.
Then at the end of all this, the police have withdrawn all the fines. So these people suffered for nothing.
As for the vid.
Frank summed it up clearly.