Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 
Send Topic Print
China: little pinks see merit in 50 million dead (Read 2412 times)
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12978
Gender: male
Re: China: little pinks see merit in 50 million dead
Reply #45 - Jun 25th, 2024 at 6:24pm
 
freediver wrote on Jun 25th, 2024 at 3:10pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Jun 24th, 2024 at 6:02pm:
freediver wrote on Jun 23rd, 2024 at 5:51pm:
Quote:
Zero -  the extent of your insight into your delusional "freedom values" ideology.


So if the CCP give the Chinese people zero income, then increased that income a million fold, more than any other government on earth, how wealthy would the Chinese people be?

Low IQ?

Zero wealth ...don't tell the 400 million Chinese in the middle class galavanting around the world,  or the 800 billionaires. 

Quote:
LOL. They are   were about 100 years behind the rest of the developed world.


Corrected it for you.

Quote:
They were starving their own citizens to death well after the rest of the world understood why it was happening. They were only able to play catchup because they learned so slowly for a whole century.


So...lifting more than a billion people out of absolute poverty at the fastest rate in history (while India is STILL stuck with 700 milion in absolute povety), wasn't fast enough for you......


Of course not.


Then you are a blind ideologue bent on projecting the failures of delusional "fundamental freedoms' ideology and its egregious effects on the Oz population - as outlined in the Oxfam report (which you continue to ignore, being blind).      

Quote:
Would you prefer your government stop starving its citizens to death before or after you die of starvation?
 

Before, why do you ask such a dumb question?

The relevant  question today (not confusing yourself with events which occured 70 years ago) is why do think the current cost of living crisis and homelessness crisis  in Oz is acceptable?

Quote:
BTW, taking a century to figure out how to not slaughter people by the millions is not fast. It is slow.


Wrong again, it took only 2 decades, from the start of the famine to Deng's reforms which thereafter eradicated poverty faster than any nation in history.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12978
Gender: male
Re: China: little pinks see merit in 50 million dead
Reply #46 - Jun 25th, 2024 at 6:39pm
 
freediver wrote on Jun 25th, 2024 at 4:20pm:
Quote:
My own theory is that China let the virus spread through China to kill off the elderly.


It was sheer incompetence. Like with the great Chinese famine. The only difference is that this time around they did a better job covering up the death toll.


Well, at least you disposed of Sub's silly theory; but as to "incompetence" in dealing with a vast population in a developing country faced with a potentially catastrophic pandemic, you are not equipped to judge "competence".

OTOH, this from a Western commentator today (on China’s Chang’e-6 safe return to Earth with first-ever lunar far side samples, completed today):

“I do think a successful conclusion to this very complex mission [Chang’e-6] will show that Chang’e-5 was not just a fluke, and that Chinese space engineers really have mastered the challenges of carrying out these very difficult missions far from Earth, it's a real step forward in the maturity of the Chinese space effort,” Jonathan McDowell, an astronomer from the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in the US, told the Global Times on Tuesday.

There's competence for you.



   
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12978
Gender: male
Re: China: little pinks see merit in 50 million dead
Reply #47 - Jun 25th, 2024 at 7:12pm
 
UnSubRocky wrote on Jun 25th, 2024 at 4:59pm:
Pffft! China stopped counting their infections after a while.


Low IQ?

The strictest lockdowns in the world were ancillary to counting deaths in the world's most populous nation (along with India).

Cf the million dead in the US with its sloppy lockdowns in disputatious states. 

Quote:
Are you just going to believe the Chinese managed to stop the infections and deaths from covid all of a sudden, too?
 

No, what gve you that idea? 

Quote:
Are you not concerned at ALL about China?


No. In 5000 years China has waxed and waned according to sovereignty disputes on adjoining lands, it has never colonized overseas countries (except Taiwan which is 100 kms from the mainland). 

Quote:
I figure that China will break up into some smaller countries within 10 years.


In your dreams?

The UN - with its 'One China' policy - doesn't include China in its list of colonizing or occupying powers.   

Quote:
Welllll, I have developed a moderate anti-American stance in recent years. Okay, it is more about heckling the Americans because of their self-inflicted doofisms.


You should be calling out their insistence on global hegemony, involving them in countless proxy  wars since WW2, including the present Ukraine war. (See what Nigel Farage has to say about it).

Quote:
But, I would rather the Americans to remain a superpower and continue an amicable relationship with Australia. It is better than the USA sliding into third-world status, and we (Australians) have to get dictated to by the Chinese.


Yep, you have fallen for the "China threat" theory.

Quote:
I am motivated by being politically aware of what goes on in the world. For the last 31 years of my life, I have kept note of how the world treats Western and American influence. Given that you are such a left-wing lunatic, you would be aware of how much hatred the West (and the USA) gets from non-Western societies.


You bet; so why do 4 to 5 billion people despise the US- led West?

Quote:
I disagree with the "One China" policy. China can simply work with Taiwan and Hong Kong as separate entities and not engage in hostilities.


So you are insisting the Chinese people in HK and Taiwan be divided by ideology, with the loony "freedom values" mob free to claim sovereignty and separate from the motherland.

No nation would accept it.   

Quote:
Otherwise, if there is an escalation in tensions in the region, either you are going to sign up for the military....


Just to let you know, if that situation ever arises as a result of US global hegemonic desires, I'l be coming for you, not China.    

Quote:
you don't seem like the type that would fight for your country (at least, not Australia), I won't hold your views as worthy.


Bingo, you delusional "freedom or death" war-mongering  ideologue.

Obviously the Anzacs died in vain...while you are intent on breeding the next crop of cannon fodder.


Back to top
« Last Edit: Jun 26th, 2024 at 12:38pm by thegreatdivide »  
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49091
At my desk.
Re: China: little pinks see merit in 50 million dead
Reply #48 - Jun 25th, 2024 at 7:18pm
 
thegreatdivide wrote on Jun 25th, 2024 at 6:24pm:
freediver wrote on Jun 25th, 2024 at 3:10pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Jun 24th, 2024 at 6:02pm:
freediver wrote on Jun 23rd, 2024 at 5:51pm:
Quote:
Zero -  the extent of your insight into your delusional "freedom values" ideology.


So if the CCP give the Chinese people zero income, then increased that income a million fold, more than any other government on earth, how wealthy would the Chinese people be?

Low IQ?

Zero wealth ...don't tell the 400 million Chinese in the middle class galavanting around the world,  or the 800 billionaires. 

Quote:
LOL. They are   were about 100 years behind the rest of the developed world.


Corrected it for you.

Quote:
They were starving their own citizens to death well after the rest of the world understood why it was happening. They were only able to play catchup because they learned so slowly for a whole century.


So...lifting more than a billion people out of absolute poverty at the fastest rate in history (while India is STILL stuck with 700 milion in absolute povety), wasn't fast enough for you......


Of course not.


Then you are a blind ideologue bent on projecting the failures of delusional "fundamental freedoms' ideology and its egregious effects on the Oz population - as outlined in the Oxfam report (which you continue to ignore, being blind).      

Quote:
Would you prefer your government stop starving its citizens to death before or after you die of starvation?
 

Before, why do you ask such a dumb question?

The relevant  question today (not confusing yourself with events which occured 70 years ago) is why do think the current cost of living crisis and homelessness crisis  in Oz is acceptable?

Quote:
BTW, taking a century to figure out how to not slaughter people by the millions is not fast. It is slow.


Wrong again, it took only 2 decades, from the start of the famine to Deng's reforms which thereafter eradicated poverty faster than any nation in history.


Because you post such incredibly stupid propaganda for the CCP. Taking a century and killing 100 million of your own citizens along the way is not fast learning.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12978
Gender: male
Re: China: little pinks see merit in 50 million dead
Reply #49 - Jun 25th, 2024 at 7:26pm
 
freediver wrote on Jun 25th, 2024 at 7:18pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Jun 25th, 2024 at 6:24pm:
freediver wrote on Jun 25th, 2024 at 3:10pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Jun 24th, 2024 at 6:02pm:
freediver wrote on Jun 23rd, 2024 at 5:51pm:
Quote:
Zero -  the extent of your insight into your delusional "freedom values" ideology.


So if the CCP give the Chinese people zero income, then increased that income a million fold, more than any other government on earth, how wealthy would the Chinese people be?

Low IQ?

Zero wealth ...don't tell the 400 million Chinese in the middle class galavanting around the world,  or the 800 billionaires. 

Quote:
LOL. They are   were about 100 years behind the rest of the developed world.


Corrected it for you.

Quote:
They were starving their own citizens to death well after the rest of the world understood why it was happening. They were only able to play catchup because they learned so slowly for a whole century.


So...lifting more than a billion people out of absolute poverty at the fastest rate in history (while India is STILL stuck with 700 milion in absolute povety), wasn't fast enough for you......


Of course not.


Then you are a blind ideologue bent on projecting the failures of delusional "fundamental freedoms' ideology and its egregious effects on the Oz population - as outlined in the Oxfam report (which you continue to ignore, being blind).      

Quote:
Would you prefer your government stop starving its citizens to death before or after you die of starvation?
 

Before, why do you ask such a dumb question?

The relevant  question today (not confusing yourself with events which occured 70 years ago) is why do think the current cost of living crisis and homelessness crisis  in Oz is acceptable?

Quote:
BTW, taking a century to figure out how to not slaughter people by the millions is not fast. It is slow.


Wrong again, it took only 2 decades, from the start of the famine to Deng's reforms which thereafter eradicated poverty faster than any nation in history.


Because you post such incredibly stupid propaganda for the CCP. Taking a century and killing 100 million of your own citizens along the way is not fast learning.


Stupid propaganda?

I'm happy to let the above exchange stand as is; it reveals the shocking incapacity of your blind "freedom values" brain.

It' time to get back to your 'foundations' thread' (which you abandoned), to see if you can save your delusional "freedom values" ideology.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49091
At my desk.
Re: China: little pinks see merit in 50 million dead
Reply #50 - Jun 25th, 2024 at 8:54pm
 
thegreatdivide wrote on Jun 25th, 2024 at 7:26pm:
freediver wrote on Jun 25th, 2024 at 7:18pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Jun 25th, 2024 at 6:24pm:
freediver wrote on Jun 25th, 2024 at 3:10pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Jun 24th, 2024 at 6:02pm:
freediver wrote on Jun 23rd, 2024 at 5:51pm:
Quote:
Zero -  the extent of your insight into your delusional "freedom values" ideology.


So if the CCP give the Chinese people zero income, then increased that income a million fold, more than any other government on earth, how wealthy would the Chinese people be?

Low IQ?

Zero wealth ...don't tell the 400 million Chinese in the middle class galavanting around the world,  or the 800 billionaires. 

Quote:
LOL. They are   were about 100 years behind the rest of the developed world.


Corrected it for you.

Quote:
They were starving their own citizens to death well after the rest of the world understood why it was happening. They were only able to play catchup because they learned so slowly for a whole century.


So...lifting more than a billion people out of absolute poverty at the fastest rate in history (while India is STILL stuck with 700 milion in absolute povety), wasn't fast enough for you......


Of course not.


Then you are a blind ideologue bent on projecting the failures of delusional "fundamental freedoms' ideology and its egregious effects on the Oz population - as outlined in the Oxfam report (which you continue to ignore, being blind).      

Quote:
Would you prefer your government stop starving its citizens to death before or after you die of starvation?
 

Before, why do you ask such a dumb question?

The relevant  question today (not confusing yourself with events which occured 70 years ago) is why do think the current cost of living crisis and homelessness crisis  in Oz is acceptable?

Quote:
BTW, taking a century to figure out how to not slaughter people by the millions is not fast. It is slow.


Wrong again, it took only 2 decades, from the start of the famine to Deng's reforms which thereafter eradicated poverty faster than any nation in history.


Because you post such incredibly stupid propaganda for the CCP. Taking a century and killing 100 million of your own citizens along the way is not fast learning.


Stupid propaganda?

I'm happy to let the above exchange stand as is; it reveals the shocking incapacity of your blind "freedom values" brain.

It' time to get back to your 'foundations' thread' (which you abandoned), to see if you can save your delusional "freedom values" ideology.


It was money from all those "freedom values" countries that poured into China to lift living standards. All the CCP learned after 100 years and 100 million deaths was to get out of the way and let it happen.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12978
Gender: male
Re: China: little pinks see merit in 50 million dead
Reply #51 - Jun 25th, 2024 at 9:26pm
 
freediver wrote on Jun 25th, 2024 at 8:54pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Jun 25th, 2024 at 7:26pm:
freediver wrote on Jun 25th, 2024 at 7:18pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Jun 25th, 2024 at 6:24pm:
freediver wrote on Jun 25th, 2024 at 3:10pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Jun 24th, 2024 at 6:02pm:
freediver wrote on Jun 23rd, 2024 at 5:51pm:
Quote:
Zero -  the extent of your insight into your delusional "freedom values" ideology.


So if the CCP give the Chinese people zero income, then increased that income a million fold, more than any other government on earth, how wealthy would the Chinese people be?

Low IQ?

Zero wealth ...don't tell the 400 million Chinese in the middle class galavanting around the world,  or the 800 billionaires. 

Quote:
LOL. They are   were about 100 years behind the rest of the developed world.


Corrected it for you.

Quote:
They were starving their own citizens to death well after the rest of the world understood why it was happening. They were only able to play catchup because they learned so slowly for a whole century.


So...lifting more than a billion people out of absolute poverty at the fastest rate in history (while India is STILL stuck with 700 milion in absolute povety), wasn't fast enough for you......


Of course not.


Then you are a blind ideologue bent on projecting the failures of delusional "fundamental freedoms' ideology and its egregious effects on the Oz population - as outlined in the Oxfam report (which you continue to ignore, being blind).      

Quote:
Would you prefer your government stop starving its citizens to death before or after you die of starvation?
 

Before, why do you ask such a dumb question?

The relevant  question today (not confusing yourself with events which occured 70 years ago) is why do think the current cost of living crisis and homelessness crisis  in Oz is acceptable?

Quote:
BTW, taking a century to figure out how to not slaughter people by the millions is not fast. It is slow.


Wrong again, it took only 2 decades, from the start of the famine to Deng's reforms which thereafter eradicated poverty faster than any nation in history.


Because you post such incredibly stupid propaganda for the CCP. Taking a century and killing 100 million of your own citizens along the way is not fast learning.


Stupid propaganda?

I'm happy to let the above exchange stand as is; it reveals the shocking incapacity of your blind "freedom values" brain.

It' time to get back to your 'foundations' thread' (which you abandoned), to see if you can save your delusional "freedom values" ideology.


It was money from all those "freedom values" countries that poured into China to lift living standards. All the CCP learned after 100 years and 100 million deaths was to get out of the way and let it happen.


Er... no, it was the in part command economy which enabled China to become the world's factory.

Now the liberal democracies are crying because they can't compete. 
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49091
At my desk.
Re: China: little pinks see merit in 50 million dead
Reply #52 - Jun 26th, 2024 at 5:15am
 
Quote:
Er... no, it was the in part command economy which enabled China to become the world's factory.


It was the command economy that starved 50 million people to death by trying to feed them all equally. It was the liberalising of the economy that lead to the influx of foreign investment and surge in productivity.

Do you think it is reasonable for a government to need to kill nearly 100 million of their own people over about a century in order to "learn" how to run the country? When they are surrounded by other countries showing them how to do it the easy way? How does that make China a meritocracy?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12978
Gender: male
Re: China: little pinks see merit in 50 million dead
Reply #53 - Jun 26th, 2024 at 12:26pm
 
freediver wrote on Jun 26th, 2024 at 5:15am:
Quote:
Er... no, it was the in part command economy which enabled China to become the world's factory.


It was the command economy that starved 50 million people to death by trying to feed them all equally.


Your blind, ugly 'reward according to ability alone' ideology creates your fraudulent narrative "trying to feed them all equally" . (Marx said "from each according to abilty, to each according to need"; you of course worship the reverse).

I already exposed your error some posts back,  your blind,  despicable fraudulent ideology: trying to ensure  sufficient food for all is NOT "trying to feed everyone equally" - another version of the conservative "equality of outcome" lie.   

You keep recycling the same nonsense over and over again, while you - like all conservatives -   insist poverty is 'normal' and can't be eradicted.

You must be hoping people just read the last post, which is why you think you can just keep recycling your despicable ideology over and over.

Deplorable. 


Re "command economy": in fact the dual command-market  econonmy has led to China leading the wolrd  in PVs and EVs, and also SMRs  - the latter failing in the US because private companies can't make a profit out of them, whereas China can support the development of SMRs via state subsidization.

You lose.   


Back to top
« Last Edit: Jun 26th, 2024 at 12:36pm by thegreatdivide »  
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12978
Gender: male
Re: China: little pinks see merit in 50 million dead
Reply #54 - Jun 26th, 2024 at 12:48pm
 
UnSubRocky wrote on Jun 25th, 2024 at 4:59pm:
I am motivated by being politically aware of what goes on in the world. For the last 31 years of my life, I have kept note of how the world treats Western and American influence. Given that you are such a left-wing lunatic, you would be aware of how much hatred the West (and the USA) gets from non-Western societies.


Well deserved hatred, though not recognized by "freedom or death " ideologues like you who reject an effective international rules based system, and so are  always planning for the next war, even demanding the population breed the next crop of cannon fodder.

Bob Carr has nailed it:

tweet

Whatever you think about Assange, the fact is he was imprisoned for one reason: he exposed a bloody war crime committed by US troops against unarmed Iraqi civilians.

All in the name  of defending ideology-based  "foundational freedoms", defended by the "America First" US, of course. 

No thanks.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49091
At my desk.
Re: China: little pinks see merit in 50 million dead
Reply #55 - Jun 26th, 2024 at 4:14pm
 
thegreatdivide wrote on Jun 26th, 2024 at 12:26pm:
freediver wrote on Jun 26th, 2024 at 5:15am:
Quote:
Er... no, it was the in part command economy which enabled China to become the world's factory.


It was the command economy that starved 50 million people to death by trying to feed them all equally.


Your blind, ugly 'reward according to ability alone' ideology creates your fraudulent narrative "trying to feed them all equally" . (Marx said "from each according to abilty, to each according to need"; you of course worship the reverse).

I already exposed your error some posts back,  your blind,  despicable fraudulent ideology: trying to ensure  sufficient food for all is NOT "trying to feed everyone equally" - another version of the conservative "equality of outcome" lie.   

You keep recycling the same nonsense over and over again, while you - like all conservatives -   insist poverty is 'normal' and can't be eradicted.

You must be hoping people just read the last post, which is why you think you can just keep recycling your despicable ideology over and over.

Deplorable. 


Re "command economy": in fact the dual command-market  econonmy has led to China leading the wolrd  in PVs and EVs, and also SMRs  - the latter failing in the US because private companies can't make a profit out of them, whereas China can support the development of SMRs via state subsidization.

You lose.   


What do you think is wrong with my characterization of the Great Chinese Famine as trying to feed them all equally? Was it nothing more than Mao wanting to kill all the wealthy farmers and food merchants, with no end goal in mind?

How much of China's recent increase in standard of living do you think would have been possible without all the foreign money, ideas and technology that flooded in as soon as the CCP removed it's hands from around the neck of the Chinese people?

Do you think it is reasonable for a government to need to kill nearly 100 million of their own people over about a century in order to "learn" how to run the country? When they are surrounded by other countries showing them how to do it the easy way? How does that make China a meritocracy?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
UnSubRocky
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Crocodile Hunter: Origins

Posts: 25008
Rockhampton
Gender: male
Re: China: little pinks see merit in 50 million dead
Reply #56 - Jun 27th, 2024 at 2:37am
 
thegreatdivide,

Quote:
The strictest lockdowns in the world were ancillary to counting deaths in the world's most populous nation (along with India).


I would say that the reason why China stopped counting the number of deaths, let alone infections, from covid related diseases was because it would have been overwhelming to conduct a count. China was not strict on lockdowns. The Chinese did do lockdowns. But, they were not going to stop people from leaving the country.

Australia stopped international travel by March 2020. Melbourne had strict lockdowns. Australia ended up having a low rate of infections up until international travel was reinstated. Then we ended up having quite high rates of infection right around the country.

The United States had a poor record with covid, because some of their citizens had this idea of undeniable rights that allowed them to mingle during their lockdowns. Ergo, the reason for the quick spread of infections. The death toll in the United States (latest figures) are about 1,200,000+ people having died of the coronavirus related illness. Australia lost 24,000+ people to coronavirus. We have a better health care system in Australian than America or China. The Americans go on about their rights. The Chinese have few rights. And although we have rights, we earn to keep these rights by acting responsibly.

Regarding tgd's gullibility of China's lockdowns --
tgd: Quote:
No, what gve you that idea?


The way you went on about China having strict lockdowns as a reason for their infection control, after I went on about China not counting their dead after "a while" after the coronavirus outbreak began. If you are gullible enough to think China arrested their coronavirus infections, you really need to step away and think things through. Otherwise, people will see you as "the spokesperson for the CCP".

Quote:
In 5000 years China has waxed and waned according to sovereignty disputes on adjoining lands, it has never colonized overseas countries (except Taiwan which is 100 kms from the mainland).


China is also about 75 years old as one country. China had been colonising other countries by sending their people and creating "Chinatowns" in white majority countries. Other than Japan, there are very few non-white majority countries that allow this to happen. If the Chinese wanted to take over Taiwan, they would. But the undercurrent of democratic movement is starting to take on China. The government won't have much support to take over Taiwan soon.

Quote:
he UN - with its 'One China' policy - doesn't include China in its list of colonizing or occupying powers.


That is irrelevant to what I said with my belief about China breaking up into several countries inside the next 10 years. It happened with the Soviet Union. It will happen with China. Democratic change will ensure the dissolution of China.

Quote:
You should be calling out their insistence on global hegemony, involving them in countless proxy  wars since WW2, including the present Ukraine war. (See what Nigel Farage has to say about it).


The United States are having fewer and fewer new recruits for their military every year. The Americans had to pull out of Afghanistan because of the Ukraine issue about was to take effect. The USA has a lot of smart people over there that invest in places all over the world. I have to agree with you about most wars in the world are provoked by the USA.

Quote:
Yep, you have fallen for the "China threat" theory.


So? If China stops buying our exports, we are in for a hell of a time finding replacement trading partners. And if we piss off the Chinese with inquisitions and other insults, we are going to get the arse for trading with China. Scott Morrison has shown us how hypersensitive the Chinese government can be.

Quote:
so why do 4 to 5 billion people despise the US- led West?


They don't. They just have a problem with the United States (which is more "sub-Western" than "Western") due to the USA bombing their countries and killing innocent civilians. "Western" countries are the envy for many of those 4 to 5 billion people who earn no more than a third of what the average Americans earn. Central Americans like to move to places like the USA to get away from their failed states. But Asians, Middle Eastern, Arab and African people prefer to move to Europe.

USR: Quote:
I disagree with the "One China" policy. China can simply work with Taiwan and Hong Kong as separate entities and not engage in hostilities.


tgd: Quote:
So you are insisting the Chinese people in HK and Taiwan be divided by ideology, with the loony "freedom values" mob free to claim sovereignty and separate from the motherland.

No nation would accept it.   


No. I was suggesting that China remain China without the acquisition of Taiwan. Hong Kong is an autonomous state -- and they even have Olympians representing HK as a nation. Hong Kong has its problems of refugees moving to HK from mainland China. The refugees are trying to escape the suppressive China.

Quote:
Just to let you know, if that situation ever arises as a result of US global hegemonic desires, I'l be coming for you, not China.


Aha. We have a treasonable person called "thegreatdivide" here at OzPolitic. I get the feeling your stomach growls when a dog barks.

The United States has its hands full with other matters. A war with China would be disastrous.
Back to top
 

At this stage...
WWW  
IP Logged
 
UnSubRocky
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Crocodile Hunter: Origins

Posts: 25008
Rockhampton
Gender: male
Re: China: little pinks see merit in 50 million dead
Reply #57 - Jun 27th, 2024 at 2:45am
 
Quote:
Bingo, you delusional "freedom or death" war-mongering  ideologue.

Obviously the Anzacs died in vain...while you are intent on breeding the next crop of cannon fodder.


My great uncle fought in New Guinea during WW2. He did not go to his grave -- many years later -- thinking that he wasted his time fighting to keep Australia free of the Japanese. And Uncle James would be rolling in his grave if he found out that we stood by and did nothing to trying and pressure China to back off Taiwan. I can imagine him shaking his head in disbelief if Australia lost trade with China with new deals struck with PNG.

I doubt that my daughters would participate in WW3, even though one of them is an army reservist. But, the likes of you (you CCP spokesperson) would lead us being overrun with worthless refugees from all over the world, so that wages would fall relative to the cost of living. Then the Chinese might want to bargain for better deals for our natural resources.
Back to top
 

At this stage...
WWW  
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12978
Gender: male
Re: China: little pinks see merit in 50 million dead
Reply #58 - Jun 27th, 2024 at 12:44pm
 
freediver wrote on Jun 26th, 2024 at 4:14pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Jun 26th, 2024 at 12:26pm:
freediver wrote on Jun 26th, 2024 at 5:15am:
Quote:
Er... no, it was the in part command economy which enabled China to become the world's factory.


It was the command economy that starved 50 million people to death by trying to feed them all equally.


Your blind, ugly 'reward according to ability alone' ideology creates your fraudulent narrative "trying to feed them all equally" . (Marx said "from each according to abilty, to each according to need"; you of course worship the reverse).

I already exposed your error some posts back,  your blind,  despicable fraudulent ideology: trying to ensure  sufficient food for all is NOT "trying to feed everyone equally" - another version of the conservative "equality of outcome" lie.   

You keep recycling the same nonsense over and over again, while you - like all conservatives -   insist poverty is 'normal' and can't be eradicted.

You must be hoping people just read the last post, which is why you think you can just keep recycling your despicable ideology over and over.

Deplorable. 

Re "command economy": in fact the dual command-market  econonmy has led to China leading the wolrd  in PVs and EVs, and also SMRs  - the latter failing in the US because private companies can't make a profit out of them, whereas China can support the development of SMRs via state subsidization.

You lose.   


What do you think is wrong with my characterization of the Great Chinese Famine as trying to feed them all equally?


Can't you read?

"I already exposed your error some posts back, ( a reflection of) your blind,  despicable fraudulent ideology: trying to ensure  sufficient food for all is NOT "trying to feed everyone equally" - another version of the conservative "equality of outcome" lie.   


So you need further explanation (assuming you CAN read)?

Let it sink in this time. The goal of poverty eradication is NOT the same as  the Right's strawman aka  "equality of outcome".

In an absolute-poverty/subsistence agriculture nation with frequent shortages of food, the first requirement is to increase the food supply, not to "feed everyone equally", but to ensure the nation increases its productivity and produces enough food.

The CCP, as professed followers of Marxism, strove to lift ALL the people out of poverty, not just some as was the norm in capitalist states; but the CCP had no guidelines  how to achive a socialist revolution in  China (Marx was concerned with the economies of industrial nations).

You of course are a deluded" freedom" ideolgue who thinks  self-interested free individuals will magically  create common prosperity in free markets with minimal government ownership of the nation's resources.

But the chickens are coming home to roost: Macron is warning of civil war in France, and in the US:

(Daily Mail)

Texas secessionist names 5 states he's working with to bust up America

Texas' top secessionist has revealed he's working with pro-independence groups in five US states to break up the union.

Daniel Miller, president of the Texas Nationalist Movement (TNM), says he's hatching plans with self-rule activists in California, New Hampshire, Alaska, Florida, and Louisiana.


Ah -- the joys of "freedom" and democratic elections


Quote:
How much of China's recent increase in standard of living do you think would have been possible without all the foreign money, ideas and technology that flooded in as soon as the CCP removed it's hands from around the neck of the Chinese people?


Most of it: it was the hard work of the Chinese people governed by a single authority which increased the standard of living, after China became the world's factory. 

Quote:
Do you think it is reasonable for a government to need to kill nearly 100 million of their own people over about a century in order to "learn" how to run the country? When they are surrounded by other countries showing them how to do it the easy way? How does that make China a meritocracy?


A mostly blind "freedom" ideologues'  narrative:

re "the easy way":

(google)

Since 1990, income inequality has increased in most developed countries and in some middle-income countries, including China and India. While inequality has gone up in the majority of countries over the past three decades, it has fallen in a few.

But in China, absolute poverty has been eradicated, whereas in Oz, homlessness is increasing, home ownership is falling, and rents are increasingly unaffordable.. oh, and demand on food charities has never been higher.   

The "easy way", indeed...... 


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12978
Gender: male
Re: China: little pinks see merit in 50 million dead
Reply #59 - Jun 27th, 2024 at 1:35pm
 
UnSubRocky wrote on Jun 27th, 2024 at 2:37am:
[quote]I would say that the reason why China stopped counting the number of deaths, let alone infections, from covid related diseases was because it would have been overwhelming to conduct a count. China was not strict on lockdowns. The Chinese did do lockdowns. But, they were not going to stop people from leaving the country.


If you say so. I recall the West's media having a field-day  with people's doors being welded shut in China. 

Quote:
The United States had a poor record with covid, because some of their citizens had this idea of undeniable rights that allowed them to mingle during their lockdowns. [quote]  Ergo, the reason for the quick spread of infections.


In contrast to China where the government welded doors shut....

Quote:
The death toll in the United States (latest figures) are about 1,200,000+ people having died of the coronavirus related illness. Australia lost 24,000+ people to coronavirus. We have a better health care system in Australian than America or China. The Americans go on about their rights. The Chinese have few rights. And although we have rights, we earn to keep these rights by acting responsibly.


Agree, except for your concept of "rights". Obviously the right to prosperous participation in the nation's affairs  is worth more than the right to vote in (mostly) inconsequential elections. 

Quote:
If you are gullible enough to think China arrested their coronavirus infections, you really need to step away and think things through. Otherwise, people will see you as "the spokesperson for the CCP".


How many died from Covid, in China?   

Quote:
China is also about 75 years old as one country.


Factually wrong: China reached it's greatest-ever extent as one country c.1750, under the Qing dynasty (including all of Mongolia).   

Quote:
China had been colonising other countries by sending their people and creating "Chinatowns" in white majority countries


Wrong again; "Chinatowns" never claimed sovereignty (aka 'colonization') over the host cities.

Quote:
  If the Chinese wanted to take over Taiwan, they would. But the undercurrent of democratic movement is starting to take on China. The government won't have much support to take over Taiwan soon.


Er....the Pentagon is stopping a Chinese "takeover" of Taiwan. China can live with it unless the US recognizes Taiwan as an independent natioin, then all bets would be off.

Then you'll have a chance to send your cannon-fodder offspring to the Taiwan Strait....

Quote:
That is irrelevant to what I said with my belief about China breaking up into several countries inside the next 10 years. It happened with the Soviet Union. It will happen with China. Democratic change will ensure the dissolution of China.


Wrong again; the US will break up before China: see my previous  post to FD. The Soviet economy was never more than half that of the US, whereas  China is much more powerful and rapidly approaching parity with the US.

Quote:
I have to agree with you about most wars in the world are provoked by the USA.


Thanks. 

Quote:
So? If China stops buying our exports, we are in for a hell of a time finding replacement trading partners. And if we piss off the Chinese with inquisitions and other insults, we are going to get the arse for trading with China. Scott Morrison has shown us how hypersensitive the Chinese government can be.


But China wanted to trade with us; things first turned sour in 2017 when Turnbull blocked Huawei at the behest of the Pentagon on trumped up "security' concerns, and Morrison cemented the ill-will with nuclear subs designed to prevent China's assertion of its (UN recognized) sovereignty over Taiwan.

Hence the bs about a "China threat" which has Oz spending half a $trillion on subs and frigates .... losers.

Some highspeed rail would be much more useful\, even Indonesia has 142 kms (built by China of course); Oz is still talking about a Sydney-Newcastle line.

cont.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 
Send Topic Print