thegreatdivide,
Quote:The strictest lockdowns in the world were ancillary to counting deaths in the world's most populous nation (along with India).
I would say that the reason why China stopped counting the number of deaths, let alone infections, from covid related diseases was because it would have been overwhelming to conduct a count. China was not strict on lockdowns. The Chinese did do lockdowns. But, they were not going to stop people from leaving the country.
Australia stopped international travel by March 2020. Melbourne had strict lockdowns. Australia ended up having a low rate of infections up until international travel was reinstated. Then we ended up having quite high rates of infection right around the country.
The United States had a poor record with covid, because some of their citizens had this idea of undeniable
rights that allowed them to mingle during their lockdowns. Ergo, the reason for the quick spread of infections. The death toll in the United States (latest figures) are about 1,200,000+ people having died of the coronavirus related illness. Australia lost 24,000+ people to coronavirus. We have a better health care system in Australian than America or China. The Americans go on about their rights. The Chinese have few rights. And although we have rights, we earn to keep these rights by acting responsibly.
Regarding tgd's gullibility of China's lockdowns --
tgd:
Quote:No, what gve you that idea?
The way you went on about China having strict lockdowns as a reason for their infection control, after I went on about China not counting their dead after "a while" after the coronavirus outbreak began. If you are gullible enough to think China arrested their coronavirus infections, you really need to step away and think things through. Otherwise, people will see you as "the spokesperson for the CCP".
Quote:In 5000 years China has waxed and waned according to sovereignty disputes on adjoining lands, it has never colonized overseas countries (except Taiwan which is 100 kms from the mainland).
China is also about 75 years old as one country. China had been colonising other countries by sending their people and creating "Chinatowns" in white majority countries. Other than Japan, there are very few non-white majority countries that allow this to happen. If the Chinese wanted to take over Taiwan, they would. But the undercurrent of democratic movement is starting to take on China. The government won't have much support to take over Taiwan soon.
Quote:he UN - with its 'One China' policy - doesn't include China in its list of colonizing or occupying powers.
That is irrelevant to what I said with my belief about China breaking up into several countries inside the next 10 years. It happened with the Soviet Union. It will happen with China. Democratic change will ensure the dissolution of China.
Quote:You should be calling out their insistence on global hegemony, involving them in countless proxy wars since WW2, including the present Ukraine war. (See what Nigel Farage has to say about it).
The United States are having fewer and fewer new recruits for their military every year. The Americans had to pull out of Afghanistan because of the Ukraine issue about was to take effect. The USA has a lot of smart people over there that invest in places all over the world. I have to agree with you about most wars in the world are provoked by the USA.
Quote:Yep, you have fallen for the "China threat" theory.
So? If China stops buying our exports, we are in for a hell of a time finding replacement trading partners. And if we piss off the Chinese with inquisitions and other insults, we are going to get the arse for trading with China. Scott Morrison has shown us how hypersensitive the Chinese government can be.
Quote:so why do 4 to 5 billion people despise the US- led West?
They don't. They just have a problem with the United States (which is more "sub-Western" than "Western") due to the USA bombing their countries and killing innocent civilians. "Western" countries are the envy for many of those 4 to 5 billion people who earn no more than a third of what the average Americans earn. Central Americans like to move to places like the USA to get away from their failed states. But Asians, Middle Eastern, Arab and African people prefer to move to Europe.
USR:
Quote:I disagree with the "One China" policy. China can simply work with Taiwan and Hong Kong as separate entities and not engage in hostilities.
tgd:
Quote:So you are insisting the Chinese people in HK and Taiwan be divided by ideology, with the loony "freedom values" mob free to claim sovereignty and separate from the motherland.
No nation would accept it.
No. I was suggesting that China remain China without the acquisition of Taiwan. Hong Kong is an autonomous state -- and they even have Olympians representing HK as a nation. Hong Kong has its problems of refugees moving to HK from mainland China. The refugees are trying to escape the suppressive China.
Quote:Just to let you know, if that situation ever arises as a result of US global hegemonic desires, I'l be coming for you, not China.
Aha. We have a treasonable person called "thegreatdivide" here at OzPolitic. I get the feeling your stomach growls when a dog barks.
The United States has its hands full with other matters. A war with China would be disastrous.