Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 20 21 22 23 24 ... 73
Send Topic Print
Zionism (Read 26317 times)
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 46380
Gender: male
Re: Zionism
Reply #315 - Feb 21st, 2023 at 11:13am
 
thegreatdivide wrote on Feb 21st, 2023 at 10:45am:
Frank wrote on Feb 20th, 2023 at 8:33pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Feb 20th, 2023 at 12:50pm:
Frank wrote on Feb 20th, 2023 at 12:09pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Feb 20th, 2023 at 12:04pm:
freediver wrote on Feb 18th, 2023 at 1:20pm:
Do you agree with this claim?


Rabin's murderer took his motivation from the OT (with it's "Promised Land" mythology ...ie, land gained by genocide leading up to David's conquest of Jerusalem), even though the OT authorizes bronze-age genocide.

So we have a problem ...today; hence the UNSC is currently drawing a 'consensus' resolution to condemn illegal Israeli settlements in the occupied WB.

...whether or not I agree with your assertion that OT-authorized genocide is confined to the bronze-age.

So, while I can agree with your statement that genocide in the OT refers to bronze age Hebrews conquests, I can't agree with RW Israeli settler assertions (based on OT "Promised Land" mythology) re WB settlements today.   


How is the Promised Land mythology any worse than the Aboriginal First Nations sovereignty mythology?


They are both problematic.  But the former pits 1.5 billion Muslims against Israel....with global implications for global peace and "terrorism".      

Quote:
If the Jews have no right to Israel, why do Aborigines have any right to Australia? Or Red Indians to the Americas?


The UN decided to partition BM Palestine - defining the extent of the Jewish "right" to 'Israel'.




But the sons of Mohammed, with no veto power, didnt accept it. They started a war the next day.

So much for your UN world government, silly bozo.


They "started a war the next day", BECAUSE international law wasn't developed to the extent required to prevent war as a method of dispute settlement, under the auspices of a UN which had been created only a year before the UN-sponsored partitioning of BM Palestine.

(In fact the veto demanded by the US and USSR in 1946 crippled the effective operation of the UNSC from the start).

Not to mention   Robert Skidelsky's  recent article in which he noted:

Letter: The economic conditions that make wars more likely

https://www.ft.com/content/d87d1d35-3272-490a-b8cc-e6a33de75ac3

and his reference to Keynes' 1944 "clearing union" concept designed to engender prosperous development in all nations, rejected by the triumphalist US.

See how your individual/national sovereignty delusions lead you astray?




So the Arabs started the war the next day because they were led astray by their individual/national delusions and quite possibly by neoliberal evil ideology that lacked MMT and JG at the  time.

The Russians, too, are just looking for meaningful work in Ukraine.

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49062
At my desk.
Re: Zionism
Reply #316 - Feb 21st, 2023 at 7:03pm
 
thegreatdivide wrote on Feb 21st, 2023 at 10:45am:
Frank wrote on Feb 20th, 2023 at 8:33pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Feb 20th, 2023 at 12:50pm:
Frank wrote on Feb 20th, 2023 at 12:09pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Feb 20th, 2023 at 12:04pm:
freediver wrote on Feb 18th, 2023 at 1:20pm:
Do you agree with this claim?


Rabin's murderer took his motivation from the OT (with it's "Promised Land" mythology ...ie, land gained by genocide leading up to David's conquest of Jerusalem), even though the OT authorizes bronze-age genocide.

So we have a problem ...today; hence the UNSC is currently drawing a 'consensus' resolution to condemn illegal Israeli settlements in the occupied WB.

...whether or not I agree with your assertion that OT-authorized genocide is confined to the bronze-age.

So, while I can agree with your statement that genocide in the OT refers to bronze age Hebrews conquests, I can't agree with RW Israeli settler assertions (based on OT "Promised Land" mythology) re WB settlements today.   


How is the Promised Land mythology any worse than the Aboriginal First Nations sovereignty mythology?


They are both problematic.  But the former pits 1.5 billion Muslims against Israel....with global implications for global peace and "terrorism".      

Quote:
If the Jews have no right to Israel, why do Aborigines have any right to Australia? Or Red Indians to the Americas?


The UN decided to partition BM Palestine - defining the extent of the Jewish "right" to 'Israel'.




But the sons of Mohammed, with no veto power, didnt accept it. They started a war the next day.

So much for your UN world government, silly bozo.


They "started a war the next day", BECAUSE international law wasn't developed to the extent required to prevent war as a method of dispute settlement, under the auspices of a UN which had been created only a year before the UN-sponsored partitioning of BM Palestine.

(In fact the veto demanded by the US and USSR in 1946 crippled the effective operation of the UNSC from the start).

Not to mention   Robert Skidelsky's  recent article in which he noted:

Letter: The economic conditions that make wars more likely

https://www.ft.com/content/d87d1d35-3272-490a-b8cc-e6a33de75ac3

and his reference to Keynes' 1944 "clearing union" concept designed to engender prosperous development in all nations, rejected by the triumphalist US.

See how your individual/national sovereignty delusions lead you astray?



Grin

It's everyone's fault but the Arabs that they froth at the mouth at the thought of a Jewish state on Muslim land.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12963
Gender: male
Re: Zionism
Reply #317 - Feb 21st, 2023 at 8:43pm
 
freediver wrote on Feb 21st, 2023 at 7:03pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Feb 21st, 2023 at 10:45am:
Frank wrote on Feb 20th, 2023 at 8:33pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Feb 20th, 2023 at 12:50pm:
Frank wrote on Feb 20th, 2023 at 12:09pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Feb 20th, 2023 at 12:04pm:
freediver wrote on Feb 18th, 2023 at 1:20pm:
Do you agree with this claim?


Rabin's murderer took his motivation from the OT (with it's "Promised Land" mythology ...ie, land gained by genocide leading up to David's conquest of Jerusalem), even though the OT authorizes bronze-age genocide.

So we have a problem ...today; hence the UNSC is currently drawing a 'consensus' resolution to condemn illegal Israeli settlements in the occupied WB.

...whether or not I agree with your assertion that OT-authorized genocide is confined to the bronze-age.

So, while I can agree with your statement that genocide in the OT refers to bronze age Hebrews conquests, I can't agree with RW Israeli settler assertions (based on OT "Promised Land" mythology) re WB settlements today.   


How is the Promised Land mythology any worse than the Aboriginal First Nations sovereignty mythology?


They are both problematic.  But the former pits 1.5 billion Muslims against Israel....with global implications for global peace and "terrorism".      

Quote:
If the Jews have no right to Israel, why do Aborigines have any right to Australia? Or Red Indians to the Americas?


The UN decided to partition BM Palestine - defining the extent of the Jewish "right" to 'Israel'.




But the sons of Mohammed, with no veto power, didnt accept it. They started a war the next day.

So much for your UN world government, silly bozo.


They "started a war the next day", BECAUSE international law wasn't developed to the extent required to prevent war as a method of dispute settlement, under the auspices of a UN which had been created only a year before the UN-sponsored partitioning of BM Palestine.

(In fact the veto demanded by the US and USSR in 1946 crippled the effective operation of the UNSC from the start).

Not to mention   Robert Skidelsky's  recent article in which he noted:

Letter: The economic conditions that make wars more likely

https://www.ft.com/content/d87d1d35-3272-490a-b8cc-e6a33de75ac3

and his reference to Keynes' 1944 "clearing union" concept designed to engender prosperous development in all nations, rejected by the triumphalist US.

See how your individual/national sovereignty delusions lead you astray?



Grin

It's everyone's fault but the Arabs that they froth at the mouth at the thought of a Jewish state on Muslim land.


No - all our faults, including Arabs. 

An ICJ can sort out all this nonsense, and outlaw war at the same time.

But my post went straight over your head, so you blame the other bloke as usual, while claiming purity for yourself. 
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49062
At my desk.
Re: Zionism
Reply #318 - Feb 21st, 2023 at 9:28pm
 
Quote:
An ICJ can sort out all this nonsense, and outlaw war at the same time.


What a brilliant idea. We just have to outlaw war. Should we credit the CCP with this one?

Quote:
They "started a war the next day", BECAUSE international law wasn't developed


They started a war because a "Jewish" nation is an affront to the supremacism ideology of Islam.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12963
Gender: male
Re: Zionism
Reply #319 - Feb 22nd, 2023 at 11:48am
 
freediver wrote on Feb 21st, 2023 at 9:28pm:
Quote:
An ICJ can sort out all this nonsense, and outlaw war at the same time.


What a brilliant idea. We just have to outlaw war. Should we credit the CCP with this one?


No. We should credit 'Doc' Evatt, former ALP leader and High Court judge - who knew a thing or two about law....

He resisted adoption of the veto by the UNSC powers during the founding of the UN Charter (and had the support of the delegates from smaller countries present at that founding conference).

Quote:
"They "started a war the next day", BECAUSE international law wasn't developed

They started a war because a "Jewish" nation is an affront to the supremacism ideology of Islam.


Both statements are correct (though the Arab world wouldn't have cared if Israel had been created in Oz or the US, rather than Palestine). 

The difference between us is I recognize the need for international law, you don't.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Feb 22nd, 2023 at 12:51pm by thegreatdivide »  
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49062
At my desk.
Re: Zionism
Reply #320 - Feb 22nd, 2023 at 6:15pm
 
Quote:
The difference between us is I recognize the need for international law, you don't.


The difference is I am not absurdly naive about international law.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
wombatwoody
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3210
Wombat  NSW
Re: Zionism
Reply #321 - Feb 23rd, 2023 at 12:03am
 
freediver wrote on Feb 17th, 2023 at 7:54pm:
Quote:
Then explain how it is not calling for genocide.


It appears to be "calling" for the genocide of a group of people who no longer exist.


Look, the professor clearly states,

'Influential rabbis, who have a considerable following among Israeli army officers, identify the Palestinians (or even all Arabs) with those ancient nations, so that commands like "thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth" [56] acquire a topical meaning. In fact, it is not uncommon for reserve soldiers called up to do a tour of duty in the Gaza Strip to be given an "educational lecture" in which they are told that the Palestinians of Gaza are "like the Amalekites."


Quote:
So, a far cry from what you claimed



What's this then?

'Biblical verses exhorting to genocide of the Midianites [57] were solemnly quoted by an important Israeli rabbi in justification of the Qibbiya massacre...

57. Numbers 31:13-20; note in particular verse 17: "Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him." '

And:

"There was the very influential sociologist and Biblical scholar, Yehezkiel Kaufman, an advocate of genocide on the model of the Book of Joshua, the idealist philosopher Hugo Shmuel Bergman, who as far back as 1914-15 advocated the expulsion of all Palestinians to Iraq, and many others."  -  Prof. Shahak, Chapter 2.  Prejudice and Prevarication

And there are many more, These verses were favorites of Rabbi Meir Kahane:

I Samuel 15:

3 Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy all that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys.’”

18 And he sent you on a mission, saying, ‘Go and completely destroy those wicked people, the Amalekites; wage war against them until you have wiped them out.’


Numbers 33:50-53:

50 And the LORD spake unto Moses in the plains of Moab by Jordan near Jericho, saying, 51 Speak unto the children of Israel, and say unto them, When ye are passed over Jordan into the land of Canaan; 52 Then ye shall drive out all the inhabitants of the land from before you, and destroy all their pictures, and destroy all their molten images, and quite pluck down all their high places: 53 And ye shall dispossess the inhabitants of the land, and dwell therein: for I have given you the land to possess it.

"the Palestinians of Gaza are "like the Amalekites"

Rabbi Israel Hess - Genocide: A Commandment of the Torah

'On February 26, 1980, Bat Kol, the student publication of Bar-Ilan University, published an article by Hess titled "Genocide: A Commandment of the Torah" (also translated as "The Mitzvah of Genocide in the Torah") in which, according to Karen Armstrong, he argued that the Palestinians "deserved the same fate as the Amalekites".[1][2] The article is an explanation of the commandment in Deuteronomy 25:17 to "obliterate the memory of Amalek".[2] According to Eric Yoffie, Hess wrote that this "requires the killing of babes and sucklings, and forbids the showing of mercy".[2] According to David Hirst, Hess wrote that "the day will come when we shall all be called upon to wage this war for the annihilation of Amalek" in order to ensure "racial purity" and because of "the antagonism between Israel and Amalek as an expression of the antagonism between light and darkness, the pure and the unclean".[3]

'In 2004, Shulamit Aloni, writing in Haaretz, said of Hess' article, "It's no coincidence that in the settlements the Palestinians are called 'Amalek', and the intention is obvious to everyone".[4] '

- Israel Hess, Wikipedia

"the Palestinians of Gaza are "like the Amalekites"

Back to top
 

We are benefiting from ... the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon, and the American struggle in Iraq.

Benjamin Netanyahu, quoted in Ma’ariv, 16 April 2008
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 48607
Gender: male
Re: Zionism
Reply #322 - Feb 23rd, 2023 at 6:57am
 
Wonder if the Palestinians are shuffled into gas chambers?
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49062
At my desk.
Re: Zionism
Reply #323 - Feb 23rd, 2023 at 7:05am
 
Quote:
Influential rabbis, who have a considerable following among Israeli army officers, identify the Palestinians (or even all Arabs) with those ancient nations


Do these "Influential rabbis" have a name?

And are they actually offering an interpretation of the text?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
issuevoter
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 9200
The Great State of Mind
Gender: male
Re: Zionism
Reply #324 - Feb 23rd, 2023 at 7:46am
 
Ain't religion a boon to humanity!!!!!
Back to top
 

No political allegiance. No philosophy. No religion.
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12963
Gender: male
Re: Zionism
Reply #325 - Feb 23rd, 2023 at 11:56am
 
freediver wrote on Feb 22nd, 2023 at 6:15pm:
Quote:
The difference between us is I recognize the need for international law, you don't.


The difference is I am not absurdly naive about international law.


translation: I accept war as the means to settle disputes between nations.

Good luck......in the age of MAD....
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49062
At my desk.
Re: Zionism
Reply #326 - Feb 23rd, 2023 at 9:22pm
 
thegreatdivide wrote on Feb 23rd, 2023 at 11:56am:
freediver wrote on Feb 22nd, 2023 at 6:15pm:
Quote:
The difference between us is I recognize the need for international law, you don't.


The difference is I am not absurdly naive about international law.


translation: I accept war as the means to settle disputes between nations.

Good luck......in the age of MAD....


Do you have reading comprehension difficulties?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12963
Gender: male
Re: Zionism
Reply #327 - Feb 23rd, 2023 at 9:52pm
 
freediver wrote on Feb 23rd, 2023 at 9:22pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Feb 23rd, 2023 at 11:56am:
freediver wrote on Feb 22nd, 2023 at 6:15pm:
Quote:
The difference between us is I recognize the need for international law, you don't.


The difference is I am not absurdly naive about international law.


translation: you accept war as the means to settle disputes between nations.

Good luck......in the age of MAD....


Do you have reading comprehension difficulties?


No, but your contempt for life is palpable: live by the sword, die by the sword.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 48607
Gender: male
Re: Zionism
Reply #328 - Feb 23rd, 2023 at 10:49pm
 
The Military Empire of Israel is rising.
The Religion of Judaism is falling.

The Military Empire of Islam is falling.
The Religion of Mohommedism is rising.

Christianity will die for both of their sins when they unite as One.
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49062
At my desk.
Re: Zionism
Reply #329 - Feb 24th, 2023 at 7:16am
 
thegreatdivide wrote on Feb 23rd, 2023 at 9:52pm:
freediver wrote on Feb 23rd, 2023 at 9:22pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Feb 23rd, 2023 at 11:56am:
freediver wrote on Feb 22nd, 2023 at 6:15pm:
Quote:
The difference between us is I recognize the need for international law, you don't.


The difference is I am not absurdly naive about international law.


translation: you accept war as the means to settle disputes between nations.

Good luck......in the age of MAD....


Do you have reading comprehension difficulties?


No, but your contempt for life is palpable: live by the sword, die by the sword.


Perhaps you are just on a different planet.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 20 21 22 23 24 ... 73
Send Topic Print