Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 ... 9
Send Topic Print
The basis against Racism (Read 6248 times)
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 40817
The basis against Racism
Jan 1st, 2023 at 3:38pm
 
Quote:
Here, enslaved people were beneath even the human desire for freedom. They had to be diseased.

This thinking would thrive in the 18th and especially the 19th centuries. It would mutate, vary in perversion and persevere for 400 years right up to the present day. Starting with theories of physical and intellectual inferiority that likened blacks to animals — monkeys and apes especially — or helpless children, it would evolve to infer black cultural and then social inferiority.

“What black inferiority meant has changed in every generation . . . but ultimately Americans have been making the same case,” said historian Ibram X. Kendi.

Such thought exists today with pernicious assumptions about the current nature of black life and black people, still featuring age-old racist references to blacks as animals. It persists despite the advent of modern DNA science, which has shown race to be fundamentally a social construct. Humans, as it turns out, share about 99.9 percent of their DNA with each other, and outward physical characteristics such as hair texture and skin color, about which racists have long obsessed, occupy just a tiny portion of the human genome.

[Source]

Who persistly posts such bullshit about Indigenous Australians, continually, post after post?  Matty, Soren, Gnads. of course.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 83705
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: The basis against Racism
Reply #1 - Jan 1st, 2023 at 3:44pm
 
Never noticed that Stan the Tan was Indigenous or Ray Martin or whatever... I'm kind of the Martin Luther King of Australiadom ... now I'd like some of these twerps to not notice that I'm white and call me nasty names.... I have a dream.... and all of you have some very serious problems, Houston....
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 83705
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: The basis against Racism
Reply #2 - Jan 1st, 2023 at 3:45pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Jan 1st, 2023 at 3:38pm:
Quote:
Here, enslaved people were beneath even the human desire for freedom. They had to be diseased.

This thinking would thrive in the 18th and especially the 19th centuries. It would mutate, vary in perversion and persevere for 400 years right up to the present day. Starting with theories of physical and intellectual inferiority that likened blacks to animals — monkeys and apes especially — or helpless children, it would evolve to infer black cultural and then social inferiority.

“What black inferiority meant has changed in every generation . . . but ultimately Americans have been making the same case,” said historian Ibram X. Kendi.

Such thought exists today with pernicious assumptions about the current nature of black life and black people, still featuring age-old racist references to blacks as animals. It persists despite the advent of modern DNA science, which has shown race to be fundamentally a social construct. Humans, as it turns out, share about 99.9 percent of their DNA with each other, and outward physical characteristics such as hair texture and skin color, about which racists have long obsessed, occupy just a tiny portion of the human genome.

[Source]

Who persistly posts such bullshit about Indigenous Australians, continually, post after post?  Matty, Soren, Gnads. of course.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes



Pretty old and worn-out nonsense that, Brian.
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Boris
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3977
Gender: male
Re: The basis against Racism
Reply #3 - Jan 1st, 2023 at 4:01pm
 
I judge people according to their behaviour

And what I have seen with my own eyes


Indigenous people are 15 to 20 times more likely to commit violent offences than non-Indigenous people according to research released today.

The Australian Institute of Criminology analysed police data from Western Australia and South Australia and national murder rates.

The Institute's Director, Dr Adam Tomison says the study found violent offending is linked to illicit drug use, childhood violence, exposure to pornography and socioeconomic disadvantage.

But he says alcohol is by far the biggest cause of violent offending by indigenous people.

"Leaving aside all these issues of disadvantage, alcohol still comes up as a major factor for people committing crimes, violent crimes, that's what we actually found " Dr Tomison said.

"So there is a disadvantage issue but there is also, above and beyond that, whether you are disadvantaged or not ... an alcohol issue. Alcohol is fuelling a lot of the crime."

The new study also found Indigenous women are five times more likely to commit a violent offence than non-indigenous men.

"If you look at that data, what you find is Aboriginal females or Indigenous females are committing crimes 35 times more often than non-Indigenous females and five times more often than non-Indigenous males," Dr Tomison said.

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?action=post;num=1672551528;virboard=;tit...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 40817
Re: The basis against Racism
Reply #4 - Jan 1st, 2023 at 4:12pm
 
...

Yeah, sure, Matty, sure, whatever.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Boris
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3977
Gender: male
Re: The basis against Racism
Reply #5 - Jan 1st, 2023 at 4:20pm
 
You have never been there or seen it or had to deal with it day in and day out

you would not know crap from clay

You are a Useful idiot for the Soviets

So according to you this is meaningless or lies?

Indigenous people are 15 to 20 times more likely to commit violent offences than non-Indigenous people according to research released today.

Can you watch this and tell me it is OK?


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 40817
Re: The basis against Racism
Reply #6 - Jan 1st, 2023 at 4:27pm
 
...

Yeah, sure, Matty, sure, whatever.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 102864
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: The basis against Racism
Reply #7 - Jan 1st, 2023 at 4:57pm
 

...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 44409
Gender: male
Re: The basis against Racism
Reply #8 - Jan 1st, 2023 at 5:24pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Jan 1st, 2023 at 3:38pm:
Quote:
Here, enslaved people were beneath even the human desire for freedom. They had to be diseased.

This thinking would thrive in the 18th and especially the 19th centuries. It would mutate, vary in perversion and persevere for 400 years right up to the present day. Starting with theories of physical and intellectual inferiority that likened blacks to animals — monkeys and apes especially — or helpless children, it would evolve to infer black cultural and then social inferiority.

“What black inferiority meant has changed in every generation . . . but ultimately Americans have been making the same case,” said historian Ibram X. Kendi.

Such thought exists today with pernicious assumptions about the current nature of black life and black people, still featuring age-old racist references to blacks as animals. It persists despite the advent of modern DNA science, which has shown race to be fundamentally a social construct. Humans, as it turns out, share about 99.9 percent of their DNA with each other, and outward physical characteristics such as hair texture and skin color, about which racists have long obsessed, occupy just a tiny portion of the human genome.

[Source]

Who persistly posts such bullshit about Indigenous Australians, continually, post after post?  Matty, Soren, Gnads. of course.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

...

Yeah, sure, Cockwomble Bbwian, sure, whatever.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 40817
Re: The basis against Racism
Reply #9 - Jan 1st, 2023 at 5:43pm
 
...

Oh, dearie, dearie, me, not terribly original, Soren.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 44409
Gender: male
Re: The basis against Racism
Reply #10 - Jan 1st, 2023 at 8:19pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Jan 1st, 2023 at 5:43pm:
https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img923/5536/WEbaRN.png

Oh, dearie, dearie, me, not terribly original, Soren.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

No it isn't- yet you do it hundreds of times, lost cockwomble.

Why do you do it if it's so unoriginal? Why are you such an unoriginal, tedious mong? What do you like about being an inane, inarticulate Doctor of   Tired Mindless Shite?


What fascinates you about posting the same moronic shite hundreds of times?

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 40817
Re: The basis against Racism
Reply #11 - Jan 2nd, 2023 at 11:03am
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Jan 1st, 2023 at 3:45pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Jan 1st, 2023 at 3:38pm:
Quote:
Here, enslaved people were beneath even the human desire for freedom. They had to be diseased.

This thinking would thrive in the 18th and especially the 19th centuries. It would mutate, vary in perversion and persevere for 400 years right up to the present day. Starting with theories of physical and intellectual inferiority that likened blacks to animals — monkeys and apes especially — or helpless children, it would evolve to infer black cultural and then social inferiority.

“What black inferiority meant has changed in every generation . . . but ultimately Americans have been making the same case,” said historian Ibram X. Kendi.

Such thought exists today with pernicious assumptions about the current nature of black life and black people, still featuring age-old racist references to blacks as animals. It persists despite the advent of modern DNA science, which has shown race to be fundamentally a social construct. Humans, as it turns out, share about 99.9 percent of their DNA with each other, and outward physical characteristics such as hair texture and skin color, about which racists have long obsessed, occupy just a tiny portion of the human genome.

[Source]

Who persistly posts such bullshit about Indigenous Australians, continually, post after post?  Matty, Soren, Gnads. of course.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


Pretty old and worn-out nonsense that, Brian.


How, Graps? What exactly is "old" or "worn-out" about what I quoted?  Explain your statement, please!   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Gnads
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 29261
Gender: male
Re: The basis against Racism
Reply #12 - Jan 2nd, 2023 at 1:05pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Jan 1st, 2023 at 3:38pm:
Quote:
Here, enslaved people were beneath even the human desire for freedom. They had to be diseased.

This thinking would thrive in the 18th and especially the 19th centuries. It would mutate, vary in perversion and persevere for 400 years right up to the present day. Starting with theories of physical and intellectual inferiority that likened blacks to animals — monkeys and apes especially — or helpless children, it would evolve to infer black cultural and then social inferiority.

“What black inferiority meant has changed in every generation . . . but ultimately Americans have been making the same case,” said historian Ibram X. Kendi.

Such thought exists today with pernicious assumptions about the current nature of black life and black people, still featuring age-old racist references to blacks as animals. It persists despite the advent of modern DNA science, which has shown race to be fundamentally a social construct. Humans, as it turns out, share about 99.9 percent of their DNA with each other, and outward physical characteristics such as hair texture and skin color, about which racists have long obsessed, occupy just a tiny portion of the human genome.

[Source]

Who persistly posts such bullshit about Indigenous Australians, continually, post after post?  Matty, Soren, Gnads. of course.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


I do nothing of the sort you lying old tosspot.

What I have said is in response to stupid statements you make that "racial differences" is a social construct.

It has nothing to do with "white supremacy".

The 1% of difference is physical that can be differentiated with the eye.

What also puts peoples apart is ethnic tribalism, culture & customs as well.

Silly old SJW tsk tsk

Back to top
 

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 83705
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: The basis against Racism
Reply #13 - Jan 2nd, 2023 at 1:12pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Jan 2nd, 2023 at 11:03am:
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Jan 1st, 2023 at 3:45pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Jan 1st, 2023 at 3:38pm:
Quote:
Here, enslaved people were beneath even the human desire for freedom. They had to be diseased.

This thinking would thrive in the 18th and especially the 19th centuries. It would mutate, vary in perversion and persevere for 400 years right up to the present day. Starting with theories of physical and intellectual inferiority that likened blacks to animals — monkeys and apes especially — or helpless children, it would evolve to infer black cultural and then social inferiority.

“What black inferiority meant has changed in every generation . . . but ultimately Americans have been making the same case,” said historian Ibram X. Kendi.

Such thought exists today with pernicious assumptions about the current nature of black life and black people, still featuring age-old racist references to blacks as animals. It persists despite the advent of modern DNA science, which has shown race to be fundamentally a social construct. Humans, as it turns out, share about 99.9 percent of their DNA with each other, and outward physical characteristics such as hair texture and skin color, about which racists have long obsessed, occupy just a tiny portion of the human genome.

[Source]

Who persistly posts such bullshit about Indigenous Australians, continually, post after post?  Matty, Soren, Gnads. of course.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


Pretty old and worn-out nonsense that, Brian.


How, Graps? What exactly is "old" or "worn-out" about what I quoted?  Explain your statement, please!   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


18th and 19th century... the ridiculous approach of trying to lump any dissenting view into some 'worn-out' or 'phobic' category.... utter nonsense and you know it.  As for race being a social construct - there are clear differences and while social things may make a difference - this 'social construct' remains impermeable to deconstruction and reconstruction..... you can take the boy out of the Ay-rab tent, but you can never take the Ay-rab tent out of the boy (ouch!) .... hence the stealth war by socialist governments in their program to bring in all kinds from across the globe so we can intermix our genes with them and form that great big melting pot full of coffee coloured people by the score.**

Instead of the White Supremacist campaign of rooting the Black out of them - we now have the Dark Supremacist campaign to root the white out of us - and we are very active in that.... you can always rely on real men to root anything in sight that is female - thank god for the poofs and the trannies slowing the trend down so the destruction of the West is slower......

Grin  Grin  Grin  Cool  Cool  Cool   Tongue  Tongue  Tongue  Wink  Wink  Wink

** I note Albo is letting down the program with his Ultra-White missus ...... bloody hypocrite....   Grin  Grin  Grin  Grin  Grin
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 40817
Re: The basis against Racism
Reply #14 - Jan 2nd, 2023 at 1:34pm
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Jan 2nd, 2023 at 1:12pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Jan 2nd, 2023 at 11:03am:
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Jan 1st, 2023 at 3:45pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Jan 1st, 2023 at 3:38pm:
Quote:
Here, enslaved people were beneath even the human desire for freedom. They had to be diseased.

This thinking would thrive in the 18th and especially the 19th centuries. It would mutate, vary in perversion and persevere for 400 years right up to the present day. Starting with theories of physical and intellectual inferiority that likened blacks to animals — monkeys and apes especially — or helpless children, it would evolve to infer black cultural and then social inferiority.

“What black inferiority meant has changed in every generation . . . but ultimately Americans have been making the same case,” said historian Ibram X. Kendi.

Such thought exists today with pernicious assumptions about the current nature of black life and black people, still featuring age-old racist references to blacks as animals. It persists despite the advent of modern DNA science, which has shown race to be fundamentally a social construct. Humans, as it turns out, share about 99.9 percent of their DNA with each other, and outward physical characteristics such as hair texture and skin color, about which racists have long obsessed, occupy just a tiny portion of the human genome.

[Source]

Who persistly posts such bullshit about Indigenous Australians, continually, post after post?  Matty, Soren, Gnads. of course.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


Pretty old and worn-out nonsense that, Brian.


How, Graps? What exactly is "old" or "worn-out" about what I quoted?  Explain your statement, please!   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


18th and 19th century... the ridiculous approach of trying to lump any dissenting view into some 'worn-out' or 'phobic' category.... utter nonsense and you know it.  As for race being a social construct - there are clear differences and while social things may make a difference - this 'social construct' remains impermeable to deconstruction and reconstruction..... you can take the boy out of the Ay-rab tent, but you can never take the Ay-rab tent out of the boy (ouch!) .... hence the stealth war by socialist governments in their program to bring in all kinds from across the globe so we can intermix our genes with them and form that great big melting pot full of coffee coloured people by the score.**

Instead of the White Supremacist campaign of rooting the Black out of them - we now have the Dark Supremacist campaign to root the white out of us - and we are very active in that.... you can always rely on real men to root anything in sight that is female - thank god for the poofs and the trannies slowing the trend down so the destruction of the West is slower......

Grin  Grin  Grin  Cool  Cool  Cool   Tongue  Tongue  Tongue  Wink  Wink  Wink

** I note Albo is letting down the program with his Ultra-White missus ...... bloody hypocrite....   Grin  Grin  Grin  Grin  Grin


So, you're basically arguing against Genetics and it's revelations, are you, Graps?  Oh, dearie, dearie, me, what a silly position to take.  There is oodles of science about how Genetics works and how it is structured.  You are running a hard road if that is the approach you want to take?  The reality is, there are no major Genetic differences between an African, an Asian, a Caucasian, a Polynesian, an Amerindian or anybody else.  They are all, essentially, identical, Genetically.  The physical differences are a consequence of evolutionary adaptations to the local environment.  The political differences are a social construct, created (invariably) by man to describe himself superior to other men on the basis of skin colour/eye shape/thickness of physique/lips/frizziness of hair/etc.  Underneath all people are equal, all human.  Until you Racists embrace modern science and jettison your insane beliefs in "Race", you and the rest of humanity will be condemned to live in the 19th century.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 ... 9
Send Topic Print