Baronvonrort wrote on Jan 6
th, 2023 at 11:46pm:
If that's the best argument you have it's a piss poor effort when you can't even get the dates right.
Current data shows unvaxxed are doing far better than fully vaxxed which means 4 or more shots if you have your 6 month boosters.
Current data here how are you going to spin this?
https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1668373929/33#33 Yes, I made a typographical error. My bad.
So I'll ask the question again (with the corrected date) and ask you
to address the actual data, rather than focussing on something that
doesn't affect the accuracy of the comparable rates of death.
Quote:Less than 2% of people admitted to intensive care in NSW in the first
11 weeks of the September '21 outbreak were fully vaccinated.
Of the total admitted to hospital, 153 were vaccinated,
while 3,657 were unvaccinated.
I've presented this little data set before, here, and not one anti-vaxxer
has had the
cojones to address it. Why is that?
Well, it's because official figures don't lie, but we all know that anti-vaxxers
hate to be confronted with data that soundly demolishes their silly beliefs.
You also claim that "Current data shows
unvaxxed are doing far better than
fully vaxxed which means 4 or more shots if you have your 6 month boosters".
Nope. The figures in that table do not show that at all. Those figures are
raw numbers, not pro-rata. You obviously know very little about statistics.
And these are more current data: