Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 
Send Topic Print
The Push For Fees For Non-Union Members (Read 1356 times)
Gnads
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 29830
Gender: male
Re: The Push For Fees For Non-Union Members
Reply #30 - Jan 23rd, 2023 at 12:52pm
 
Jasin wrote on Jan 23rd, 2023 at 12:44pm:
So Gonads - do you think that Registered Nurses who just push a Medicine Trolley around in an Aged Care Facility of a boring General Ward should NOT be paid the same amount of money as RN's who work in Emergency and other busier departments?
Are those ACF and GW Nurses 'scabs' who get the same money as harder working Nurses?

Call me bludger, scab, etc all you like.
I'm not going to make my private life available to your exploitation. You must think I'm stupid? Roll Eyes
You get wrong'uns and googlies from me only.

The mere coercive manipulation of calling Workers as 'non'-union members shows the corrupt intentions of the Unions.
Workers are workers, they are not 'non'-member to anything else.
The only Scab in this country is the Unions as they wave their Yankee Eureka Flag and have stickers of Cop-Killer Terrorist Ned Kelly as their hero.


I don't have to think it .... you are.

That example is irrelevant .... who decides the definition of "harder" working?

It matters not - if you accept Union won wages & conditions and don't join a Union & contribute to what you enjoy off the back of Unions then you are a leaner & or a scab.
Back to top
 

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 49132
Gender: male
Re: The Push For Fees For Non-Union Members
Reply #31 - Jan 23rd, 2023 at 12:57pm
 
So General Ward and Aged Care Nurses are leaners and scabs off the backs of other Nurses who work in more demanding departments like Emergency, etc upon the same pay rate??

Come now Yankee Unionist - draw the f*ucking line!

The only difference between you and I Gonads is that you need the Union because you will 'always' be a Worker.
Grin
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 47261
Gender: male
Re: The Push For Fees For Non-Union Members
Reply #32 - Jan 23rd, 2023 at 1:05pm
 
Gnads wrote on Jan 23rd, 2023 at 12:37pm:
Frank wrote on Jan 23rd, 2023 at 11:10am:
The entitlements are granted by the employer, not the union.




Absolutely, positively, indubitably 100% incorrect.


I was a member of the NTEU for about two year. Every branch meeting was a little trip to Moscow circa 1930. They invariable pushed for more Marxist, woke positions, very often in areas that had nothing to do with employment.  Professors referred to themselves as the "workers".  Deadly and organically politicised in a Socialist International kind of way.

I am all for employees and employers negotiating and where it is done locally it is very good for both sideas. But when head office pressures local workers to take the union's or the ACTU's politicised line it can become protracted and bloody minded, leading to bad blood and stalemate. Unions operate like a cartel, something businesses would be rightly punished for.



Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Gnads
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 29830
Gender: male
Re: The Push For Fees For Non-Union Members
Reply #33 - Jan 23rd, 2023 at 1:13pm
 
Jasin wrote on Jan 23rd, 2023 at 12:57pm:
So General Ward and Aged Care Nurses are leaners and scabs off the backs of other Nurses who work in more demanding departments like Emergency, etc upon the same pay rate??

Come now Yankee Unionist - draw the f*ucking line!

The only difference between you and I Gonads is that you need the Union because you will 'always' be a Worker.
Grin


Stop repeating yourself .... you're the one making a differentiation between these Nurses. You drew the line idiot.

If they get the same pay it's because they do the same work .... who are you to judge who works harder?

If you take wages & conditions won by Unions & are not in a Union to contribute then you are a leaner & or scab. End of.
Back to top
 

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais
 
IP Logged
 
Gnads
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 29830
Gender: male
Re: The Push For Fees For Non-Union Members
Reply #34 - Jan 23rd, 2023 at 1:18pm
 
Frank wrote on Jan 23rd, 2023 at 1:05pm:
Gnads wrote on Jan 23rd, 2023 at 12:37pm:
Frank wrote on Jan 23rd, 2023 at 11:10am:
The entitlements are granted by the employer, not the union.




Absolutely, positively, indubitably 100% incorrect.


I was a member of the NTEU for about two year. Every branch meeting was a little trip to Moscow circa 1930. They invariable pushed for more Marxist, woke positions, very often in areas that had nothing to do with employment.  Professors referred to themselves as the "workers".  Deadly and organically politicised in a Socialist International kind of way.

I am all for employees and employers negotiating and where it is done locally it is very good for both sideas. But when head office pressures local workers to take the union's or the ACTU's politicised line it can become protracted and bloody minded, leading to bad blood and stalemate. Unions operate like a cartel, something businesses would be rightly punished for.





And employers don't operate like cartels?

Turn up to local EBA negotiations with an industrial officer & lawyer type & HR personnel to snowball the local floor rep & a couple of workers???  Grin

You know that businessmens/womens associations are in actual fact Unions?

Unions of Employers  Roll Eyes

Come on Frank.
Back to top
 

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais
 
IP Logged
 
Kat
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Socialism IS the answer.

Posts: 17709
Everywhere and no-where
Gender: female
Re: The Push For Fees For Non-Union Members
Reply #35 - Jan 23rd, 2023 at 1:36pm
 
Gnads wrote on Jan 23rd, 2023 at 12:38pm:
Jasin wrote on Jan 23rd, 2023 at 11:52am:
Push to have all Unionists offer up their wives, sisters and daughters to provide pussy towards Australian non-unionist workers and their endeavour to provide Australia with a self-sufficient population growth.



Idiot


Can't argue with that assessment, Gnads.
Back to top
 

...
 
IP Logged
 
AusGeoff
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Sage of Gippsland

Posts: 5999
Victoria
Gender: male
Re: The Push For Fees For Non-Union Members
Reply #36 - Jan 23rd, 2023 at 1:37pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23rd, 2023 at 12:19pm:
..You don't see annual leave, sick pay, meal breaks, superannuation, maternity leave, penalty rates, etc. as benefits?

I worked for 30 to 40 years on and off as a self-employed engineering
consultant working through contract agencies in Australia and the UK.

I was never a union member in all those years, and never received the
benefits you list here:

Annual leave, sick pay, meal breaks, superannuation, maternity leave,
penalty rates etc.


I also had to fund my own superannuation and income protection.

As far as my rates of pay were concerned, it was up to me to negotiate
directly with the companies I worked for, both at the start of my contract
and through the tenure of longer contracts, which sometimes extended for
24 or 36 months. 

As a self-employed contractor, the Association of Architects, Engineers,
Surveyors and Draughtsmen of Australia (AAESDA) would not accept
self-employed engineers as members;  only salaried or wages people.

So we were left to fight our own pay battles.

And all this is one of the reasons I'm against any additional public holidays
such as the Victorian grand final Friday holiday, King's Birthday, Labour (sic) Day ,
Melbourne Cup Day, Easter Monday, and all the public holidays "manufactured"
in lieu of those  falling on Saturdays or Sundays.

This year for example New Year's Day fell on a Sunday, so we make the
following Monday a gazetted public holiday.  This is itself is absurd, and
costs the average engineering contract worker (say) $500, while the
salaried engineer pockets that amount.    Is that fair?   Not really, when
you multiply that by the 13 public holidays in Victoria.  ($6,500 in total. Ouch!)

Another massive taxpayer savings could be made in a very simple manner.
State and Federal public servants should work on weekday public holidays,
or if not, then they would not be paid for public holidays.  This could save
potentially billions of dollars annually if the second option were taken.

And yes;  I believe Australia employs far too many public servants (sic)
at all three government levels, with far too many of those sitting in comfortable,
overpaid niches, and protected by aggressive, untouchable unions.

(But that's a topic for another thread.)


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49280
At my desk.
Re: The Push For Fees For Non-Union Members
Reply #37 - Jan 23rd, 2023 at 2:27pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23rd, 2023 at 12:19pm:
freediver wrote on Jan 23rd, 2023 at 12:10pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23rd, 2023 at 11:51am:
freediver wrote on Jan 23rd, 2023 at 11:30am:
All we need is for grappler to start calling them scabs, and we will have gone through the entire repertoire of union recruitment. Again.


No need for name calling, or forcing people to join a union, or forcing them to pay other fees.

Let's be civil.

The solution is simple: union members get union-won entitlements, and non-members don't.

Only Medibank Private members get Medibank Private benefits.  Yeah?

So, only union members should get union-won benefits.

I don't see how any reasonable person can be opposed to this simple, fair solution.



Sure. After all, most non-union members earn more anyway. The unions would have no trouble recruiting if they actually benefitted their members, rather than trying to claim credit for the sun coming up in the morning.


You don't see annual leave, sick pay, meal breaks, superannuation, maternity leave, penalty rates, etc. as benefits?



Sure I do. I also benefit from the sun coming up in the morning.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 138739
Gender: male
Re: The Push For Fees For Non-Union Members
Reply #38 - Jan 23rd, 2023 at 2:31pm
 
freediver wrote on Jan 23rd, 2023 at 2:27pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23rd, 2023 at 12:19pm:
freediver wrote on Jan 23rd, 2023 at 12:10pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23rd, 2023 at 11:51am:
freediver wrote on Jan 23rd, 2023 at 11:30am:
All we need is for grappler to start calling them scabs, and we will have gone through the entire repertoire of union recruitment. Again.


No need for name calling, or forcing people to join a union, or forcing them to pay other fees.

Let's be civil.

The solution is simple: union members get union-won entitlements, and non-members don't.

Only Medibank Private members get Medibank Private benefits.  Yeah?

So, only union members should get union-won benefits.

I don't see how any reasonable person can be opposed to this simple, fair solution.



Sure. After all, most non-union members earn more anyway. The unions would have no trouble recruiting if they actually benefitted their members, rather than trying to claim credit for the sun coming up in the morning.


You don't see annual leave, sick pay, meal breaks, superannuation, maternity leave, penalty rates, etc. as benefits?



Sure I do. I also benefit from the sun coming up in the morning.


It doesn't actually come up.

The Earth revolves and creates the illusion of the sun rising over the horizon.

The sun isn't moving at all.



Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Lisa Jones
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 39047
Sydney
Gender: female
Re: The Push For Fees For Non-Union Members
Reply #39 - Jan 23rd, 2023 at 2:53pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23rd, 2023 at 12:51pm:
Union members earn 32% more than non-members per week. Here’s why.

The data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics clearly shows that union membership equals higher pay, no matter which way you cut it. This is because of a combination of the benefits of union membership



I take issue with your link's information.

It's just not the case.

I have very close family members in the industries listed in your link and there IS no difference in pay if you're a union member or not. 

For those who may not know : irrespective of union membership ... workers in a particular industry are covered by the same award and are paid the same amount per hour and are subject to the same conditions as set out by that award et al.

No offence Greggary but that information is very misleading and deceptive. The union organisation in your link has taken stats out of context and has run with it.

I'll be back later....I need to send a few emails. 
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jan 23rd, 2023 at 3:04pm by Lisa Jones »  

If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free.

HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415)
 
IP Logged
 
Lisa Jones
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 39047
Sydney
Gender: female
Re: The Push For Fees For Non-Union Members
Reply #40 - Jan 23rd, 2023 at 3:02pm
 
One other thing ....there's a further problem with your link Greggary.

1. Look who presented that misleading and deceptive information.

2. Now look at who fact checked it.

That's right. The same idiots!

Ok I need to contact a few people about this. Many thanks for bringing it up though 👌
Back to top
 

If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free.

HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415)
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 138739
Gender: male
Re: The Push For Fees For Non-Union Members
Reply #41 - Jan 23rd, 2023 at 3:10pm
 
Lisa Jones wrote on Jan 23rd, 2023 at 2:53pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23rd, 2023 at 12:51pm:
Union members earn 32% more than non-members per week. Here’s why.

The data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics clearly shows that union membership equals higher pay, no matter which way you cut it. This is because of a combination of the benefits of union membership



I take issue with your link's information.

It's just not the case.



Take it up with these guys:

"Information sourced from: Australian Bureau of Statistics (August 2020) Characteristics of Employment, Australia, ABS Website".

"Source: The Australia Institute, FWC "
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Captain Caveman
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6211
Gender: male
Re: The Push For Fees For Non-Union Members
Reply #42 - Jan 23rd, 2023 at 3:19pm
 
Jasin wrote on Jan 23rd, 2023 at 12:26pm:
Captain Caveman wrote on Jan 23rd, 2023 at 12:02pm:
Jasin wrote on Jan 23rd, 2023 at 11:52am:
Push to have all Unionists offer up their wives, sisters and daughters to provide pussy towards Australian non-unionist workers and their endeavour to provide Australia with a self-sufficient population growth.




So you still want to scab off union members?

Like Unionists scabbing off Workers?



How?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 47261
Gender: male
Re: The Push For Fees For Non-Union Members
Reply #43 - Jan 23rd, 2023 at 3:22pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23rd, 2023 at 3:10pm:
Lisa Jones wrote on Jan 23rd, 2023 at 2:53pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23rd, 2023 at 12:51pm:
Union members earn 32% more than non-members per week. Here’s why.

The data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics clearly shows that union membership equals higher pay, no matter which way you cut it. This is because of a combination of the benefits of union membership



I take issue with your link's information.

It's just not the case.



Take it up with these guys:

"Information sourced from: Australian Bureau of Statistics (August 2020) Characteristics of Employment, Australia, ABS Website".

"Source: The Australia Institute, FWC "



As dishonest a statistic as you, tujdy substances.  Higher paid jobs are more unionised - education, health care, public service, construction - than less unionised occopations.

There is no salary gap WITHIN occupation becsuse of uninion membership.
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Captain Caveman
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6211
Gender: male
Re: The Push For Fees For Non-Union Members
Reply #44 - Jan 23rd, 2023 at 3:22pm
 
Jasin wrote on Jan 23rd, 2023 at 12:28pm:
Captain Caveman wrote on Jan 23rd, 2023 at 12:22pm:
freediver wrote on Jan 23rd, 2023 at 12:10pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23rd, 2023 at 11:51am:
freediver wrote on Jan 23rd, 2023 at 11:30am:
All we need is for grappler to start calling them scabs, and we will have gone through the entire repertoire of union recruitment. Again.


No need for name calling, or forcing people to join a union, or forcing them to pay other fees.

Let's be civil.

The solution is simple: union members get union-won entitlements, and non-members don't.

Only Medibank Private members get Medibank Private benefits.  Yeah?

So, only union members should get union-won benefits.

I don't see how any reasonable person can be opposed to this simple, fair solution.



Sure. After all, most non-union members earn more anyway. The unions would have no trouble recruiting if they actually benefitted their members, rather than trying to claim credit for the sun coming up in the morning.



Yeah, not in construction champ.

What? Sh*itty Commercial jobs that no tradie would want unless desperate for the work. Crap tradies do the commercial unionised jobs.



Are there EBA sites in residential?
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jan 23rd, 2023 at 3:34pm by Captain Caveman »  
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 
Send Topic Print