Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 
Send Topic Print
The Push For Fees For Non-Union Members (Read 1359 times)
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 47272
Gender: male
Re: The Push For Fees For Non-Union Members
Reply #45 - Jan 23rd, 2023 at 3:28pm
 
AusGeoff wrote on Jan 23rd, 2023 at 1:37pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23rd, 2023 at 12:19pm:
..You don't see annual leave, sick pay, meal breaks, superannuation, maternity leave, penalty rates, etc. as benefits?

I worked for 30 to 40 years on and off as a self-employed engineering
consultant working through contract agencies in Australia and the UK.

I was never a union member in all those years, and never received the
benefits you list here:

Annual leave, sick pay, meal breaks, superannuation, maternity leave,
penalty rates etc.


I also had to fund my own superannuation and income protection.

As far as my rates of pay were concerned, it was up to me to negotiate
directly with the companies I worked for, both at the start of my contract
and through the tenure of longer contracts, which sometimes extended for
24 or 36 months. 

As a self-employed contractor, the Association of Architects, Engineers,
Surveyors and Draughtsmen of Australia (AAESDA) would not accept
self-employed engineers as members;  only salaried or wages people.

So we were left to fight our own pay battles.

And all this is one of the reasons I'm against any additional public holidays
such as the Victorian grand final Friday holiday, King's Birthday, Labour (sic) Day ,
Melbourne Cup Day, Easter Monday, and all the public holidays "manufactured"
in lieu of those  falling on Saturdays or Sundays.

This year for example New Year's Day fell on a Sunday, so we make the
following Monday a gazetted public holiday.  This is itself is absurd, and
costs the average engineering contract worker (say) $500, while the
salaried engineer pockets that amount.    Is that fair?   Not really, when
you multiply that by the 13 public holidays in Victoria.  ($6,500 in total. Ouch!)

Another massive taxpayer savings could be made in a very simple manner.
State and Federal public servants should work on weekday public holidays,
or if not, then they would not be paid for public holidays.  This could save
potentially billions of dollars annually if the second option were taken.

And yes;  I believe Australia employs far too many public servants (sic)
at all three government levels, with far too many of those sitting in comfortable,
overpaid niches, and protected by aggressive, untouchable unions.

(But that's a topic for another thread.)



Well, if you were doing it for 30-40 years and didn't factor in holidays, week-ends, rainy days etc when doing your costings then you have noone but yourself to blame.   Savvy businesses would factor all those things in when negotiating their pay rates and employment conditions.

Also, doing it for decades tells me you were on a better overall pay than if you had sought employment by a company as a salaried engineer. Why else doi it as a freelancer otherwise?





Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 49141
Gender: male
Re: The Push For Fees For Non-Union Members
Reply #46 - Jan 23rd, 2023 at 4:04pm
 
Gnads wrote on Jan 23rd, 2023 at 1:13pm:
Jasin wrote on Jan 23rd, 2023 at 12:57pm:
So General Ward and Aged Care Nurses are leaners and scabs off the backs of other Nurses who work in more demanding departments like Emergency, etc upon the same pay rate??

Come now Yankee Unionist - draw the f*ucking line!

The only difference between you and I Gonads is that you need the Union because you will 'always' be a Worker.
Grin


Stop repeating yourself .... you're the one making a differentiation between these Nurses. You drew the line idiot.

If they get the same pay it's because they do the same work .... who are you to judge who works harder?

If you take wages & conditions won by Unions & are not in a Union to contribute then you are a leaner & or scab. End of.

Hey Numpty.
It's the Nurses who complain.
The ones who 'work harder', but watch other's work less and get paid the same.
You started it - now f*ucking finish it.
This is what it's like in your can of worms.

In many countries - there is 'paid by performance' rewards.
In other countries - the 'Workers' own the Business and hire the management and admin. Even though the illusion of 'workers only being blue collar' is as primitive as a Lemur's dna connection. White Collars are also 'process workers' with the brain having to work through the processes also.

You're a Unionised numpty who deserves to be a Worker all his life. Suck sh*it to you loser!  Grin
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 49141
Gender: male
Re: The Push For Fees For Non-Union Members
Reply #47 - Jan 23rd, 2023 at 4:09pm
 
Kat wrote on Jan 23rd, 2023 at 1:36pm:
Gnads wrote on Jan 23rd, 2023 at 12:38pm:
Jasin wrote on Jan 23rd, 2023 at 11:52am:
Push to have all Unionists offer up their wives, sisters and daughters to provide pussy towards Australian non-unionist workers and their endeavour to provide Australia with a self-sufficient population growth.



Idiot


Can't argue with that assessment, Gnads.


Can we neuter you Kat? Just to be sure.  Wink Don't want any feral breeding without official registration now.  Wink

...oh, maybe you would like to become a 'non-sexual'?
You know, why say no to men and yes to women -  when you can say no to sex altogether?
C'mon - talk it up like yeah  Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 49141
Gender: male
Re: The Push For Fees For Non-Union Members
Reply #48 - Jan 23rd, 2023 at 4:15pm
 
Push for all Australians to become the 51st State (Republic) of the USA once the British Union Jack and all things British are gone.

Yep people - pay your 51st State fees. Can't have you scabbing off America now.
Wink
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Lisa Jones
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 39047
Sydney
Gender: female
Re: The Push For Fees For Non-Union Members
Reply #49 - Jan 23rd, 2023 at 6:10pm
 
Gnads wrote on Jan 23rd, 2023 at 12:34pm:
Lisa Jones wrote on Jan 23rd, 2023 at 8:40am:
Gnads wrote on Jan 23rd, 2023 at 8:04am:
That would upset all the non contributing leaning scabs that now infest the workplace.....

they take the money, the conditions & benefits and never batt an eyelid of guilt

the lowest of the lowest common denominators.



https://amp.smh.com.au/politics/federal/top-state-unionists-push-actu-on-fees-fo...

Gnads - I'm not happy with you this morning.

What you're REALLY saying is this : If I can't do my job in recruiting more members (mind you I myself command an obscene salary) I should be protected by law so I can go about punishing those who refuse to become members to the tune of $550 per annum???

You do realise that Keating, Rudd and Gillard thought this wasn't right.

So why do YOU think it is?

Especially NOW .... right off the back of an unresolved global pandemic driven recession with rising inflation and rising interest rates?




Grin Like I actually give a rats arse.... seriously?

When I first entered the Railways in 1973 I joined the relevant Union after I was shown exactly what Unionism had bought to the workplace for the benefit of all employees.

Any fair minded person could see the reasoning there.

At that time anyone who chose not to, objected to & refused to join a Union relevant to their classification (there were many classifications in a railway) would have an equivalent amount of money to their applicable Union dues deducted from their pay every fortnight by the Employer to be given to a nominated charity.

It was a good idea & a fair result for all. Even the employer realised that.

It only changed when slimey Johnny Howard got into the seat in 1996.

Opened the door to all the leaners & scabs who are prepared to take & not contribute - Jasins testament to that.

The same sort of people that come running looking for Union assistance when they think they have been wronged by their employer.

8 hr day, 5 day week - now a 38 hr week, annual leave, sick leave, maternity leave, compassionate leave, cultural leave, meal breaks,workplace health & safety, superannuation, workplace amenities, reasonable hours of work etc. etc.

All part of what Unions have won for their members & not one bit of that was ever given freely out of the goodness of their hearts to workers by employers.

Regarding your 1st paragraph .... don't tell me you're a Union Rep? None that I know are on or commanding obscene salaries.

$550 per annum = $21.15 per fortnight.

The Union dues as Locomotive Driver of my former Union the RTBU is
$29.40 per fortnight = $764.40 per annum.

Other Unions & occupations there covered have much higher dues.

So $550 is a more than reasonable contribution.

Otherwise those who chose not to should forgo any of the above mentioned workplace wages & conditions negotiated & won by Unions.



Thank you Grandpa Gnads for that anecdote (which clearly belongs in the realms of ancient history).

If you don't mind could we please fast forward to 2023?

Unions are not just passé....they are notoriously disregarded as institutions which focus on scamming, scabbing and rorting the honest worker.

And that's why union membership in Australia is more IRRELEVANT than ever. 👇


Back to top
 

If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free.

HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415)
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Deep State Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 85043
Always was always will be HOME
Gender: male
Re: The Push For Fees For Non-Union Members
Reply #50 - Jan 23rd, 2023 at 6:16pm
 
Nothing but a pack of scabs leeching off the worker in the Union paying the way for wage cases and fights over conditions....
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 49141
Gender: male
Re: The Push For Fees For Non-Union Members
Reply #51 - Jan 23rd, 2023 at 6:22pm
 
Yeah - nick off back to America with your Unionism.
Poor American Workers are neglected and having to work for a measly few dollars and beg for tips.

Australian Workers are over-paid. Australian Workers are one of the highest paid Workforces in the world.
Besides the high cost of living in this country.
The lack of Industry and other Businesses setting up shop here in this country is very apparent.

I've worked along side many a 'union member' and I've never seen an blatant apparent 'magical aura' of them being better than other workers. Most a piss-heads and druggos all trying to sponge more money with a strike or two a year. Most are 'Compo' rorters - coming in with injuries from whatever on the weekend to rig something up to make it appear like it happened at work.
Most famous was with the Wharfies and other major industries where the workers always had an extra bundy card to cover the cost of the beer slabs.

The Union is nothing more than a corrupt Mafia-like entity - that no-one wants in this country anymore.

Go help those poor American Workers.
What? You can only manage a few dollars for them?
You Unions must be really crap! Roll Eyes
...you're only here to feed your own Union pockets.
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Lisa Jones
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 39047
Sydney
Gender: female
Re: The Push For Fees For Non-Union Members
Reply #52 - Jan 23rd, 2023 at 6:33pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23rd, 2023 at 3:10pm:
Lisa Jones wrote on Jan 23rd, 2023 at 2:53pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23rd, 2023 at 12:51pm:
Union members earn 32% more than non-members per week. Here’s why.

The data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics clearly shows that union membership equals higher pay, no matter which way you cut it. This is because of a combination of the benefits of union membership



I take issue with your link's information.

It's just not the case.



Take it up with these guys:

"Information sourced from: Australian Bureau of Statistics (August 2020) Characteristics of Employment, Australia, ABS Website".

"Source: The Australia Institute, FWC "


https://www.australianunions.org.au/2021/12/07/union-members-earn-32-more-than-n...

Greg you might need to take a closer look at what your link is stating then go to the ABS and see what that source is stating.

While you do that I'll quietly inform everyone else that actual mistakes wrt figures exist just by comparing both sources. Against each other.

The other spot of bother is this : the sample size which the ABS are NOW using in order to produce their results. They sample 26 000 dwellings across Australia. That's right....ONLY 26 thousand homes. This affects the reliability of estimates provided (and is referred to as sampling error - essentially too small a sample is surveyed).

In addition to that 👆..... there's this other spot of bother 👇:

"Since the April 2020 release, and given the extent of change in Labour Force time series due to COVID-19, the ABS has temporarily suspended trend series and moved to using forward factors for seasonal adjustment."

😐

Back to top
« Last Edit: Jan 23rd, 2023 at 6:45pm by Lisa Jones »  

If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free.

HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415)
 
IP Logged
 
Lisa Jones
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 39047
Sydney
Gender: female
Re: The Push For Fees For Non-Union Members
Reply #53 - Jan 23rd, 2023 at 6:43pm
 
Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Jan 23rd, 2023 at 6:16pm:
Nothing but a pack of scabs leeching off the worker in the Union paying the way for wage cases and fights over conditions....


Grandpa - that WAS the case wayyyyyyyt back in the 70's.

Not now. Ok?

The grubs of today ARE the unions! Their officials are earning top dollar while those workers they represent don't. The workers on the front lines are paying dues to fund the pay rises of those fat cats employed within the union movement.

The union movement is an institutional hierarchy that's politically aligned to Labor. Take a look at Bob Hawke and Bill Shorten for a clue. Those 2 political figures represent the period from the 1980's right through to the present. Whatever you knew of the union movement wayyyyy back in the day .... is gone. Fact!
Back to top
 

If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free.

HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415)
 
IP Logged
 
Jovial Monk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Dogs not cats!

Posts: 47794
Gender: male
Re: The Push For Fees For Non-Union Members
Reply #54 - Jan 23rd, 2023 at 6:43pm
 
26,000 is not a small sample.
Back to top
 

Get the vaxx! 💉💉

If you don’t like abortions ignore them like you do school shootings.
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 138740
Gender: male
Re: The Push For Fees For Non-Union Members
Reply #55 - Jan 23rd, 2023 at 6:52pm
 
Jovial Monk wrote on Jan 23rd, 2023 at 6:43pm:
26,000 is not a small sample.


Not by a long shot.

That's an excellent sample size for Australian households.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 74939
Gender: male
Re: The Push For Fees For Non-Union Members
Reply #56 - Jan 23rd, 2023 at 8:27pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23rd, 2023 at 12:19pm:
freediver wrote on Jan 23rd, 2023 at 12:10pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23rd, 2023 at 11:51am:
freediver wrote on Jan 23rd, 2023 at 11:30am:
All we need is for grappler to start calling them scabs, and we will have gone through the entire repertoire of union recruitment. Again.


No need for name calling, or forcing people to join a union, or forcing them to pay other fees.

Let's be civil.

The solution is simple: union members get union-won entitlements, and non-members don't.

Only Medibank Private members get Medibank Private benefits.  Yeah?

So, only union members should get union-won benefits.

I don't see how any reasonable person can be opposed to this simple, fair solution.



Sure. After all, most non-union members earn more anyway. The unions would have no trouble recruiting if they actually benefitted their members, rather than trying to claim credit for the sun coming up in the morning.


You don't see annual leave, sick pay, meal breaks, superannuation, maternity leave, penalty rates, etc. as benefits?



No, he's entitled to them  Cheesy
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Deep State Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 85043
Always was always will be HOME
Gender: male
Re: The Push For Fees For Non-Union Members
Reply #57 - Jan 23rd, 2023 at 8:40pm
 
Fee 'em all - let God sort 'em out ..... scabs .......

Most non-union members earn more -  LMFAO .... only because the Union guarantees the claims by putting their cash and sometimes their own livelihoods on the line to ensure those are kept.  Companies that fight Unions go down more often than those that don't.

Let's put that idea into play and see how long it takes to settle out..... only Union paid-up members get the benefits of Union negotiation.
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 58927
Here
Gender: male
Re: The Push For Fees For Non-Union Members
Reply #58 - Jan 23rd, 2023 at 8:43pm
 
The decline of union membership has been mirrored in the application of Industrial relations legislation from the right predominantly but the left have not been a lot better.

Business the business unions and the Liberal party have been successful in finding ways to neuter the unions.

The clear result has been decades of wage and condition stagnation. There is no case to argue otherwise.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Deep State Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 85043
Always was always will be HOME
Gender: male
Re: The Push For Fees For Non-Union Members
Reply #59 - Jan 23rd, 2023 at 9:14pm
 
Dnarever wrote on Jan 23rd, 2023 at 8:43pm:
The decline of union membership has been mirrored in the application of Industrial relations legislation from the right predominantly but the left have not been a lot better.

Business the business unions and the Liberal party have been successful in finding ways to neuter the unions.

The clear result has been decades of wage and condition stagnation. There is no case to argue otherwise.


That's the aim - reduce the peasants who do the toil to third world status of beggars while promoting their betters to billions beyond their wildest dreams... just like in China... if the Chinese New Emperor can build a family worth of hundreds of billions - why can't they, goes the reasoning.... it's only right and just...
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 
Send Topic Print