I was pleased to read this report. At the time, I couldn't accept
the the US judicial system had effectively let Rittenhouse get away
with murdering two people in cold blood.
I can only hope that John Huber's claim is successful, and if so, that
its financial loading on Rittenhouse will shut him down permanently
and ruin his life hereon.
This sad little crybaby grub should by rights be now residing in the
big house—where I'm sure a few of the boys would've by now carried
out a little shirt lifting—to
really bring on some genuine tears.
At the very least, Rittenhouse should've been convicted of two charges
of involuntary manslaughter.
In Australia, that charge requires the prosecution to prove that the
accused had caused the death of a person(s)
during an unlawful
and dangerous act, as was noted by the Australian High Court
in Wilson v. The Queen in 1992.
In Rittenhouse's case, it was obvious—even to blind Freddy—that he acted
in "an unlawful and dangerous manner".
(Is the involuntary manslaughter charge the same/similar in America?)