Belgarion wrote on Feb 5
th, 2023 at 5:37pm:
Sounds reasonable enough on the face of it, but then I read this bit: "One of the real key indicators of the likelihood of a woman or family suffering violence [or] being killed in a domestic violence situation is the presence of a firearm in the house," The implication being that firearms owners are more likely to be wife bashers than others, and the involvement of some 'Womens Safety and Wellbeing' organisation smacks of an agenda rather than a well intentioned safeguard.
Nope. Wrong on all counts.
The legislation in no way "implies" that gun owners are more
likely to be "wife bashers". To make that claim, you need to
cite references supporting it.
Links please.
And of course all affected groups—such as women's safety
organisations—need to be involved. You're seeing an "agenda"
where there is none. Why specifically do you disagree with
women's support and wellbeing groups being included? You
seem to think it's okay for all the legislation to be determined
by men, but not by women? Isn't that sexist?