Dnarever wrote on Mar 11
th, 2023 at 8:25am:
Black Orchid wrote on Mar 11
th, 2023 at 8:12am:
Dnarever wrote on Mar 11
th, 2023 at 8:03am:
You should be embarrassed.
Tuckers lies can be safely ignored and should be.
So actual footage that was intentionally withheld by the FBI and DOJ is "Tucker's lies" in your mind?
You're the one who should be embarrassed or, more specifically, sectioned.
Quote:So actual footage that was intentionally withheld by the FBI and DOJ
If you have 40 hours of film of someone who is going to commit a crime do you show the clip of him going to the rest room at 10:30 or the clip of him robbing the bank at 11:30 ?
Tuckems is showing the rest room visit. See all is OK - He is innocent.
Is that how it is meant to work?
The majority of the crowd were peaceful and just wandered around, mostly being guided by the police. Those idiots that were violent deserve to be punished.
Jacob Chansley, for instance, was NOT violent but your mob made an example of him to push your agenda. He was guided through the chamber by police who opened doors for him and escorted him around. The worst he did was say a prayer on the Senate floor. Yet he was sentenced to over 4 years in solitary confinement. The footage was withheld from his lawyer even though he repeatedly made the requisite filings for it.
He's wandering around chatting happily to up to 9 cops who found him to be NO threat.
Should ALL the footage be shown or just what you lot cherry pick for your agenda.
Then we have Brian Sicknick who your lot keep disingenuously parroting was beaten to death with a fire extinguisher. Yet he's happily wandering around chatting and picking up rubbish hours after the event.
You said you have not seen even the footage yet you still parrot lies and cast judgment. Is this how you think justice should work?
At least try to show some integrity.
Great post. 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼