Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
little pinks: war = consensus (Read 490 times)
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Online


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49030
At my desk.
little pinks: war = consensus
Mar 16th, 2023 at 7:38am
 
thegreatdivide wrote on Mar 15th, 2023 at 9:32pm:
freediver wrote on Mar 15th, 2023 at 9:04pm:
Quote:
How about the possibility of  benevolent, meritocratic  authority,  achieved by consensus instead?


Achieved how?


Well....in China the matter was settled by a civil war; interestingly, the population now register 90% support for the CCP government (according to a recent Harvard poll).


After slaughtering their way across the country and gaining power, the CCP slaughtered wealthy traders, farmers etc. Because, being communist, they knew better how to grow and distribute food, and rich people were the natural enemy, like Jews are to the Nazis and Muslims. They then starved 50 million Chinese people to death in their efforts to distribute food equally.

Apparently, killing people in the millions until they stop criticising you is how you build consensus.

The CCP learnt a valuable lesson from this - how to lie to Chinese people and get away with it. Throughout the Great Chinese famine, the CCP pumped out propaganda about how destitute the Americans and other western nations were, and how much more prosperous the Chinese are. The Chinese people were fed a steady diet of locusts and hot air. To this day, the CCP still pumps out almost identical propaganda. It makes the little pinks come across as deranged lunatics.

Are the Chinese people stupid enough to believe it?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
issuevoter
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 9200
The Great State of Mind
Gender: male
Re: little pinks: war = consensus
Reply #1 - Mar 16th, 2023 at 8:29am
 
Communism, which is socialism perfected, always requires a military/police state dictatorship to maintain the power structure, because the people cannot be trusted to vote the right way. This has been the case in the USSR, Warsaw Pact, China, N Korea, Cuba, Cambodia, Vietnam, Yugoslavia, and the puny attempts elsewhere like South America, and soon to be, the Myanmar Peoples Republic. And Leftests in Australia sympathise.
Back to top
 

No political allegiance. No philosophy. No religion.
 
IP Logged
 
Lisa Jones
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 39047
Sydney
Gender: female
Re: little pinks: war = consensus
Reply #2 - Mar 16th, 2023 at 9:17am
 
freediver wrote on Mar 16th, 2023 at 7:38am:
thegreatdivide wrote on Mar 15th, 2023 at 9:32pm:
freediver wrote on Mar 15th, 2023 at 9:04pm:
Quote:
How about the possibility of  benevolent, meritocratic  authority,  achieved by consensus instead?


Achieved how?


Well....in China the matter was settled by a civil war; interestingly, the population now register 90% support for the CCP government (according to a recent Harvard poll).


After slaughtering their way across the country and gaining power, the CCP slaughtered wealthy traders, farmers etc. Because, being communist, they knew better how to grow and distribute food, and rich people were the natural enemy, like Jews are to the Nazis and Muslims. They then starved 50 million Chinese people to death in their efforts to distribute food equally.

Apparently, killing people in the millions until they stop criticising you is how you build consensus.

The CCP learnt a valuable lesson from this - how to lie to Chinese people and get away with it. Throughout the Great Chinese famine, the CCP pumped out propaganda about how destitute the Americans and other western nations were, and how much more prosperous the Chinese are. The Chinese people were fed a steady diet of locusts and hot air. To this day, the CCP still pumps out almost identical propaganda. It makes the little pinks come across as deranged lunatics.

Are the Chinese people stupid enough to believe it?


Freediver....you should have asked the NotsoGreat tosspot for the link to that unsubstantiated claim.

Trust me....it will be worth it.
Back to top
 

If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free.

HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415)
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12940
Gender: male
Re: little pinks: war = consensus
Reply #3 - Mar 16th, 2023 at 12:06pm
 
Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 16th, 2023 at 9:17am:
freediver wrote on Mar 16th, 2023 at 7:38am:
thegreatdivide wrote on Mar 15th, 2023 at 9:32pm:
freediver wrote on Mar 15th, 2023 at 9:04pm:
[quote]How about the possibility of  benevolent, meritocratic  authority,  achieved by consensus instead?


Achieved how?


Well....in China the matter was settled by a civil war; interestingly, the population now register 90% support for the CCP government (according to a recent Harvard poll).


After slaughtering their way across the country and gaining power, the CCP slaughtered wealthy traders, farmers etc. Because, being communist, they knew better how to grow and distribute food, and rich people were the natural enemy, like Jews are to the Nazis and Muslims. They then starved 50 million Chinese people to death in their efforts to distribute food equally.


Er.... how about a more balanced view of history?

Marx observed the ruination of children forced to work in underground coal mines when the Industrial Revolution was gaining steam (excuse the pun) ...and he thought about it for a while, and suggested some solutions....

Quote:
Apparently, killing people in the millions until they stop criticising you is how you build consensus.


Well, workers' protests against the outrages of the Industrial Revolution didn't change anything during their lifetimes; millions died in wars and entrenched poverty. 

Quote:
The CCP learnt a valuable lesson from this - how to lie to Chinese people and get away with it. Throughout the Great Chinese famine, the CCP pumped out propaganda about how destitute the Americans and other western nations were, and how much more prosperous the Chinese are. The Chinese people were fed a steady diet of locusts and hot air. To this day, the CCP still pumps out almost identical propaganda. It makes the little pinks come across as deranged lunatics.

Are the Chinese people stupid enough to believe it?


After observing  the storming of  the US capitol, Chinese people are more confident in their system than ever.

Quote:
Freediver....you should have asked the NotsoGreat tosspot for the link to that unsubstantiated claim.

Trust me....it will be worth it.


What claim is that? That Marx is considered to be one of the greatest thinkers of all time?

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/marx/

"Karl Marx (1818–1883) is often treated as a revolutionary, an activist rather than a philosopher, whose works inspired the foundation of many communist regimes in the twentieth century. It is certainly hard to find many thinkers who can be said to have had comparable influence in the creation of the modern world. However, Marx was trained as a philosopher, and although often portrayed as moving away from philosophy in his mid-twenties—perhaps towards history and the social sciences—there are many points of contact with modern philosophical debates throughout his writings.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12940
Gender: male
Re: little pinks: war = consensus
Reply #4 - Mar 16th, 2023 at 12:22pm
 
Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 16th, 2023 at 9:17am:
freediver wrote on Mar 16th, 2023 at 7:38am:
thegreatdivide wrote on Mar 15th, 2023 at 9:32pm:
freediver wrote on Mar 15th, 2023 at 9:04pm:
[quote]How about the possibility of  benevolent, meritocratic  authority,  achieved by consensus instead?


Achieved how?


Well....in China the matter was settled by a civil war; interestingly, the population now register 90% support for the CCP government (according to a recent Harvard poll).


After slaughtering their way across the country and gaining power, the CCP slaughtered wealthy traders, farmers etc. Because, being communist, they knew better how to grow and distribute food, and rich people were the natural enemy, like Jews are to the Nazis and Muslims. They then starved 50 million Chinese people to death in their efforts to distribute food equally.


Er.... how about a more balanced view of history?

Marx observed the ruination of children forced to work in underground coal mines when the Industrial Revolution was gaining steam (excuse the pun) ...and he thought about it for a while, and suggested some solutions....

Quote:
Apparently, killing people in the millions until they stop criticising you is how you build consensus.


Well, workers' protests against the outrages of the Industrial Revolution didn't change anything during their lifetimes; millions died in wars among capitalist countries,  and endured entrenched poverty. 

Quote:
The CCP learnt a valuable lesson from this - how to lie to Chinese people and get away with it. Throughout the Great Chinese famine, the CCP pumped out propaganda about how destitute the Americans and other western nations were, and how much more prosperous the Chinese are. The Chinese people were fed a steady diet of locusts and hot air. To this day, the CCP still pumps out almost identical propaganda. It makes the little pinks come across as deranged lunatics.

Are the Chinese people stupid enough to believe it?


After observing  the storming of  the US capitol, Chinese people are more confident in their system than ever.

Quote:
Freediver....you should have asked the NotsoGreat tosspot for the link to that unsubstantiated claim.

Trust me....it will be worth it.


What claim is that? That Marx is considered to be one of the greatest thinkers of all time?

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/marx/

"Karl Marx (1818–1883) is often treated as a revolutionary, an activist rather than a philosopher, whose works inspired the foundation of many communist regimes in the twentieth century. It is certainly hard to find many thinkers who can be said to have had comparable influence in the creation of the modern world. However, Marx was trained as a philosopher, and although often portrayed as moving away from philosophy in his mid-twenties—perhaps towards history and the social sciences—there are many points of contact with modern philosophical debates throughout his writings.

edit: oh... the claim Chinese are satisfied with the CCP government; here:

https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2020/07/long-term-survey-reveals-chinese-...

Ash Center Communications

DATE: July 9, 2020

Understanding what Chinese citizens think about their own government has proven elusive to scholars, policymakers, and businesspeople alike outside of the country. Opinion polling in China is heavily scrutinized by the government, with foreign polling firms prohibited from directly conducting surveys.

Given China’s global rise in the economic, military, and diplomatic spheres, understanding public opinion there has arguably never been more important.

A new study from the Ash Center fills in this gap for the first time, providing a long-term view of how Chinese citizens view their government at the national, as well as the regional and local levels. What started as an exercise in building a set of teaching tools for an executive education class eventually transformed into the longest academic survey of Chinese public opinion conducted by a research institution outside of China.

“Gathering reliable, long-term opinion survey data from across the country is a real obstacle,” said Ash Center China Programs Director Edward Cunningham. “Rigorous and objective opinion polling is something that we take for granted in the U.S.”

While important work in this area has been accomplished by previous scholars — and their work shaped the analysis of the survey data collected — those other surveys were often short-term or infrequent.
[b]
The survey team found that compared to public opinion patterns in the U.S., in China there was very high satisfaction with the central government. In 2016, the last year the survey was conducted, 95.5 percent of respondents were either “relatively satisfied” or “highly satisfied” with Beijing. In contrast to these findings, Gallup reported in January of this year that their latest polling on U.S. citizen satisfaction with the American federal government revealed only 38 percent of respondents were satisfied with the federal government. 


Like I said, since then we have seen US deplorables storming the US Capitol.


Back to top
« Last Edit: Mar 16th, 2023 at 12:28pm by thegreatdivide »  
 
IP Logged
 
Lisa Jones
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 39047
Sydney
Gender: female
Re: little pinks: war = consensus
Reply #5 - Mar 16th, 2023 at 12:59pm
 
freediver wrote on Mar 16th, 2023 at 7:38am:
thegreatdivide wrote on Mar 15th, 2023 at 9:32pm:
freediver wrote on Mar 15th, 2023 at 9:04pm:
Quote:
How about the possibility of  benevolent, meritocratic  authority,  achieved by consensus instead?


Achieved how?


Well....in China the matter was settled by a civil war; interestingly, the population now register 90% support for the CCP government (according to a recent Harvard poll).


After slaughtering their way across the country and gaining power, the CCP slaughtered wealthy traders, farmers etc. Because, being communist, they knew better how to grow and distribute food, and rich people were the natural enemy, like Jews are to the Nazis and Muslims. They then starved 50 million Chinese people to death in their efforts to distribute food equally.

Apparently, killing people in the millions until they stop criticising you is how you build consensus.

The CCP learnt a valuable lesson from this - how to lie to Chinese people and get away with it. Throughout the Great Chinese famine, the CCP pumped out propaganda about how destitute the Americans and other western nations were, and how much more prosperous the Chinese are. The Chinese people were fed a steady diet of locusts and hot air. To this day, the CCP still pumps out almost identical propaganda. It makes the little pinks come across as deranged lunatics.

Are the Chinese people stupid enough to believe it?


No they’re just not allowed to say anything against the regime esp if they value their life and the life of their family.
Back to top
 

If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free.

HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415)
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12940
Gender: male
Re: little pinks: war = consensus
Reply #6 - Mar 16th, 2023 at 1:37pm
 
freediver wrote on Mar 16th, 2023 at 7:38am:
.....etc  etc...


Notice how FD, in his inimitable fraudulent manner, opens a thread entitled:


"Re: little pinks: war = consensus".

All because he lost the argument that 2-way communication between community agents and the local governing council is a form of grass-roots democracy in action.

FD, up there with Lisa for slippery, fraudulent (when not  just plain dumb) ideology. 

Back to top
« Last Edit: Mar 16th, 2023 at 1:44pm by thegreatdivide »  
 
IP Logged
 
Gordon
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20597
Gordon
Gender: male
Re: little pinks: war = consensus
Reply #7 - Mar 16th, 2023 at 2:23pm
 
issuevoter wrote on Mar 16th, 2023 at 8:29am:
Communism, which is socialism perfected, always requires a military/police state dictatorship to maintain the power structure, because the people cannot be trusted to vote the right way. This has been the case in the USSR, Warsaw Pact, China, N Korea, Cuba, Cambodia, Vietnam, Yugoslavia, and the puny attempts elsewhere like South America, and soon to be, the Myanmar Peoples Republic. And Leftests in Australia sympathise.


Check out this board member.

Pro child mutilation, supports images about child grooming AND thinks socialism IS THE ANSWER.
Back to top
 

IBI
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12940
Gender: male
Re: little pinks: war = consensus
Reply #8 - Mar 16th, 2023 at 5:06pm
 
issuevoter wrote on Mar 16th, 2023 at 8:29am:
Communism, which is socialism perfected, always requires a military/police state dictatorship to maintain the power structure, because the people cannot be trusted to vote the right way.


Of course; we are all instinctively greedy, some of us - especially the RW - blindly so.

That's why the history of the world has been a sorry tale of endless wars, class warfare, and entrenched poverty amidst vast wealth, as governments have failed to harness that greed for the common welfare.

That's where socialism - as theorized by Marx and others - comes in: managing the submission of individual greed, to achieve  the common welfare, via rule of law rather than the chaos of adversarial elections.   

Quote:
  This has been the case in the USSR, Warsaw Pact, China, N Korea, Cuba, Cambodia, Vietnam, Yugoslavia, and the puny attempts elsewhere like South America, and soon to be, the Myanmar Peoples Republic. And Leftests in Australia sympathise.


Indeed, achieving orderly, constructive, political and economic relations on this planet is difficult, given the power of individual instinct which chafes at rule of law.

But men have the capacity to think (cortex brain), as well as being driven by prehistoric instincts still present in the reptilian brain (basal ganglia).

So it's reasonable to be optimistic we can still save ourselves from the  madness of a nuclear arms race  amid ongoing endless wars, while discovering how to eradicate poverty and disadvantage from the face of our beautiful planet.  
Back to top
« Last Edit: Mar 16th, 2023 at 5:28pm by thegreatdivide »  
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 48347
Gender: male
Re: little pinks: war = consensus
Reply #9 - Mar 16th, 2023 at 5:32pm
 
Gordon wrote on Mar 16th, 2023 at 2:23pm:
issuevoter wrote on Mar 16th, 2023 at 8:29am:
Communism, which is socialism perfected, always requires a military/police state dictatorship to maintain the power structure, because the people cannot be trusted to vote the right way. This has been the case in the USSR, Warsaw Pact, China, N Korea, Cuba, Cambodia, Vietnam, Yugoslavia, and the puny attempts elsewhere like South America, and soon to be, the Myanmar Peoples Republic. And Leftests in Australia sympathise.


Check out this board member.

Pro child mutilation, supports images about child grooming AND thinks socialism IS THE ANSWER.


As a Celibate of the Brotherhood of the Whistling Wood.
Our 'loophole' is that we are only allowed to have sex with Lesbians. I'ld wroot her!
...I still can't get my head around the loophole though? Undecided Huh
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print