Australian Politics Forum - He Applied For 472 Rental Properties

Setanta

Gold Member

Offline

\/ Peace man!

Posts: 16616
Northern NSW
Gender: male

Re: He Applied For 472 Rental Properties
Reply #30 - Mar 17^th, 2023 at 7:51pm

mothra wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 7:38pm:

Setanta wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 7:27pm:

mothra wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 7:16pm:

Setanta wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 7:12pm:

As you say, there is a housing crisis, why would someone give up guaranteed 25% of their income rent to go private, especially if they have pets?

He didn't.

"Whereas just five years ago when I was in social housing, it was capped at 25 per cent," he said.

Tell us how you know he didn't give it up and if he didn't give it up then he was tossed out.

Once you get state housing it's permanent unless you are a really bad tenant. As JS said.
John Smith wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 6:21pm:

Setanta wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 6:04pm:

I wonder why the guy was removed from state housing?

They NEVER remove anyone except the worst of the worst, even then it's only when they don't pay the rent for months that they actually kick you out.

At least that was the case in NSW. Not sure what SA's rules are like.

Why aren't you paying out on him?

But sure it's people like me that stop him keeping a home.

No. I know nothing more than the article stated about his personal circumstances.

You'll notice how accordingly, i didn't leap to judgement.

Unlike you.

Quite right and on that information it seemed very likely he was booted from state housing. IE a very bad tenant. Bad tenants are going to find it hard to get accomodation.

Back to top

IP Logged

Jasin Gold Member Offline Posts: 49010 Gender:	Re: He Applied For 472 Rental Properties Reply #31 - Mar 17^th, 2023 at 7:52pm Maybe Peccary can send him a Coffee voucher for $10?
Back to top	AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY. IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 138317
Gender: male

Re: He Applied For 472 Rental Properties
Reply #32 - Mar 17^th, 2023 at 7:52pm

Setanta wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 7:43pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 7:35pm:

Setanta wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 7:27pm:

mothra wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 7:16pm:

Setanta wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 7:12pm:

As you say, there is a housing crisis, why would someone give up guaranteed 25% of their income rent to go private, especially if they have pets?

He didn't.

"Whereas just five years ago when I was in social housing, it was capped at 25 per cent," he said.

Tell us how you know he didn't give it up and if he didn't give it up then he was tossed out.

Once you get state housing it's permanent unless you are a really bad tenant. As JS said.
John Smith wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 6:21pm:

Setanta wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 6:04pm:

I wonder why the guy was removed from state housing?

They NEVER remove anyone except the worst of the worst, even then it's only when they don't pay the rent for months that they actually kick you out.

At least that was the case in NSW. Not sure what SA's rules are like.

Why aren't you paying out on him?

But sure it's people like me that stop him keeping a home.

You made the claim, thus the onus is on you to provide the proof.

"I wonder why the guy was removed from state housing?"

So, where is the proof he was removed?

Idiot, that's a question, not a claim. Are you that bad in court defending the workers?

You are asking why he was removed.

So, I ask again: where is your proof that he was removed?

Back to top

IP Logged

Jasin Gold Member Offline Posts: 49010 Gender:	Re: He Applied For 472 Rental Properties Reply #33 - Mar 17^th, 2023 at 7:54pm No proof needed. A guaranteed sure bet win at 35/1 in Roulette that he lands on the number "Houso Bludger". Go on Peccary. Buy him a coffee.
Back to top	AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY. IP Logged

Black Orchid

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 5813
Gender: female

Re: He Applied For 472 Rental Properties
Reply #34 - Mar 17^th, 2023 at 7:54pm

Setanta wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 7:46pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 7:40pm:

The whole article should sound an alarm for any thinking person. 472 properties and he couldn't get one? Not likely.

You don't give up social housing unless you have alternative permanent accommodation and it's almost impossible to get kicked out.

It seems he's sharing a house now with other people because his track record is atrocious and no-one will touch him.

~

A HOUSING Trust tenant has turned his spare bedroom into a hotel room and advertised it for rent at $350 a week on a popular tourist accommodation website.

It is understood the tenant, Hayden Patterson, pays less than $100 a week in taxpayer-subsidised rent for the two-bedroom townhouse at Goodwood, but charged $65 a night for the spare bedroom.

Mr Patterson has been advertising the bedroom on the international website Airbnb, of which he has been a member since 2012, saying it can accommodate up to six guests a rate of almost $350 for a minimum of two nights.

https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/housing-trust-tenant-investi...

In a separate case, housing trust tenant Hayden Patterson has been caught advertising a spare room in his property in Goodward - south of Adelaide - for $65 a night on tourist accommodation website AirBnB.

The advertisement further stated the bedroom could sleep up to six guests for a minimum of two nights for about $350, The Advertiser reports.

With the consent of Housing SA, trust tenants are allowed to lease out a room however they could not confirm whether permission had been granted to Mr Patterson.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2999987/The-disgraceful-pictures-tax-do...

That was in 2015 and he's been rattling around ever since and obviously didn't learn a valuable lesson because he was caught twice. Too bad so sad. No sympathy.

My bad...

It's not your bad at all. You merely queried why he (most likely) was removed from state housing and the vulture(s) swooped.

It was a more than reasonable query and undeserving of attack.

Back to top

IP Logged

Jasin Gold Member Offline Posts: 49010 Gender:	Re: He Applied For 472 Rental Properties Reply #35 - Mar 17^th, 2023 at 7:56pm You don't need 'proof' to see the truth of the matter.
Back to top	AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY. IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 35489
Gender: female

Re: He Applied For 472 Rental Properties
Reply #36 - Mar 17^th, 2023 at 7:57pm

Setanta wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 7:51pm:

mothra wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 7:38pm:

Setanta wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 7:27pm:

mothra wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 7:16pm:

Setanta wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 7:12pm:

As you say, there is a housing crisis, why would someone give up guaranteed 25% of their income rent to go private, especially if they have pets?

He didn't.

"Whereas just five years ago when I was in social housing, it was capped at 25 per cent," he said.

Tell us how you know he didn't give it up and if he didn't give it up then he was tossed out.

Once you get state housing it's permanent unless you are a really bad tenant. As JS said.
John Smith wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 6:21pm:

Setanta wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 6:04pm:

I wonder why the guy was removed from state housing?

They NEVER remove anyone except the worst of the worst, even then it's only when they don't pay the rent for months that they actually kick you out.

At least that was the case in NSW. Not sure what SA's rules are like.

Why aren't you paying out on him?

But sure it's people like me that stop him keeping a home.

No. I know nothing more than the article stated about his personal circumstances.

You'll notice how accordingly, i didn't leap to judgement.

Unlike you.

Quite right and on that information it seemed very likely he was booted from state housing. IE a very bad tenant. Bad tenants are going to find it hard to get accomodation.

You mean the 2 aqrticles reporting the same incident BO cites as being "caught twice"?

You may or may not have noticed this bit:

"With the consent of Housing SA, trust tenants are allowed to lease out a room however they could not confirm whether permission had been granted to Mr Patterson."

You have nothing other than prejudice to base your assertion that he was kicked out of public housing.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

Setanta

Gold Member

Offline

\/ Peace man!

Posts: 16616
Northern NSW
Gender: male

Re: He Applied For 472 Rental Properties
Reply #37 - Mar 17^th, 2023 at 7:57pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 7:52pm:

Setanta wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 7:43pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 7:35pm:

Setanta wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 7:27pm:

mothra wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 7:16pm:

Setanta wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 7:12pm:

As you say, there is a housing crisis, why would someone give up guaranteed 25% of their income rent to go private, especially if they have pets?

He didn't.

"Whereas just five years ago when I was in social housing, it was capped at 25 per cent," he said.

Tell us how you know he didn't give it up and if he didn't give it up then he was tossed out.

Once you get state housing it's permanent unless you are a really bad tenant. As JS said.
John Smith wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 6:21pm:

Setanta wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 6:04pm:

I wonder why the guy was removed from state housing?

They NEVER remove anyone except the worst of the worst, even then it's only when they don't pay the rent for months that they actually kick you out.

At least that was the case in NSW. Not sure what SA's rules are like.

Why aren't you paying out on him?

But sure it's people like me that stop him keeping a home.

You made the claim, thus the onus is on you to provide the proof.

"I wonder why the guy was removed from state housing?"

So, where is the proof he was removed?

Idiot, that's a question, not a claim. Are you that bad in court defending the workers?

You are asking why he was removed.

So, I ask again: where is your proof that he was removed?

Jesus, seriously? He was and is removed from public housing and I know this because he said so, he was on it 5 years ago. He was in it, now he's not. And BO's post shows why. My question has been answered. Suck it up, simp.

Back to top

IP Logged

mothra Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 35489 Gender:	Re: He Applied For 472 Rental Properties Reply #38 - Mar 17^th, 2023 at 7:57pm Black Orchid wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 7:50pm: Don't alter my post by cutting most of it out. I believe that is against the rules. No. It's not.
Back to top	If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning. IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 35489
Gender: female

Re: He Applied For 472 Rental Properties
Reply #39 - Mar 17^th, 2023 at 7:59pm

Black Orchid wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 7:50pm:

.

He was kicked out because he was advertising on AirBnB. The dishonest way you virtue signal in order to attack posters you don't like is embarrassing to watch.

I don't believe anyone said he left during the housing crisis. Roll Eyes

You don't know he was kicked out at all.

And Setanta most certainly did question why someone would leave social housing through the housing crisis.

Do you think you could go back and check for yourself? Or would you like to be spoon fed?

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

Black Orchid Gold Member Offline Posts: 5813 Gender:	Re: He Applied For 472 Rental Properties Reply #40 - Mar 17^th, 2023 at 7:59pm Jasin wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 7:56pm: You don't need 'proof' to see the truth of the matter. Most people don't Lol. Using Google is a logical move before casting judgment on other posters too.
Back to top	IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 35489
Gender: female

Re: He Applied For 472 Rental Properties
Reply #41 - Mar 17^th, 2023 at 8:00pm

Black Orchid wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 7:59pm:

Jasin wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 7:56pm:

You don't need 'proof' to see the truth of the matter.
Wink

Most people don't Lol. Using Google is a logical move before casting judgment on other posters too.

You've proved nothing aside from your judgement of the homeless.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 138317 Gender:	Re: He Applied For 472 Rental Properties Reply #42 - Mar 17^th, 2023 at 8:01pm Black Orchid wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 7:50pm: ... He was kicked out because he was advertising on AirBnB. ... Where does it say that?
Back to top	IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 35489
Gender: female

Re: He Applied For 472 Rental Properties
Reply #43 - Mar 17^th, 2023 at 8:01pm

Setanta wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 7:57pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 7:52pm:

Setanta wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 7:43pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 7:35pm:

Setanta wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 7:27pm:

mothra wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 7:16pm:

Setanta wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 7:12pm:

As you say, there is a housing crisis, why would someone give up guaranteed 25% of their income rent to go private, especially if they have pets?

He didn't.

"Whereas just five years ago when I was in social housing, it was capped at 25 per cent," he said.

Tell us how you know he didn't give it up and if he didn't give it up then he was tossed out.

Once you get state housing it's permanent unless you are a really bad tenant. As JS said.
John Smith wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 6:21pm:

Setanta wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 6:04pm:

I wonder why the guy was removed from state housing?

They NEVER remove anyone except the worst of the worst, even then it's only when they don't pay the rent for months that they actually kick you out.

At least that was the case in NSW. Not sure what SA's rules are like.

Why aren't you paying out on him?

But sure it's people like me that stop him keeping a home.

You made the claim, thus the onus is on you to provide the proof.

"I wonder why the guy was removed from state housing?"

So, where is the proof he was removed?

Idiot, that's a question, not a claim. Are you that bad in court defending the workers?

You are asking why he was removed.

So, I ask again: where is your proof that he was removed?

Jesus, seriously? He was and is removed from public housing and I know this because he said so, he was on it 5 years ago. He was in it, now he's not. And BO's post shows why. My question has been answered. Suck it up, simp.

He said he left public housing. He didn't say he was removed.

You said he was removed. And have been unable to qualify it.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

mothra Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 35489 Gender:	Re: He Applied For 472 Rental Properties Reply #44 - Mar 17^th, 2023 at 8:02pm greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 8:01pm: Black Orchid wrote on Mar 17^th, 2023 at 7:50pm: ... He was kicked out because he was advertising on AirBnB. ... Where does it say that? It doesn't. It does say that as a public housing tenant you are allowed to rent out a room though.
Back to top	If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning. IP Logged