Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 ... 27
Send Topic Print
Trump Indicted (Read 6849 times)
aquascoot
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 34905
Gender: male
Re: Trump Indicted
Reply #180 - Apr 4th, 2023 at 5:15pm
 
Karnal wrote on Apr 4th, 2023 at 3:48pm:
aquascoot wrote on Apr 4th, 2023 at 5:16am:
Karnal wrote on Apr 3rd, 2023 at 8:30pm:
aquascoot wrote on Apr 3rd, 2023 at 7:03pm:
Karnal wrote on Apr 3rd, 2023 at 6:53pm:
Dnarever wrote on Apr 3rd, 2023 at 4:28pm:
Karnal wrote on Apr 3rd, 2023 at 10:21am:
Quote:
you open his mouth and turn the crank and the same stuff comes out .
its frankly boring


Oh? Not like low-taxed, well-run, law and order states?

Most stimulating. I'm sure fiscal policy and public sector efficiency matrixes really float Ron D's boat.

Still, it's a lot more fun bussing your illegals up to Washington for the fake news, no?

Not exactly efficient interstate liaison, but it's guaranteed a monologue on Tucker.

DRAIN THE SWAMP!!!


Quote:
it's a lot more fun bussing your illegals up to Washington for the fake news, no?


Actually he didn't have any illegals - he had to import them. Cost his state a fortune in tax payer funds ( or more likely federal grants) to do it. The issue is that there is a name for doing this. It's called people smuggling.

He was very lucky that none of the refugees he moved into freezing climates seem to have died. That wasn't his fault just luck.


True, but nothing says low-taxed, well-run, law and order states like bussing your homeless unannounced to Washington DC, now does it?

Besides, Ron's using government funded lawyers to fight the civil suit for human trafficking, so that shows thrift, right? He even had laws changed to prevent personal liability, so that shows accountability.

No matter how you look at this, Ron comes out smelling like roses - on Fox, anyway.

It's a good thing Aquascoot had the volume turned down for Ron's speech. We wouldn't want anyone getting the wrong idea, no?

I think he's switched back to Dear Leader again, it's hard to tell.

He must be channel-surfing.



you need to be open to all sources .

success leaves clues.

studying a governor or a president is a worthwhile investment.

we also need to study failure.

so studying gweg or mattyfisk is a worthwhile investment also


Agreed. It might be worth studying how a guy like Sleepy Joe can pass a jobs & infrastructure bill and see unemployment drop to a record low of 3.6%.

It might also be worth reflecting on your view of leaders as entertainers and explore how things actually get done.

Either that, or chow down with the chodes, channel surfing Ron D speeches with the sound turned down.



incorrect and badly so.


young men (chodes) arent even bothered trying, they are so demoralised by the weak sauce administration


Unlike the Great Depression, however, today's work crisis is not an unemployment crisis. Only a tiny fraction of workless American men nowadays are actually looking for employment. Instead we have witnessed a mass exodus of men from the workforce altogether. At this writing, nearly 7 million civilian non-institutionalized men between the ages of 25 and 54 are neither working nor looking for work — over four times as many as are formally unemployed. Between 1965 and 2015, the percentage of prime-age U.S. men not in the labor force shot up from 3.3% to 11.7%.


Incorrect, eh?

Here's Wikipedia, Aquascoot. Feel free to update with your figures.

Kindly add your details on the chodes please.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unemployment_in_the_United_States



you are becoming as demented as brandon.

the whole point is if you add the 3% rate of those looking for work to the 12 % rate of those who couldnt be bothered to look and just live in mums basement, you get 15 %, the highest rate since the great depression of fit healthy men being idle .

no way to run an economy when there are record job vacancies in construction , tourism, hospitality and agriculture
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96197
Gender: male
Re: Trump Indicted
Reply #181 - Apr 4th, 2023 at 5:36pm
 
aquascoot wrote on Apr 4th, 2023 at 5:15pm:
Karnal wrote on Apr 4th, 2023 at 3:48pm:
aquascoot wrote on Apr 4th, 2023 at 5:16am:
Karnal wrote on Apr 3rd, 2023 at 8:30pm:
aquascoot wrote on Apr 3rd, 2023 at 7:03pm:
Karnal wrote on Apr 3rd, 2023 at 6:53pm:
Dnarever wrote on Apr 3rd, 2023 at 4:28pm:
Karnal wrote on Apr 3rd, 2023 at 10:21am:
Quote:
you open his mouth and turn the crank and the same stuff comes out .
its frankly boring


Oh? Not like low-taxed, well-run, law and order states?

Most stimulating. I'm sure fiscal policy and public sector efficiency matrixes really float Ron D's boat.

Still, it's a lot more fun bussing your illegals up to Washington for the fake news, no?

Not exactly efficient interstate liaison, but it's guaranteed a monologue on Tucker.

DRAIN THE SWAMP!!!


Quote:
it's a lot more fun bussing your illegals up to Washington for the fake news, no?


Actually he didn't have any illegals - he had to import them. Cost his state a fortune in tax payer funds ( or more likely federal grants) to do it. The issue is that there is a name for doing this. It's called people smuggling.

He was very lucky that none of the refugees he moved into freezing climates seem to have died. That wasn't his fault just luck.


True, but nothing says low-taxed, well-run, law and order states like bussing your homeless unannounced to Washington DC, now does it?

Besides, Ron's using government funded lawyers to fight the civil suit for human trafficking, so that shows thrift, right? He even had laws changed to prevent personal liability, so that shows accountability.

No matter how you look at this, Ron comes out smelling like roses - on Fox, anyway.

It's a good thing Aquascoot had the volume turned down for Ron's speech. We wouldn't want anyone getting the wrong idea, no?

I think he's switched back to Dear Leader again, it's hard to tell.

He must be channel-surfing.



you need to be open to all sources .

success leaves clues.

studying a governor or a president is a worthwhile investment.

we also need to study failure.

so studying gweg or mattyfisk is a worthwhile investment also


Agreed. It might be worth studying how a guy like Sleepy Joe can pass a jobs & infrastructure bill and see unemployment drop to a record low of 3.6%.

It might also be worth reflecting on your view of leaders as entertainers and explore how things actually get done.

Either that, or chow down with the chodes, channel surfing Ron D speeches with the sound turned down.



incorrect and badly so.


young men (chodes) arent even bothered trying, they are so demoralised by the weak sauce administration


Unlike the Great Depression, however, today's work crisis is not an unemployment crisis. Only a tiny fraction of workless American men nowadays are actually looking for employment. Instead we have witnessed a mass exodus of men from the workforce altogether. At this writing, nearly 7 million civilian non-institutionalized men between the ages of 25 and 54 are neither working nor looking for work — over four times as many as are formally unemployed. Between 1965 and 2015, the percentage of prime-age U.S. men not in the labor force shot up from 3.3% to 11.7%.


Incorrect, eh?

Here's Wikipedia, Aquascoot. Feel free to update with your figures.

Kindly add your details on the chodes please.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unemployment_in_the_United_States



you are becoming as demented as brandon.

the whole point is if you add the 3% rate of those looking for work to the 12 % rate of those who couldnt be bothered to look and just live in mums basement, you get 15 %, the highest rate since the great depression of fit healthy men being idle .

no way to run an economy when there are record job vacancies in construction , tourism, hospitality and agriculture


I know, it's just a bit strange how you omitted that 12% when the big fella was in charge.

Look, forget the current stats, you're going to need to go back and change the 2017 ones.

Remember how Dear Leader solved Obama's unemployment DISASTER just by hanging out in the Oval Office for 4 hours a day, going on Twitter, playing golf and basicly being awesome?

He fixed that crisis up in his first two months, no?

Then he moved onto the wall, built 27 km of steel fencing and solved that one too.

Put Jared in charge of the Middle East and fixed world peace.

Tweeted about Rocket Man and stopped Kim's nukes.

Kept Vlad out of Ukraine, got Mexico to agree to pay for the Wall, stopped manufacturing moving to Chi-na, made Europe pay their bills for NATO, and on and on.

It would just be nice to set the record straight  dear. Can you fix up Wikipedia for us?

Cheers.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Gordon
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20673
Gordon
Gender: male
Re: Trump Indicted
Reply #182 - Apr 4th, 2023 at 8:01pm
 
Next time it will be a Democrat convicted on concocted charges.

Checkout this lizard

https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS8spjrCe/
Back to top
 

IBI
 
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 58835
Here
Gender: male
Re: Trump Indicted
Reply #183 - Apr 4th, 2023 at 8:37pm
 
Gordon wrote on Apr 4th, 2023 at 8:01pm:
Next time it will be a Democrat convicted on concocted charges.

Checkout this lizard

https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS8spjrCe/


Nothing concocted here. Trump does not even deny it and his previous lawyer went to prison for the crime when the only reason that Trump wasn't prosecuted was because he was the president. They even said it in the court case.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Online



Posts: 49065
Gender: male
Re: Trump Indicted
Reply #184 - Apr 4th, 2023 at 8:37pm
 
That's disgusting. The Democrats have lost the plot!

Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 58835
Here
Gender: male
Re: Trump Indicted
Reply #185 - Apr 4th, 2023 at 8:39pm
 
aquascoot wrote on Apr 4th, 2023 at 5:15pm:
you are becoming as demented as brandon.

the whole point is if you add the 3% rate of those looking for work to the 12 % rate of those who couldnt be bothered to look and just live in mums basement, you get 15 %, the highest rate since the great depression of fit healthy men being idle .

no way to run an economy when there are record job vacancies in construction , tourism, hospitality and agriculture


Sounds a bit like if your aunty had a pair.....

Funny thing is that if you add the same numbers under Trump or any other president you likely get the same result.

It even works in Australia. I doubt anybody counts their real unemployment rate.

The point is that they all do it the same so it works as far as showing trends. The current US number is very good in historical terms and it is counted the same way.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 138441
Gender: male
Re: Trump Indicted
Reply #186 - Apr 4th, 2023 at 9:00pm
 
Gordon wrote on Apr 4th, 2023 at 8:01pm:
Next time it will be a Democrat convicted on concocted charges.



Concocted charges - really?

What are they?

The indictment is still sealed, so I'd be amazed if you knew what the charges actually are.

By all means though, tell us what they are.

Coz, ... I'm curious.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Online



Posts: 49065
Gender: male
Re: Trump Indicted
Reply #187 - Apr 4th, 2023 at 9:02pm
 
More like because you're gay and stupid, than curious. Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 74862
Gender: male
Re: Trump Indicted
Reply #188 - Apr 4th, 2023 at 9:40pm
 
[quote author=greggerypeccary link=1680221116/186#186 date=1680606008][quote author=Gordon link=1680221116/182#182 date=1680602513]Next time it will be a Democrat convicted on concocted charges.

[/quote]

Concocted charges - really?

What [i]are[/i] they?

The indictment is still sealed, so I'd be amazed if you knew what the charges actually are.

By all means though, tell us what they are.

Coz, ... I'm curious.[/quote]

Turdie has been smoking those Bondi floaters again
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Gordon
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20673
Gordon
Gender: male
Re: Trump Indicted
Reply #189 - Apr 4th, 2023 at 9:47pm
 
[quote author=John_Smith link=1680221116/188#188 date=1680608437][quote author=greggerypeccary link=1680221116/186#186 date=1680606008][quote author=Gordon link=1680221116/182#182 date=1680602513]Next time it will be a Democrat convicted on concocted charges.

[/quote]

Concocted charges - really?

What [i]are[/i] they?

The indictment is still sealed, so I'd be amazed if you knew what the charges actually are.

By all means though, tell us what they are.

Coz, ... I'm curious.[/quote]

Turdie has been smoking those Bondi floaters again [/quote]

LoL, don't breed ya dribbling mong from Dapto.
Back to top
 

IBI
 
IP Logged
 
Gordon
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20673
Gordon
Gender: male
Re: Trump Indicted
Reply #190 - Apr 4th, 2023 at 9:50pm
 
Hey mongaloid, have you slammed on your brakes doing 100ks with a car behind you recently? Is that how you ended up brain damaged?
Back to top
 

IBI
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 74862
Gender: male
Re: Trump Indicted
Reply #191 - Apr 4th, 2023 at 10:00pm
 
I changed my mind, that's not turdies selfie he keeps putting up  the guy in that photo looks like a genius when compared to turdie.  Grin
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 138441
Gender: male
Re: Trump Indicted
Reply #192 - Apr 4th, 2023 at 10:17pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 4th, 2023 at 9:00pm:
Gordon wrote on Apr 4th, 2023 at 8:01pm:
Next time it will be a Democrat convicted on concocted charges.



Concocted charges - really?

What are they?

The indictment is still sealed, so I'd be amazed if you knew what the charges actually are.

By all means though, tell us what they are.

Coz, ... I'm curious.


Gordon?

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96197
Gender: male
Re: Trump Indicted
Reply #193 - Apr 5th, 2023 at 12:36am
 
Gordon wrote on Apr 4th, 2023 at 8:01pm:
Next time it will be a Democrat convicted on concocted charges.

Checkout this lizard

https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS8spjrCe/


Sorry, Gordon, was he a naughty old sex tourist?

You havent said. Please explain?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 138441
Gender: male
Re: Trump Indicted
Reply #194 - Apr 5th, 2023 at 7:48am
 

34 felony counts of falsifying business records.

Oh dear   Smiley

Prosecutors said they unsealed the indictment against former President Donald Trump and gave a copy of it, along with the statement of facts, to Trump's counsel around 1:30 p.m. ET when the former president arrived at the beginning of the arraignment.

Prosecutors said Trump was also fingerprinted at that time. The defense was given a copy of Trump's fingerprint sheet during the proceeding.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 ... 27
Send Topic Print