Australian Politics Forum - Elon Musk Slaughters BBC Reporter In Live Intervie

MeisterEckhart

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 12515
Gender: male

Re: Elon Musk Slaughters BBC Reporter In Live Intervie
Reply #30 - Apr 13^th, 2023 at 5:24pm

Sophia wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 5:20pm:

Carl D wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 3:33pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 3:25pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 2:37pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 2:24pm:

Lol

[url]https://s3.memeshappen.com/memes/They-said-I-could-be-anything-I-beca
me-a-PRETZEL-meme-55281.jpg[/url]

I'd bet that doesn't disgust you.

The fact that you twist yourself inside out in a pathetic attempt to justify your anti-science stance doesn't disgust me - it just amuses me.

"They don't report on side-effects".

Actually, they do - and that has now been proven.

"They don't report on the serious side-effects"

Nek minnit!

"They reported on a serious side-effect".

You can't make this stuff up Grin

Sure confuses the heck out of me.

Mind you, I have an excuse... I've just finished trudging through aquascoot's latest word salad and it's taking a while for me to recover from that. Roll Eyes

There’s nothing confusing to me about it… but then again I think differently… perhaps.
Both statements are correct. Given the correct timeline.
I see these statements as something summed up at the time and then at advancing times.
Hence changes….
For instance ….

"They don't report on the serious side-effects"

That’s exactly what was happening… in fact way back when test results were being conducted … that 75 year data withholding bs…. Yes… withholding real results ….
Like why? Something to hide maybe Huh

And then….

"They reported on a serious side-effect".

Yes… it’s eventually coming to surface… and there’s more in time to come….
It’s just the tip of the iceberg.

The serious side effects were being withheld… swept under the carpet…
That’s why there were none reported earlier.

PS: Some of the links trying to convince people of c-vax safety… from 2022 and 2021….
We are almost mid 2023 now.
News (and science) change tact.

And as if it couldn't be made more obvious that there is a political motive behind the under-reporting, both sides of the UK Parliament walked out twice when the subject of vaccine side effects was raised in the UK Parliament.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 137758
Gender: male

Re: Elon Musk Slaughters BBC Reporter In Live Intervie
Reply #31 - Apr 13^th, 2023 at 6:12pm

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 5:24pm:

Sophia wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 5:20pm:

Carl D wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 3:33pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 3:25pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 2:37pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 2:24pm:

Lol

[url]https://s3.memeshappen.com/memes/They-said-I-could-be-anything-I-beca
me-a-PRETZEL-meme-55281.jpg[/url]

I'd bet that doesn't disgust you.

The fact that you twist yourself inside out in a pathetic attempt to justify your anti-science stance doesn't disgust me - it just amuses me.

"They don't report on side-effects".

Actually, they do - and that has now been proven.

"They don't report on the serious side-effects"

Nek minnit!

"They reported on a serious side-effect".

You can't make this stuff up Grin

Sure confuses the heck out of me.

Mind you, I have an excuse... I've just finished trudging through aquascoot's latest word salad and it's taking a while for me to recover from that. Roll Eyes

There’s nothing confusing to me about it… but then again I think differently… perhaps.
Both statements are correct. Given the correct timeline.
I see these statements as something summed up at the time and then at advancing times.
Hence changes….
For instance ….

"They don't report on the serious side-effects"

That’s exactly what was happening… in fact way back when test results were being conducted … that 75 year data withholding bs…. Yes… withholding real results ….
Like why? Something to hide maybe Huh

And then….

"They reported on a serious side-effect".

Yes… it’s eventually coming to surface… and there’s more in time to come….
It’s just the tip of the iceberg.

The serious side effects were being withheld… swept under the carpet…
That’s why there were none reported earlier.

PS: Some of the links trying to convince people of c-vax safety… from 2022 and 2021….
We are almost mid 2023 now.
News (and science) change tact.

And as if it couldn't be made more obvious that there is a political motive behind the under-reporting, ...

Lol

You literally posted a link a few hours ago from the BBC saying that someone died as a result of the vax.

"Under-reporting" ? FFS, you couldn't lie straight in bed.

Back to top

IP Logged

MeisterEckhart

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 12515
Gender: male

Re: Elon Musk Slaughters BBC Reporter In Live Intervie
Reply #32 - Apr 13^th, 2023 at 6:36pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 6:12pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 5:24pm:

Sophia wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 5:20pm:

Carl D wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 3:33pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 3:25pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 2:37pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 2:24pm:

Lol

[url]https://s3.memeshappen.com/memes/They-said-I-could-be-anything-I-beca
me-a-PRETZEL-meme-55281.jpg[/url]

I'd bet that doesn't disgust you.

The fact that you twist yourself inside out in a pathetic attempt to justify your anti-science stance doesn't disgust me - it just amuses me.

"They don't report on side-effects".

Actually, they do - and that has now been proven.

"They don't report on the serious side-effects"

Nek minnit!

"They reported on a serious side-effect".

You can't make this stuff up Grin

Sure confuses the heck out of me.

Mind you, I have an excuse... I've just finished trudging through aquascoot's latest word salad and it's taking a while for me to recover from that. Roll Eyes

There’s nothing confusing to me about it… but then again I think differently… perhaps.
Both statements are correct. Given the correct timeline.
I see these statements as something summed up at the time and then at advancing times.
Hence changes….
For instance ….

"They don't report on the serious side-effects"

That’s exactly what was happening… in fact way back when test results were being conducted … that 75 year data withholding bs…. Yes… withholding real results ….
Like why? Something to hide maybe Huh

And then….

"They reported on a serious side-effect".

Yes… it’s eventually coming to surface… and there’s more in time to come….
It’s just the tip of the iceberg.

The serious side effects were being withheld… swept under the carpet…
That’s why there were none reported earlier.

PS: Some of the links trying to convince people of c-vax safety… from 2022 and 2021….
We are almost mid 2023 now.
News (and science) change tact.

And as if it couldn't be made more obvious that there is a political motive behind the under-reporting, ...

Lol

You literally posted a link a few hours ago from the BBC saying that someone died as a result of the vax.

"Under-reporting" ? FFS, you couldn't lie straight in bed.

No, those were your links, you nonce - all published 1 to 2 years ago.

Why did Thalidomide stop becoming the science for morning sickness? Why was Frances Kelsey defamed by big pharma and government for preventing the introduction of Thalidomide into the US?

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 137758
Gender: male

Re: Elon Musk Slaughters BBC Reporter In Live Intervie
Reply #33 - Apr 13^th, 2023 at 6:56pm

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 6:36pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 6:12pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 5:24pm:

Sophia wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 5:20pm:

Carl D wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 3:33pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 3:25pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 2:37pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 2:24pm:

Lol

[url]https://s3.memeshappen.com/memes/They-said-I-could-be-anything-I-beca
me-a-PRETZEL-meme-55281.jpg[/url]

I'd bet that doesn't disgust you.

The fact that you twist yourself inside out in a pathetic attempt to justify your anti-science stance doesn't disgust me - it just amuses me.

"They don't report on side-effects".

Actually, they do - and that has now been proven.

"They don't report on the serious side-effects"

Nek minnit!

"They reported on a serious side-effect".

You can't make this stuff up Grin

Sure confuses the heck out of me.

Mind you, I have an excuse... I've just finished trudging through aquascoot's latest word salad and it's taking a while for me to recover from that. Roll Eyes

There’s nothing confusing to me about it… but then again I think differently… perhaps.
Both statements are correct. Given the correct timeline.
I see these statements as something summed up at the time and then at advancing times.
Hence changes….
For instance ….

"They don't report on the serious side-effects"

That’s exactly what was happening… in fact way back when test results were being conducted … that 75 year data withholding bs…. Yes… withholding real results ….
Like why? Something to hide maybe Huh

And then….

"They reported on a serious side-effect".

Yes… it’s eventually coming to surface… and there’s more in time to come….
It’s just the tip of the iceberg.

The serious side effects were being withheld… swept under the carpet…
That’s why there were none reported earlier.

PS: Some of the links trying to convince people of c-vax safety… from 2022 and 2021….
We are almost mid 2023 now.
News (and science) change tact.

And as if it couldn't be made more obvious that there is a political motive behind the under-reporting, ...

Lol

You literally posted a link a few hours ago from the BBC saying that someone died as a result of the vax.

"Under-reporting" ? FFS, you couldn't lie straight in bed.

No, those were your links, you nonce - all published 1 to 2 years ago.

No.

YOU posted a story from the BBC reporting a death.

FFS, you can't even remember something from a few hours ago.

YOU: "The irony is that a BBC reporter Lisa Shaw (44) died a week after receiving the AstraZeneca vaccine in May 2021. Her autopsy report from the coroner identifies the vaccine as the cause."

By the way, I'll give you 2 minutes to delete the "nonce" reference.

Back to top

IP Logged

Gordon Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 20611 Gordon Gender:	Re: Elon Musk Slaughters BBC Reporter In Live Intervie Reply #34 - Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:03pm
Back to top	IBI IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 137758
Gender: male

Re: Elon Musk Slaughters BBC Reporter In Live Intervie
Reply #35 - Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:09pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 6:56pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 6:36pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 6:12pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 5:24pm:

Sophia wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 5:20pm:

Carl D wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 3:33pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 3:25pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 2:37pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 2:24pm:

Lol

[url]https://s3.memeshappen.com/memes/They-said-I-could-be-anything-I-beca
me-a-PRETZEL-meme-55281.jpg[/url]

I'd bet that doesn't disgust you.

The fact that you twist yourself inside out in a pathetic attempt to justify your anti-science stance doesn't disgust me - it just amuses me.

"They don't report on side-effects".

Actually, they do - and that has now been proven.

"They don't report on the serious side-effects"

Nek minnit!

"They reported on a serious side-effect".

You can't make this stuff up Grin

Sure confuses the heck out of me.

Mind you, I have an excuse... I've just finished trudging through aquascoot's latest word salad and it's taking a while for me to recover from that. Roll Eyes

There’s nothing confusing to me about it… but then again I think differently… perhaps.
Both statements are correct. Given the correct timeline.
I see these statements as something summed up at the time and then at advancing times.
Hence changes….
For instance ….

"They don't report on the serious side-effects"

That’s exactly what was happening… in fact way back when test results were being conducted … that 75 year data withholding bs…. Yes… withholding real results ….
Like why? Something to hide maybe Huh

And then….

"They reported on a serious side-effect".

Yes… it’s eventually coming to surface… and there’s more in time to come….
It’s just the tip of the iceberg.

The serious side effects were being withheld… swept under the carpet…
That’s why there were none reported earlier.

PS: Some of the links trying to convince people of c-vax safety… from 2022 and 2021….
We are almost mid 2023 now.
News (and science) change tact.

And as if it couldn't be made more obvious that there is a political motive behind the under-reporting, ...

Lol

You literally posted a link a few hours ago from the BBC saying that someone died as a result of the vax.

"Under-reporting" ? FFS, you couldn't lie straight in bed.

No, those were your links, you nonce - all published 1 to 2 years ago.

No.

YOU posted a story from the BBC reporting a death.

FFS, you can't even remember something from a few hours ago.

YOU: "The irony is that a BBC reporter Lisa Shaw (44) died a week after receiving the AstraZeneca vaccine in May 2021. Her autopsy report from the coroner identifies the vaccine as the cause."

By the way, I'll give you 2 minutes to delete the "nonce" reference.

Well, I gave you more than 10 minutes to delete it.

You only have yourself to blame now.

Back to top

IP Logged

MeisterEckhart

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 12515
Gender: male

Re: Elon Musk Slaughters BBC Reporter In Live Intervie
Reply #36 - Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:10pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 6:56pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 6:36pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 6:12pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 5:24pm:

Sophia wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 5:20pm:

Carl D wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 3:33pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 3:25pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 2:37pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 2:24pm:

Lol

[url]https://s3.memeshappen.com/memes/They-said-I-could-be-anything-I-beca
me-a-PRETZEL-meme-55281.jpg[/url]

I'd bet that doesn't disgust you.

The fact that you twist yourself inside out in a pathetic attempt to justify your anti-science stance doesn't disgust me - it just amuses me.

"They don't report on side-effects".

Actually, they do - and that has now been proven.

"They don't report on the serious side-effects"

Nek minnit!

"They reported on a serious side-effect".

You can't make this stuff up Grin

Sure confuses the heck out of me.

Mind you, I have an excuse... I've just finished trudging through aquascoot's latest word salad and it's taking a while for me to recover from that. Roll Eyes

There’s nothing confusing to me about it… but then again I think differently… perhaps.
Both statements are correct. Given the correct timeline.
I see these statements as something summed up at the time and then at advancing times.
Hence changes….
For instance ….

"They don't report on the serious side-effects"

That’s exactly what was happening… in fact way back when test results were being conducted … that 75 year data withholding bs…. Yes… withholding real results ….
Like why? Something to hide maybe Huh

And then….

"They reported on a serious side-effect".

Yes… it’s eventually coming to surface… and there’s more in time to come….
It’s just the tip of the iceberg.

The serious side effects were being withheld… swept under the carpet…
That’s why there were none reported earlier.

PS: Some of the links trying to convince people of c-vax safety… from 2022 and 2021….
We are almost mid 2023 now.
News (and science) change tact.

And as if it couldn't be made more obvious that there is a political motive behind the under-reporting, ...

Lol

You literally posted a link a few hours ago from the BBC saying that someone died as a result of the vax.

"Under-reporting" ? FFS, you couldn't lie straight in bed.

No, those were your links, you nonce - all published 1 to 2 years ago.

No.

YOU posted a story from the BBC reporting a death.

FFS, you can't even remember something from a few hours ago.

YOU: "The irony is that a BBC reporter Lisa Shaw (44) died a week after receiving the AstraZeneca vaccine in May 2021. Her autopsy report from the coroner identifies the vaccine as the cause."

By the way, I'll give you 2 minutes to delete the "nonce" reference.

That was one comment on a report about one vaccine victim who was also a BBC reporter.

There are 75 complainants preparing to sue and at least 1500 people who are claiming injury from the vaccine. It's getting as bad as Thalidomide.

'The science', eh... Like it's a noun.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 137758
Gender: male

Re: Elon Musk Slaughters BBC Reporter In Live Intervie
Reply #37 - Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:12pm

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:10pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 6:56pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 6:36pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 6:12pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 5:24pm:

Sophia wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 5:20pm:

Carl D wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 3:33pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 3:25pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 2:37pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 2:24pm:

Lol

[url]https://s3.memeshappen.com/memes/They-said-I-could-be-anything-I-beca
me-a-PRETZEL-meme-55281.jpg[/url]

I'd bet that doesn't disgust you.

The fact that you twist yourself inside out in a pathetic attempt to justify your anti-science stance doesn't disgust me - it just amuses me.

"They don't report on side-effects".

Actually, they do - and that has now been proven.

"They don't report on the serious side-effects"

Nek minnit!

"They reported on a serious side-effect".

You can't make this stuff up Grin

Sure confuses the heck out of me.

Mind you, I have an excuse... I've just finished trudging through aquascoot's latest word salad and it's taking a while for me to recover from that. Roll Eyes

There’s nothing confusing to me about it… but then again I think differently… perhaps.
Both statements are correct. Given the correct timeline.
I see these statements as something summed up at the time and then at advancing times.
Hence changes….
For instance ….

"They don't report on the serious side-effects"

That’s exactly what was happening… in fact way back when test results were being conducted … that 75 year data withholding bs…. Yes… withholding real results ….
Like why? Something to hide maybe Huh

And then….

"They reported on a serious side-effect".

Yes… it’s eventually coming to surface… and there’s more in time to come….
It’s just the tip of the iceberg.

The serious side effects were being withheld… swept under the carpet…
That’s why there were none reported earlier.

PS: Some of the links trying to convince people of c-vax safety… from 2022 and 2021….
We are almost mid 2023 now.
News (and science) change tact.

And as if it couldn't be made more obvious that there is a political motive behind the under-reporting, ...

Lol

You literally posted a link a few hours ago from the BBC saying that someone died as a result of the vax.

"Under-reporting" ? FFS, you couldn't lie straight in bed.

No, those were your links, you nonce - all published 1 to 2 years ago.

No.

YOU posted a story from the BBC reporting a death.

FFS, you can't even remember something from a few hours ago.

YOU: "The irony is that a BBC reporter Lisa Shaw (44) died a week after receiving the AstraZeneca vaccine in May 2021. Her autopsy report from the coroner identifies the vaccine as the cause."

By the way, I'll give you 2 minutes to delete the "nonce" reference.

That was one comment on a report about one vaccine victim who was also a BBC reporter.

There are 75 complainants preparing to sue and at least 1500 people who are claiming injury from the vaccine. It's getting as bad as Thalidomide.

'The science', eh... Like it's a noun.

I gave you more than enough time to remove the reference to me as a "nonce".

I was more than fair.

It's up to the mods now.

Back to top

IP Logged

MeisterEckhart

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 12515
Gender: male

Re: Elon Musk Slaughters BBC Reporter In Live Intervie
Reply #38 - Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:13pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:12pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:10pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 6:56pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 6:36pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 6:12pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 5:24pm:

Sophia wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 5:20pm:

Carl D wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 3:33pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 3:25pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 2:37pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 2:24pm:

Lol

[url]https://s3.memeshappen.com/memes/They-said-I-could-be-anything-I-beca
me-a-PRETZEL-meme-55281.jpg[/url]

I'd bet that doesn't disgust you.

The fact that you twist yourself inside out in a pathetic attempt to justify your anti-science stance doesn't disgust me - it just amuses me.

"They don't report on side-effects".

Actually, they do - and that has now been proven.

"They don't report on the serious side-effects"

Nek minnit!

"They reported on a serious side-effect".

You can't make this stuff up Grin

Sure confuses the heck out of me.

Mind you, I have an excuse... I've just finished trudging through aquascoot's latest word salad and it's taking a while for me to recover from that. Roll Eyes

There’s nothing confusing to me about it… but then again I think differently… perhaps.
Both statements are correct. Given the correct timeline.
I see these statements as something summed up at the time and then at advancing times.
Hence changes….
For instance ….

"They don't report on the serious side-effects"

That’s exactly what was happening… in fact way back when test results were being conducted … that 75 year data withholding bs…. Yes… withholding real results ….
Like why? Something to hide maybe Huh

And then….

"They reported on a serious side-effect".

Yes… it’s eventually coming to surface… and there’s more in time to come….
It’s just the tip of the iceberg.

The serious side effects were being withheld… swept under the carpet…
That’s why there were none reported earlier.

PS: Some of the links trying to convince people of c-vax safety… from 2022 and 2021….
We are almost mid 2023 now.
News (and science) change tact.

And as if it couldn't be made more obvious that there is a political motive behind the under-reporting, ...

Lol

You literally posted a link a few hours ago from the BBC saying that someone died as a result of the vax.

"Under-reporting" ? FFS, you couldn't lie straight in bed.

No, those were your links, you nonce - all published 1 to 2 years ago.

No.

YOU posted a story from the BBC reporting a death.

FFS, you can't even remember something from a few hours ago.

YOU: "The irony is that a BBC reporter Lisa Shaw (44) died a week after receiving the AstraZeneca vaccine in May 2021. Her autopsy report from the coroner identifies the vaccine as the cause."

By the way, I'll give you 2 minutes to delete the "nonce" reference.

That was one comment on a report about one vaccine victim who was also a BBC reporter.

There are 75 complainants preparing to sue and at least 1500 people who are claiming injury from the vaccine. It's getting as bad as Thalidomide.

'The science', eh... Like it's a noun.

I gave you more than enough time to remove the reference to me as a "nonce".

I was more than fair.

It's up to the mods now.

What would you prefer? Twat?

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 137758
Gender: male

Re: Elon Musk Slaughters BBC Reporter In Live Intervie
Reply #39 - Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:15pm

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:13pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:12pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:10pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 6:56pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 6:36pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 6:12pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 5:24pm:

Sophia wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 5:20pm:

Carl D wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 3:33pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 3:25pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 2:37pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 2:24pm:

Lol

[url]https://s3.memeshappen.com/memes/They-said-I-could-be-anything-I-beca
me-a-PRETZEL-meme-55281.jpg[/url]

I'd bet that doesn't disgust you.

The fact that you twist yourself inside out in a pathetic attempt to justify your anti-science stance doesn't disgust me - it just amuses me.

"They don't report on side-effects".

Actually, they do - and that has now been proven.

"They don't report on the serious side-effects"

Nek minnit!

"They reported on a serious side-effect".

You can't make this stuff up Grin

Sure confuses the heck out of me.

Mind you, I have an excuse... I've just finished trudging through aquascoot's latest word salad and it's taking a while for me to recover from that. Roll Eyes

There’s nothing confusing to me about it… but then again I think differently… perhaps.
Both statements are correct. Given the correct timeline.
I see these statements as something summed up at the time and then at advancing times.
Hence changes….
For instance ….

"They don't report on the serious side-effects"

That’s exactly what was happening… in fact way back when test results were being conducted … that 75 year data withholding bs…. Yes… withholding real results ….
Like why? Something to hide maybe Huh

And then….

"They reported on a serious side-effect".

Yes… it’s eventually coming to surface… and there’s more in time to come….
It’s just the tip of the iceberg.

The serious side effects were being withheld… swept under the carpet…
That’s why there were none reported earlier.

PS: Some of the links trying to convince people of c-vax safety… from 2022 and 2021….
We are almost mid 2023 now.
News (and science) change tact.

And as if it couldn't be made more obvious that there is a political motive behind the under-reporting, ...

Lol

You literally posted a link a few hours ago from the BBC saying that someone died as a result of the vax.

"Under-reporting" ? FFS, you couldn't lie straight in bed.

No, those were your links, you nonce - all published 1 to 2 years ago.

No.

YOU posted a story from the BBC reporting a death.

FFS, you can't even remember something from a few hours ago.

YOU: "The irony is that a BBC reporter Lisa Shaw (44) died a week after receiving the AstraZeneca vaccine in May 2021. Her autopsy report from the coroner identifies the vaccine as the cause."

By the way, I'll give you 2 minutes to delete the "nonce" reference.

That was one comment on a report about one vaccine victim who was also a BBC reporter.

There are 75 complainants preparing to sue and at least 1500 people who are claiming injury from the vaccine. It's getting as bad as Thalidomide.

'The science', eh... Like it's a noun.

I gave you more than enough time to remove the reference to me as a "nonce".

I was more than fair.

It's up to the mods now.

What would you prefer? Twat?

Calling someone a paedophile/child molester in this forum results in a suspension.

I gave you a fair warning, and you ignored it.

Don't blame me for the consequences.

Back to top

IP Logged

MeisterEckhart

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 12515
Gender: male

Re: Elon Musk Slaughters BBC Reporter In Live Intervie
Reply #40 - Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:17pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:15pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:13pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:12pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:10pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 6:56pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 6:36pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 6:12pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 5:24pm:

Sophia wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 5:20pm:

Carl D wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 3:33pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 3:25pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 2:37pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 2:24pm:

Lol

[url]https://s3.memeshappen.com/memes/They-said-I-could-be-anything-I-beca
me-a-PRETZEL-meme-55281.jpg[/url]

I'd bet that doesn't disgust you.

The fact that you twist yourself inside out in a pathetic attempt to justify your anti-science stance doesn't disgust me - it just amuses me.

"They don't report on side-effects".

Actually, they do - and that has now been proven.

"They don't report on the serious side-effects"

Nek minnit!

"They reported on a serious side-effect".

You can't make this stuff up Grin

Sure confuses the heck out of me.

Mind you, I have an excuse... I've just finished trudging through aquascoot's latest word salad and it's taking a while for me to recover from that. Roll Eyes

There’s nothing confusing to me about it… but then again I think differently… perhaps.
Both statements are correct. Given the correct timeline.
I see these statements as something summed up at the time and then at advancing times.
Hence changes….
For instance ….

"They don't report on the serious side-effects"

That’s exactly what was happening… in fact way back when test results were being conducted … that 75 year data withholding bs…. Yes… withholding real results ….
Like why? Something to hide maybe Huh

And then….

"They reported on a serious side-effect".

Yes… it’s eventually coming to surface… and there’s more in time to come….
It’s just the tip of the iceberg.

The serious side effects were being withheld… swept under the carpet…
That’s why there were none reported earlier.

PS: Some of the links trying to convince people of c-vax safety… from 2022 and 2021….
We are almost mid 2023 now.
News (and science) change tact.

And as if it couldn't be made more obvious that there is a political motive behind the under-reporting, ...

Lol

You literally posted a link a few hours ago from the BBC saying that someone died as a result of the vax.

"Under-reporting" ? FFS, you couldn't lie straight in bed.

No, those were your links, you nonce - all published 1 to 2 years ago.

No.

YOU posted a story from the BBC reporting a death.

FFS, you can't even remember something from a few hours ago.

YOU: "The irony is that a BBC reporter Lisa Shaw (44) died a week after receiving the AstraZeneca vaccine in May 2021. Her autopsy report from the coroner identifies the vaccine as the cause."

By the way, I'll give you 2 minutes to delete the "nonce" reference.

That was one comment on a report about one vaccine victim who was also a BBC reporter.

There are 75 complainants preparing to sue and at least 1500 people who are claiming injury from the vaccine. It's getting as bad as Thalidomide.

'The science', eh... Like it's a noun.

I gave you more than enough time to remove the reference to me as a "nonce".

I was more than fair.

It's up to the mods now.

What would you prefer? Twat?

Calling someone a paedophile/child molester in this forum results in a suspension.

I gave you a fair warning, and you ignored it.

Don't blame me for the consequences.

Is that what nonce means to you, eh?

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 137758
Gender: male

Re: Elon Musk Slaughters BBC Reporter In Live Intervie
Reply #41 - Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:19pm

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:17pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:15pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:13pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:12pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:10pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 6:56pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 6:36pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 6:12pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 5:24pm:

Sophia wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 5:20pm:

Carl D wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 3:33pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 3:25pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 2:37pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 2:24pm:

Lol

[url]https://s3.memeshappen.com/memes/They-said-I-could-be-anything-I-beca
me-a-PRETZEL-meme-55281.jpg[/url]

I'd bet that doesn't disgust you.

The fact that you twist yourself inside out in a pathetic attempt to justify your anti-science stance doesn't disgust me - it just amuses me.

"They don't report on side-effects".

Actually, they do - and that has now been proven.

"They don't report on the serious side-effects"

Nek minnit!

"They reported on a serious side-effect".

You can't make this stuff up Grin

Sure confuses the heck out of me.

Mind you, I have an excuse... I've just finished trudging through aquascoot's latest word salad and it's taking a while for me to recover from that. Roll Eyes

There’s nothing confusing to me about it… but then again I think differently… perhaps.
Both statements are correct. Given the correct timeline.
I see these statements as something summed up at the time and then at advancing times.
Hence changes….
For instance ….

"They don't report on the serious side-effects"

That’s exactly what was happening… in fact way back when test results were being conducted … that 75 year data withholding bs…. Yes… withholding real results ….
Like why? Something to hide maybe Huh

And then….

"They reported on a serious side-effect".

Yes… it’s eventually coming to surface… and there’s more in time to come….
It’s just the tip of the iceberg.

The serious side effects were being withheld… swept under the carpet…
That’s why there were none reported earlier.

PS: Some of the links trying to convince people of c-vax safety… from 2022 and 2021….
We are almost mid 2023 now.
News (and science) change tact.

And as if it couldn't be made more obvious that there is a political motive behind the under-reporting, ...

Lol

You literally posted a link a few hours ago from the BBC saying that someone died as a result of the vax.

"Under-reporting" ? FFS, you couldn't lie straight in bed.

No, those were your links, you nonce - all published 1 to 2 years ago.

No.

YOU posted a story from the BBC reporting a death.

FFS, you can't even remember something from a few hours ago.

YOU: "The irony is that a BBC reporter Lisa Shaw (44) died a week after receiving the AstraZeneca vaccine in May 2021. Her autopsy report from the coroner identifies the vaccine as the cause."

By the way, I'll give you 2 minutes to delete the "nonce" reference.

That was one comment on a report about one vaccine victim who was also a BBC reporter.

There are 75 complainants preparing to sue and at least 1500 people who are claiming injury from the vaccine. It's getting as bad as Thalidomide.

'The science', eh... Like it's a noun.

I gave you more than enough time to remove the reference to me as a "nonce".

I was more than fair.

It's up to the mods now.

What would you prefer? Twat?

Calling someone a paedophile/child molester in this forum results in a suspension.

I gave you a fair warning, and you ignored it.

Don't blame me for the consequences.

Is that what nonce means to you, eh?

I gave you a fair warning.

"nonce 2. / (nɒns) / noun. prison slang a rapist or child molester; a sexual offender."

You'll probably receive a 48 hour suspension.

I suggest you use it to think about how you handle defeat - when you lose an argument, calling someone a child molester isn't the mature thing to do.

Friendly advice.

Back to top

IP Logged

MeisterEckhart

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 12515
Gender: male

Re: Elon Musk Slaughters BBC Reporter In Live Intervie
Reply #42 - Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:22pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:15pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:13pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:12pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:10pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 6:56pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 6:36pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 6:12pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 5:24pm:

Sophia wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 5:20pm:

Carl D wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 3:33pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 3:25pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 2:37pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 2:24pm:

Lol

[url]https://s3.memeshappen.com/memes/They-said-I-could-be-anything-I-beca
me-a-PRETZEL-meme-55281.jpg[/url]

I'd bet that doesn't disgust you.

The fact that you twist yourself inside out in a pathetic attempt to justify your anti-science stance doesn't disgust me - it just amuses me.

"They don't report on side-effects".

Actually, they do - and that has now been proven.

"They don't report on the serious side-effects"

Nek minnit!

"They reported on a serious side-effect".

You can't make this stuff up Grin

Sure confuses the heck out of me.

Mind you, I have an excuse... I've just finished trudging through aquascoot's latest word salad and it's taking a while for me to recover from that. Roll Eyes

There’s nothing confusing to me about it… but then again I think differently… perhaps.
Both statements are correct. Given the correct timeline.
I see these statements as something summed up at the time and then at advancing times.
Hence changes….
For instance ….

"They don't report on the serious side-effects"

That’s exactly what was happening… in fact way back when test results were being conducted … that 75 year data withholding bs…. Yes… withholding real results ….
Like why? Something to hide maybe Huh

And then….

"They reported on a serious side-effect".

Yes… it’s eventually coming to surface… and there’s more in time to come….
It’s just the tip of the iceberg.

The serious side effects were being withheld… swept under the carpet…
That’s why there were none reported earlier.

PS: Some of the links trying to convince people of c-vax safety… from 2022 and 2021….
We are almost mid 2023 now.
News (and science) change tact.

And as if it couldn't be made more obvious that there is a political motive behind the under-reporting, ...

Lol

You literally posted a link a few hours ago from the BBC saying that someone died as a result of the vax.

"Under-reporting" ? FFS, you couldn't lie straight in bed.

No, those were your links, you nonce - all published 1 to 2 years ago.

No.

YOU posted a story from the BBC reporting a death.

FFS, you can't even remember something from a few hours ago.

YOU: "The irony is that a BBC reporter Lisa Shaw (44) died a week after receiving the AstraZeneca vaccine in May 2021. Her autopsy report from the coroner identifies the vaccine as the cause."

By the way, I'll give you 2 minutes to delete the "nonce" reference.

That was one comment on a report about one vaccine victim who was also a BBC reporter.

There are 75 complainants preparing to sue and at least 1500 people who are claiming injury from the vaccine. It's getting as bad as Thalidomide.

'The science', eh... Like it's a noun.

I gave you more than enough time to remove the reference to me as a "nonce".

I was more than fair.

It's up to the mods now.

What would you prefer? Twat?

Calling someone a paedophile/child molester in this forum results in a suspension.

I gave you a fair warning, and you ignored it.

Don't blame me for the consequences.

You've made a fetish out of suggesting someone is a child rapist - sure you slap 'alleged' to it, but you make your point over and over again. Why is that, really?

Back to top

IP Logged

aquascoot

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 34748
Gender: male

Re: Elon Musk Slaughters BBC Reporter In Live Intervie
Reply #43 - Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:24pm

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:17pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:15pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:13pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:12pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:10pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 6:56pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 6:36pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 6:12pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 5:24pm:

Sophia wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 5:20pm:

Carl D wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 3:33pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 3:25pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 2:37pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 2:24pm:

Lol

[url]https://s3.memeshappen.com/memes/They-said-I-could-be-anything-I-beca
me-a-PRETZEL-meme-55281.jpg[/url]

I'd bet that doesn't disgust you.

The fact that you twist yourself inside out in a pathetic attempt to justify your anti-science stance doesn't disgust me - it just amuses me.

"They don't report on side-effects".

Actually, they do - and that has now been proven.

"They don't report on the serious side-effects"

Nek minnit!

"They reported on a serious side-effect".

You can't make this stuff up Grin

Sure confuses the heck out of me.

Mind you, I have an excuse... I've just finished trudging through aquascoot's latest word salad and it's taking a while for me to recover from that. Roll Eyes

There’s nothing confusing to me about it… but then again I think differently… perhaps.
Both statements are correct. Given the correct timeline.
I see these statements as something summed up at the time and then at advancing times.
Hence changes….
For instance ….

"They don't report on the serious side-effects"

That’s exactly what was happening… in fact way back when test results were being conducted … that 75 year data withholding bs…. Yes… withholding real results ….
Like why? Something to hide maybe Huh

And then….

"They reported on a serious side-effect".

Yes… it’s eventually coming to surface… and there’s more in time to come….
It’s just the tip of the iceberg.

The serious side effects were being withheld… swept under the carpet…
That’s why there were none reported earlier.

PS: Some of the links trying to convince people of c-vax safety… from 2022 and 2021….
We are almost mid 2023 now.
News (and science) change tact.

And as if it couldn't be made more obvious that there is a political motive behind the under-reporting, ...

Lol

You literally posted a link a few hours ago from the BBC saying that someone died as a result of the vax.

"Under-reporting" ? FFS, you couldn't lie straight in bed.

No, those were your links, you nonce - all published 1 to 2 years ago.

No.

YOU posted a story from the BBC reporting a death.

FFS, you can't even remember something from a few hours ago.

YOU: "The irony is that a BBC reporter Lisa Shaw (44) died a week after receiving the AstraZeneca vaccine in May 2021. Her autopsy report from the coroner identifies the vaccine as the cause."

By the way, I'll give you 2 minutes to delete the "nonce" reference.

That was one comment on a report about one vaccine victim who was also a BBC reporter.

There are 75 complainants preparing to sue and at least 1500 people who are claiming injury from the vaccine. It's getting as bad as Thalidomide.

'The science', eh... Like it's a noun.

I gave you more than enough time to remove the reference to me as a "nonce".

I was more than fair.

It's up to the mods now.

What would you prefer? Twat?

Calling someone a paedophile/child molester in this forum results in a suspension.

I gave you a fair warning, and you ignored it.

Don't blame me for the consequences.

Is that what nonce means to you, eh?

gweg has a Ph D in this area meister. he has studied it relentlessly.
it is always on his mind. Undecided

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 137758
Gender: male

Re: Elon Musk Slaughters BBC Reporter In Live Intervie
Reply #44 - Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:26pm

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:22pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:15pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:13pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:12pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:10pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 6:56pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 6:36pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 6:12pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 5:24pm:

Sophia wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 5:20pm:

Carl D wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 3:33pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 3:25pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 2:37pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 2:24pm:

Lol

[url]https://s3.memeshappen.com/memes/They-said-I-could-be-anything-I-beca
me-a-PRETZEL-meme-55281.jpg[/url]

I'd bet that doesn't disgust you.

The fact that you twist yourself inside out in a pathetic attempt to justify your anti-science stance doesn't disgust me - it just amuses me.

"They don't report on side-effects".

Actually, they do - and that has now been proven.

"They don't report on the serious side-effects"

Nek minnit!

"They reported on a serious side-effect".

You can't make this stuff up Grin

Sure confuses the heck out of me.

Mind you, I have an excuse... I've just finished trudging through aquascoot's latest word salad and it's taking a while for me to recover from that. Roll Eyes

There’s nothing confusing to me about it… but then again I think differently… perhaps.
Both statements are correct. Given the correct timeline.
I see these statements as something summed up at the time and then at advancing times.
Hence changes….
For instance ….

"They don't report on the serious side-effects"

That’s exactly what was happening… in fact way back when test results were being conducted … that 75 year data withholding bs…. Yes… withholding real results ….
Like why? Something to hide maybe Huh

And then….

"They reported on a serious side-effect".

Yes… it’s eventually coming to surface… and there’s more in time to come….
It’s just the tip of the iceberg.

The serious side effects were being withheld… swept under the carpet…
That’s why there were none reported earlier.

PS: Some of the links trying to convince people of c-vax safety… from 2022 and 2021….
We are almost mid 2023 now.
News (and science) change tact.

And as if it couldn't be made more obvious that there is a political motive behind the under-reporting, ...

Lol

You literally posted a link a few hours ago from the BBC saying that someone died as a result of the vax.

"Under-reporting" ? FFS, you couldn't lie straight in bed.

No, those were your links, you nonce - all published 1 to 2 years ago.

No.

YOU posted a story from the BBC reporting a death.

FFS, you can't even remember something from a few hours ago.

YOU: "The irony is that a BBC reporter Lisa Shaw (44) died a week after receiving the AstraZeneca vaccine in May 2021. Her autopsy report from the coroner identifies the vaccine as the cause."

By the way, I'll give you 2 minutes to delete the "nonce" reference.

That was one comment on a report about one vaccine victim who was also a BBC reporter.

There are 75 complainants preparing to sue and at least 1500 people who are claiming injury from the vaccine. It's getting as bad as Thalidomide.

'The science', eh... Like it's a noun.

I gave you more than enough time to remove the reference to me as a "nonce".

I was more than fair.

It's up to the mods now.

What would you prefer? Twat?

Calling someone a paedophile/child molester in this forum results in a suspension.

I gave you a fair warning, and you ignored it.

Don't blame me for the consequences.

You've made a fetish out of suggesting someone is a child rapist - sure you slap 'alleged' to it, but you make your point over and over again. Why is that, really?

I haven't suggested or alleged anything.

I've merely reported the facts:

Criminal defendant Donald J. Trump IS an alleged child rapist.

Back to top

IP Logged