Australian Politics Forum - Lying fuqqing 'political' Indigenous bitches.

MeisterEckhart

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 12829
Gender: male

Re: Lying fuqqing 'political' Indigenous bitches.
Reply #45 - Apr 19^th, 2023 at 7:01pm

John Smith wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 6:58pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 6:45pm:

Aussie wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 7:52am:

That will be for Government to determine. This is all tokenism, symbolism...whatever.

And when the 'Voice Commission' is dominated by 1/8 - 1/4 caste 'Aboriginal' Australians, arrogating to themselves the right to speak for all Aboriginal 'people', and whose accumulation of power and influence is capable of unduly influencing the Australian government and Parliament, ultimately perverting Australian democracy?

Then the govt, of the day can change the set up of 'the voice' so as to reflect expectations off the day.
This is why the referendum doesn't specify how the voice is to be set up. So as to give future governments flexibility . The only thing that will be set in stone is that there will be a voice, how that voice is to be presented is up to the government of the day.

And when the Voice is enshrined in the Constitution?

The point of its enshrinement in the constitution is to ensure it has a permanent and irrevocable influence on the Australian government of the day.

Back to top

IP Logged

Jasin Gold Member Offline Posts: 49058 Gender:	Re: Lying fuqqing 'political' Indigenous bitches. Reply #46 - Apr 19^th, 2023 at 7:02pm Did you get that from the back seat of Aussie's cab with your legs up Gay boy?
Back to top	AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY. IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 74862
Gender: male

Re: Lying fuqqing 'political' Indigenous bitches.
Reply #47 - Apr 19^th, 2023 at 7:03pm

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 7:01pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 6:58pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 6:45pm:

Aussie wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 7:52am:

That will be for Government to determine. This is all tokenism, symbolism...whatever.

And when the 'Voice Commission' is dominated by 1/8 - 1/4 caste 'Aboriginal' Australians, arrogating to themselves the right to speak for all Aboriginal 'people', and whose accumulation of power and influence is capable of unduly influencing the Australian government and Parliament, ultimately perverting Australian democracy?

Then the govt, of the day can change the set up of 'the voice' so as to reflect expectations off the day.
This is why the referendum doesn't specify how the voice is to be set up. So as to give future governments flexibility . The only thing that will be set in stone is that there will be a voice, how that voice is to be presented is up to the government of the day.

And when the Voice is enshrined in the Constitution?

The point of its enshrinement in the constitution is to ensure it has a permanent and irrevocable influence on the Australian government of the day.

The only thing that will be enshrined is that there is a voice . How that voice is represented to government is up to the government of the day

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

MeisterEckhart

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 12829
Gender: male

Re: Lying fuqqing 'political' Indigenous bitches.
Reply #48 - Apr 19^th, 2023 at 7:05pm

John Smith wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 7:03pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 7:01pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 6:58pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 6:45pm:

Aussie wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 7:52am:

That will be for Government to determine. This is all tokenism, symbolism...whatever.

And when the 'Voice Commission' is dominated by 1/8 - 1/4 caste 'Aboriginal' Australians, arrogating to themselves the right to speak for all Aboriginal 'people', and whose accumulation of power and influence is capable of unduly influencing the Australian government and Parliament, ultimately perverting Australian democracy?

Then the govt, of the day can change the set up of 'the voice' so as to reflect expectations off the day.
This is why the referendum doesn't specify how the voice is to be set up. So as to give future governments flexibility . The only thing that will be set in stone is that there will be a voice, how that voice is to be presented is up to the government of the day.

And when the Voice is enshrined in the Constitution?

The point of its enshrinement in the constitution is to ensure it has a permanent and irrevocable influence on the Australian government of the day.

The only thing that will be enshrined is that there is a voice . How that voice is represented to government is up to the government of the day

When it comes to enshrinement in the Constitution, 'voice' is elevated to a euphemism for power.

Back to top

IP Logged

Jasin Gold Member Offline Posts: 49058 Gender:	Re: Lying fuqqing 'political' Indigenous bitches. Reply #49 - Apr 19^th, 2023 at 7:20pm And the Voice said "You got flagon Gubba?"
Back to top	AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY. IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 47131
Gender: male

Re: Lying fuqqing 'political' Indigenous bitches.
Reply #50 - Apr 19^th, 2023 at 7:20pm

John Smith wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 7:03pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 7:01pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 6:58pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 6:45pm:

Aussie wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 7:52am:

That will be for Government to determine. This is all tokenism, symbolism...whatever.

And when the 'Voice Commission' is dominated by 1/8 - 1/4 caste 'Aboriginal' Australians, arrogating to themselves the right to speak for all Aboriginal 'people', and whose accumulation of power and influence is capable of unduly influencing the Australian government and Parliament, ultimately perverting Australian democracy?

Then the govt, of the day can change the set up of 'the voice' so as to reflect expectations off the day.
This is why the referendum doesn't specify how the voice is to be set up. So as to give future governments flexibility . The only thing that will be set in stone is that there will be a voice, how that voice is to be presented is up to the government of the day.

And when the Voice is enshrined in the Constitution?

The point of its enshrinement in the constitution is to ensure it has a permanent and irrevocable influence on the Australian government of the day.

The only thing that will be enshrined is that there is a voice . How that voice is represented to government is up to the government of the day

Silly dago bollocks, Short Planks.
If it's in the Constitution it's in the hands of unelected High Court justices.

Even a thick retarded idiot like you would know that.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 74862
Gender: male

Re: Lying fuqqing 'political' Indigenous bitches.
Reply #51 - Apr 19^th, 2023 at 8:02pm

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 7:05pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 7:03pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 7:01pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 6:58pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 6:45pm:

Aussie wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 7:52am:

That will be for Government to determine. This is all tokenism, symbolism...whatever.

And when the 'Voice Commission' is dominated by 1/8 - 1/4 caste 'Aboriginal' Australians, arrogating to themselves the right to speak for all Aboriginal 'people', and whose accumulation of power and influence is capable of unduly influencing the Australian government and Parliament, ultimately perverting Australian democracy?

Then the govt, of the day can change the set up of 'the voice' so as to reflect expectations off the day.
This is why the referendum doesn't specify how the voice is to be set up. So as to give future governments flexibility . The only thing that will be set in stone is that there will be a voice, how that voice is to be presented is up to the government of the day.

And when the Voice is enshrined in the Constitution?

The point of its enshrinement in the constitution is to ensure it has a permanent and irrevocable influence on the Australian government of the day.

The only thing that will be enshrined is that there is a voice . How that voice is represented to government is up to the government of the day

When it comes to enshrinement in the Constitution, 'voice' is elevated to a euphemism for power.

The Voice is advisory, how much power it has will depend on the government of the day.

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 74862
Gender: male

Re: Lying fuqqing 'political' Indigenous bitches.
Reply #52 - Apr 19^th, 2023 at 8:06pm

Frank wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 7:20pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 7:03pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 7:01pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 6:58pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 6:45pm:

Aussie wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 7:52am:

That will be for Government to determine. This is all tokenism, symbolism...whatever.

And when the 'Voice Commission' is dominated by 1/8 - 1/4 caste 'Aboriginal' Australians, arrogating to themselves the right to speak for all Aboriginal 'people', and whose accumulation of power and influence is capable of unduly influencing the Australian government and Parliament, ultimately perverting Australian democracy?

Then the govt, of the day can change the set up of 'the voice' so as to reflect expectations off the day.
This is why the referendum doesn't specify how the voice is to be set up. So as to give future governments flexibility . The only thing that will be set in stone is that there will be a voice, how that voice is to be presented is up to the government of the day.

And when the Voice is enshrined in the Constitution?

The point of its enshrinement in the constitution is to ensure it has a permanent and irrevocable influence on the Australian government of the day.

The only thing that will be enshrined is that there is a voice . How that voice is represented to government is up to the government of the day

Silly dago bollocks, Short Planks.
If it's in the Constitution it's in the hands of unelected High Court justices.

Even a thick retarded idiot like you would know that.

For someone who pretends to be educated, you really are an idiot.

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

MeisterEckhart

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 12829
Gender: male

Re: Lying fuqqing 'political' Indigenous bitches.
Reply #53 - Apr 19^th, 2023 at 8:29pm

John Smith wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 8:02pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 7:05pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 7:03pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 7:01pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 6:58pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 6:45pm:

Aussie wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 7:52am:

That will be for Government to determine. This is all tokenism, symbolism...whatever.

And when the 'Voice Commission' is dominated by 1/8 - 1/4 caste 'Aboriginal' Australians, arrogating to themselves the right to speak for all Aboriginal 'people', and whose accumulation of power and influence is capable of unduly influencing the Australian government and Parliament, ultimately perverting Australian democracy?

Then the govt, of the day can change the set up of 'the voice' so as to reflect expectations off the day.
This is why the referendum doesn't specify how the voice is to be set up. So as to give future governments flexibility . The only thing that will be set in stone is that there will be a voice, how that voice is to be presented is up to the government of the day.

And when the Voice is enshrined in the Constitution?

The point of its enshrinement in the constitution is to ensure it has a permanent and irrevocable influence on the Australian government of the day.

The only thing that will be enshrined is that there is a voice . How that voice is represented to government is up to the government of the day

When it comes to enshrinement in the Constitution, 'voice' is elevated to a euphemism for power.

The Voice is advisory, how much power it has will depend on the government of the day.

Frank is right on this one.

Once in the Constitution, the interpretation of 'advisory' and whether it translates into veto power over the government of the day will depend on the courts, not Parliament.

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38805
Gender: male

Re: Lying fuqqing 'political' Indigenous bitches.
Reply #54 - Apr 19^th, 2023 at 9:01pm

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 7:01pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 6:58pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 6:45pm:

Aussie wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 7:52am:

That will be for Government to determine. This is all tokenism, symbolism...whatever.

And when the 'Voice Commission' is dominated by 1/8 - 1/4 caste 'Aboriginal' Australians, arrogating to themselves the right to speak for all Aboriginal 'people', and whose accumulation of power and influence is capable of unduly influencing the Australian government and Parliament, ultimately perverting Australian democracy?

Then the govt, of the day can change the set up of 'the voice' so as to reflect expectations off the day.
This is why the referendum doesn't specify how the voice is to be set up. So as to give future governments flexibility . The only thing that will be set in stone is that there will be a voice, how that voice is to be presented is up to the government of the day.

And when the Voice is enshrined in the Constitution?

The point of its enshrinement in the constitution is to ensure it has a permanent and irrevocable influence on the Australian government of the day.

Rubbish. It gets as much 'influence' as the Government of the day wants to give it.

Back to top

IP Logged

MeisterEckhart

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 12829
Gender: male

Re: Lying fuqqing 'political' Indigenous bitches.
Reply #55 - Apr 19^th, 2023 at 9:19pm

Aussie wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 9:01pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 7:01pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 6:58pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 6:45pm:

Aussie wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 7:52am:

That will be for Government to determine. This is all tokenism, symbolism...whatever.

And when the 'Voice Commission' is dominated by 1/8 - 1/4 caste 'Aboriginal' Australians, arrogating to themselves the right to speak for all Aboriginal 'people', and whose accumulation of power and influence is capable of unduly influencing the Australian government and Parliament, ultimately perverting Australian democracy?

Then the govt, of the day can change the set up of 'the voice' so as to reflect expectations off the day.
This is why the referendum doesn't specify how the voice is to be set up. So as to give future governments flexibility . The only thing that will be set in stone is that there will be a voice, how that voice is to be presented is up to the government of the day.

And when the Voice is enshrined in the Constitution?

The point of its enshrinement in the constitution is to ensure it has a permanent and irrevocable influence on the Australian government of the day.

Rubbish. It gets as much 'influence' as the Government of the day wants to give it.

And when the government of the day disregards the 'Voice Commission', what then? Litigation? Sent to the High Court to determine whether the government of the day acted unconstitutionally?

Back to top

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 74862
Gender: male

Re: Lying fuqqing 'political' Indigenous bitches.
Reply #56 - Apr 19^th, 2023 at 9:27pm

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 9:19pm:

Aussie wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 9:01pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 7:01pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 6:58pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 6:45pm:

Aussie wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 7:52am:

That will be for Government to determine. This is all tokenism, symbolism...whatever.

And when the 'Voice Commission' is dominated by 1/8 - 1/4 caste 'Aboriginal' Australians, arrogating to themselves the right to speak for all Aboriginal 'people', and whose accumulation of power and influence is capable of unduly influencing the Australian government and Parliament, ultimately perverting Australian democracy?

Then the govt, of the day can change the set up of 'the voice' so as to reflect expectations off the day.
This is why the referendum doesn't specify how the voice is to be set up. So as to give future governments flexibility . The only thing that will be set in stone is that there will be a voice, how that voice is to be presented is up to the government of the day.

And when the Voice is enshrined in the Constitution?

The point of its enshrinement in the constitution is to ensure it has a permanent and irrevocable influence on the Australian government of the day.

Rubbish. It gets as much 'influence' as the Government of the day wants to give it.

And when the government of the day disregards the 'Voice Commission', what then? Litigation? Sent to the High Court to determine whether the government of the day acted unconstitutionally?

The constitution will only say that they have to have a voice, not that the government has to act on it. The government has said repeatedly that whether it acts on that advice or not will be up to them.

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

MeisterEckhart

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 12829
Gender: male

Re: Lying fuqqing 'political' Indigenous bitches.
Reply #57 - Apr 19^th, 2023 at 9:47pm

John Smith wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 9:27pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 9:19pm:

Aussie wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 9:01pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 7:01pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 6:58pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 6:45pm:

Aussie wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 7:52am:

That will be for Government to determine. This is all tokenism, symbolism...whatever.

And when the 'Voice Commission' is dominated by 1/8 - 1/4 caste 'Aboriginal' Australians, arrogating to themselves the right to speak for all Aboriginal 'people', and whose accumulation of power and influence is capable of unduly influencing the Australian government and Parliament, ultimately perverting Australian democracy?

Then the govt, of the day can change the set up of 'the voice' so as to reflect expectations off the day.
This is why the referendum doesn't specify how the voice is to be set up. So as to give future governments flexibility . The only thing that will be set in stone is that there will be a voice, how that voice is to be presented is up to the government of the day.

And when the Voice is enshrined in the Constitution?

The point of its enshrinement in the constitution is to ensure it has a permanent and irrevocable influence on the Australian government of the day.

Rubbish. It gets as much 'influence' as the Government of the day wants to give it.

And when the government of the day disregards the 'Voice Commission', what then? Litigation? Sent to the High Court to determine whether the government of the day acted unconstitutionally?

The constitution will only say that they have to have a voice, not that the government has to act on it. The government has said repeatedly that whether it acts on that advice or not will be up to them.

What is the point of a constitutional voice if it doesn't translate into power?

A constitutional body that is subsequently disregarded by the government of the day will have socio-political consequences that will lead to litigation.

The voice is predicated on the lie of aboriginal unity and is promoted by people with less claim to aboriginal descent than many descendants of immigrants have to their ancestors' homeland.

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 47131
Gender: male

Re: Lying fuqqing 'political' Indigenous bitches.
Reply #58 - Apr 19^th, 2023 at 10:16pm

John Smith wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 9:27pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 9:19pm:

Aussie wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 9:01pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 7:01pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 6:58pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 6:45pm:

Aussie wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 7:52am:

That will be for Government to determine. This is all tokenism, symbolism...whatever.

And when the 'Voice Commission' is dominated by 1/8 - 1/4 caste 'Aboriginal' Australians, arrogating to themselves the right to speak for all Aboriginal 'people', and whose accumulation of power and influence is capable of unduly influencing the Australian government and Parliament, ultimately perverting Australian democracy?

Then the govt, of the day can change the set up of 'the voice' so as to reflect expectations off the day.
This is why the referendum doesn't specify how the voice is to be set up. So as to give future governments flexibility . The only thing that will be set in stone is that there will be a voice, how that voice is to be presented is up to the government of the day.

And when the Voice is enshrined in the Constitution?

The point of its enshrinement in the constitution is to ensure it has a permanent and irrevocable influence on the Australian government of the day.

Rubbish. It gets as much 'influence' as the Government of the day wants to give it.

And when the government of the day disregards the 'Voice Commission', what then? Litigation? Sent to the High Court to determine whether the government of the day acted unconstitutionally?

The constitution will only say that they have to have a voice, not that the government has to act on it. The government has said repeatedly that whether it acts on that advice or not will be up to them.

So what IS the frikken point?

There are hundreds of lobby groups that can be listened to or ignored.

What IS the point of putting a lobby group into the constitution if it can be safely ignored?.
What's the fkkkking point of it all?

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38805
Gender: male

Re: Lying fuqqing 'political' Indigenous bitches.
Reply #59 - Apr 20^th, 2023 at 8:44am

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 19^th, 2023 at 9:47pm: