greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 21
st, 2023 at 10:26am:
If true, why do you think that is?
One of the most obvious should be: who will be appointed to a 'voice committee'?
People whose claim to Aboriginal ancestry is up to 8 times less than their claim to, say, British/other European ancestry? They will then claim the right to speak for the (non-existent) 'aboriginal people'.
And what will be their demands? Money and power.
No one can claim to have better answers to the irreconcilable and vast sociocultural differences between Aboriginal peoples, those peoples, and other peoples of Australia than can be delivered via legislation.
The 'voice' is a cynically puerile answer that attempts to satisfy the socially and politically naive.
I'd bet even Labour want the Yes vote to fail.