greggerypeccary wrote on May 4
th, 2023 at 3:05pm:
Aussie wrote on May 4
th, 2023 at 2:47pm:
UnSubRocky wrote on Apr 29
th, 2023 at 8:38pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 29
th, 2023 at 7:28pm:
UnSubRocky wrote on Apr 29
th, 2023 at 7:26pm:
It won't. There have to be strong extenuating circumstances for an accused rapist to be convicted of rape from what was alleged 30 years ago.
It's a civil case, not a criminal case.
It's very likely he will lose the case, and will forever be known as a rapist.
As well as being known as an alleged child rapist.
Unless he is idiotic enough to admit to raping some woman, he won't lose.
How much you wanna bet?
I'll get in on that too.
Looks like criminal defendant Trump is going down for this one.
Refusing to appear in court, and instead flying off to Scotland, is pretty much a confession.
The thaing is....in the USA there is no doubt. If a Defendant (like Humpty) in a civil case (like this one is) fails to give or call evidence in rebuttal of the allegations made under oath by the Plaintiffs and their witnesses (as is the case here) the Jury (and there is one in this case) is entitled to draw an inference adverse to Humpty that there is no witness who can rebut the allegations of the Plaintiff, including Humpty himself.
In other words, the Jury is entitled to conclude that because Humpty did not give evidence, if he did, it would not in any way detract from what E. Jean Carroll has testified under oath to.
Humpty is well and truly fuqqed.
*The comments up there ^^^^^ about Humpty's remarks on social media about no scream etc etc is not an indication he knew anything, or was there himself, or is a confession. He was repeating what E. Jean Carroll had made public herself....she said she did not scream etc...and Humpty ran with that.....publicly. That is a nothing burger.*
Humpty is well and truly...fuqqed.