Diversity is a strength, as they say, and aren’t we to rejoice that a New Australian has settled in so comfortably and with such confidence?Extracts from a letter Greens senator Mehreen Faruqi’s lawyer sent to The Australian on July 11
The Cartoon is patently racist, by design and effect. It adopts racist stereotypes of Muslims and women of colour, with the self-evident intention of vilifying Senator Faruqi because of her race, colour and religion. It is gratuitous and it is likely to incite hatred towards her.
The Cartoon’s publication has caused, and is likely to cause, ongoing serious harm to Senator Faruqi by associating her with a listed terrorist organisation and by suggesting that she is attempting to cover up the truth. This, in turn, calls into question her integrity, honesty, values, and fitness for office in the Australian parliament. It would obviously be untenable for a person who supported a listed terrorist organisation to sit in the Australian parliament.
The Cartoon has the potential to harm Senator Faruqi’s reputation in the future by causing Australians not to vote in her favour in the next Senate election, because they think that she is affiliated with a terrorist organisation. It is important to Senator Faruqi to have a reputation as a trustworthy, honest and decent politician, both because these characteristics matter to her personally and because a reputation of this kind would assist her to retain her Senate position. To which The Australian‘s lawyers replied (extract)
Our client is surprised and bemused that your client is threatening legal action given her comments can only be understood to mean that the barbaric Hamas regime, a listed terrorist group and the perpetrators of the October 7 atrocity, has some legitimacy if it is supported by the Palestinian people.
Your client is a sitting Senator and deputy leader of a major political party. She has positioned herself as a spokesperson on issues relating to the Israel / Palestine conflict. She has wilfully put herself at the centre of debate on these issues and she has courted media attention in order to engage in that debate.
Your client must be aware that her views are controversial and that they will elicit strong responses from people and organisations who hold opposing views.
In any event, our client has unimpeachable defences to the publication of the cartoon your client complains about.
The fact is, your client willingly participated in an interview on a national political program to answer questions about the Israel / Palestine conflict. She was plainly prepared to answer questions on that topic. During the interview she agreed that Hamas should remain a designated terrorist organisation in Australia. Despite that, she refused to categorically condemn Hamas and say that it should be dismantled.
Your client purports to advocate for free speech, yet herself is now using her status and position as an Australian Senator in order to stifle public discussion she doesn't like. “The mere fact she got her nose out of joint about it means that
her impulse is to cry racism and ring the lawyers – that’s the new game,” Leak says.