Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
The IPCC and the models (Read 106 times)
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17277
Gender: male
The IPCC and the models
May 5th, 2023 at 3:22pm
 
Quote:
A n average rate o f increase o f g l o b a l m e a n temperature during the next century of about 0.3°C per decade (with an uncertainty range of 0 . 2 — 0 . 5 ° C per decade) assuming the I P C C Scenario A (Business-as-
Usual) emissions of greenhouse gases; this is a more rapid increase than seen over the past 10,000 years.


https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/05/ipcc_90_92_assessments_far_overv...

UAH has warming at 0.18 per decade. REMSS has 0.21 per decade.

And then there was STAR from NOAA -

Quote:
In the end the two series were similar but RSS has consistently exhibited more warming than UAH.  Then a little more than a decade ago, the group at NOAA headed by Zou produced a new data product called STAR (Satellite Applications and Research). They used the same underlying microwave retrievals but produced a temperature record showing much more warming than either UAH or RSS, as well as all the weather balloon records. It came close to validating the climate models, although in my paper with Christy we included the STAR data in the satellite average and the models still ran too hot. Nonetheless it was possible to point to the coolest of the models and compare them to the STAR data and find a match, which was a lifeline for those arguing that climate models are within the uncertainty range of the data.

Until now. In their new paper Zou and his co-authors rebuilt the STAR series based on a new empirical method for removing time-of-day observation drift and a more stable method of merging satellite records. Now STAR agrees with the UAH series very closely — in fact it has a slightly smaller warming trend. The old STAR series had a mid-troposphere warming trend of 0.16 degrees Celsius per decade, but it’s now 0.09 degrees per decade, compared to 0.1 in UAH and 0.14 in RSS. For the troposphere as a whole they estimate a warming trend of 0.14 C/decade.


So the IPCC's models are way wrong.

CMIP6 calculates the increase at 0.39C per decade. Going up? Roll Eyes

...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17277
Gender: male
Re: The IPCC and the models
Reply #1 - May 12th, 2023 at 3:13pm
 
...

Posted recently. Amid the claim of science denial. Listed Global Warming Hoax.

NOTE: It doesn't say anything about AGW. Merely that the globe has warmed. Fancy that coming out of the Little Ice Age… Where there were crop failures, starvation and pestilence.


Seems someone jumped the shark. Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Moderator
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 102827
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: The IPCC and the models
Reply #2 - May 12th, 2023 at 3:21pm
 
I remind Monk that the author is a comedian.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abbie_Richards

Quote:
Comedy career

After graduating from Colorado College,
Richards moved to Melbourne to work in standup comedy.




...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print