Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on May 22^nd, 2024 at 1:18pm:


Goebbels was promoting an ideology, I'm promoting universal well-being and security. Spot the difference?


Quote:


I didn't say anything about transgenderism.

You like  "facts" and "evidence" - as in Adam's remark?

ROTFL. 

Quote:


Disastrously, but finally getting around to implementing UN res 242, after all the obfuscation and hindering by Israel, backed by the looney conservative  Christian Right in the US. (eg, with  Pompeo calling for Armegeddon and "the rapture", during the  Trump administration, to hasten the 2nd coming of Christ)

"Of the 81 women killed in domestic violence incidents in the NT since 2000, 76 were from First Nations communities."

https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/australia/nt-coroner-nearing-the-end-of-domestic-...

I'm guessing she just wouldn't listen, ay?

Zo - vat iss zis 'ideology' of promoting universal well-being?

When such a motherhood statement is disguising the intention of putting in control a specified small group, you are promoting an ideology of rule by minority, and history tells us clearly where that leads.

It is simply NOT possible to 'promote universal well-being'  for those who do not 'know the ropes' and/or who do not wish to co-operate in their own salvation, and the course of handing total power to a select group to impose this is fraught with danger - that danger being the total loss of sovereignty of individual and community to self-appointed 'elite' group - such as has been occurring in Australia now for decades.

On a worldwide scale - the amazing presumption is that handing over all national sovereignty to a blatantly corrupt and biased body - the UN - will suddenly solve all problems.  Again, history shows us that will never be the case.

Nobody in his/her right mind would consider such foolishness with regard to a body that condemns the victim for being attacked and its citizens brutally murdered.

Note:-  Israel has UNDER-played its hand in pursuit of the ideal of not killing innocent civilians... and thus allowed a delay that enabled 'world opinion' manipulated by liars to turn against the victim of a vile series of crimes.  Should've gone for the kill from the start and now the world media would have forgotten about the whole thing.. no headlines in it...

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on May 22^nd, 2024 at 3:45pm:


Did you miss it?

The "ideology" of the UNUDHR, presently defenceless in our current vicious 'individual sovereignty'  neanderthal ideology ruling the world.

Quote:
 

I admire your brave attempt to bring "logic" to your argument.

But your error in logic there: international law is not rule by (an ideologically-driven) minority, it is rule by.....law.

The issue is the nature of the law, see the articles defined in the UNUDHR.   

Quote:


International law is certainly a work in progress, but don't make the mistake of rejecting it on 'individual sovereignty'  ideological grounds just because previous atempts to ensure the wellbeing of the collective have failed.

Quote:


Not if the 'select group' is imbued with the principles of the UNUDHR, rather than to exclusive ideologies held by different groups.

Quote:


All the result of confusion over matters of 'sovereignty' for different groups, and a battle - driven by self-interest - over public versus private control of the means of production and distribution.

Quote:
 

Never say never; the problems in the UN are due to confusion over the issues of 'sovereignty'  - which currently renders null and void the effectiveness of international law. 

Quote:


Now you are just showing your ideological blindness: the UN wanted to create two states living in peace, but only recognised one of them.

Quote:


Now you are showing your contempt for life, and the international law required to protect life,  given murderousness of tribal instincts.

Quote:


Reality check: if the IDF had murdered the entire Gazan population ..."gone for the kill", the world media would NOT have forgotten by now, because the issue of the occupation of the WB would be even more pressing than it is now.   

"international law is not rule " .....

Fixed for ya....  YOU drink it ...........

thegreatdivide wrote on May 24^th, 2024 at 7:04pm:


You do realise you're talking with someone whose preference it is to widen the gap, not close it?

SadKangaroo wrote on May 25^th, 2024 at 7:55am:


Yes, for graps it's all a matter of 'personal responsibility', he denies the reality of entrenched/systemic socio-economic  disadvantage which CAN be eradicated by the state; entrenched poverty is a political choice of the government, not an economic necessity.


But denial, or concealing the consequences of entrenched poverty eg high crime and DV rates, won't assist in closing the gap.