John Smith
|
Aussie wrote on May 21 st, 2023 at 7:39pm: John Smith wrote on May 21 st, 2023 at 7:33pm: Aussie wrote on May 21 st, 2023 at 7:29pm: John Smith wrote on May 21 st, 2023 at 7:21pm: Aussie wrote on May 21 st, 2023 at 7:17pm: John Smith wrote on May 21 st, 2023 at 7:13pm: Setanta wrote on May 21 st, 2023 at 7:11pm: John Smith wrote on May 21 st, 2023 at 7:04pm: Setanta wrote on May 21 st, 2023 at 5:44pm: John Smith wrote on May 21 st, 2023 at 5:38pm: Jovial Monk wrote on May 21 st, 2023 at 5:30pm: I am still waiting for Booby to explain WHY he cross-posted my mother’s death notice WITH NO REFERENCE TO ME. Be nice to actually got a manful, sincere apology. Doubt Booby does manful or sincere or apologise. Another example of fd turning a blind eye to doxing. Monk himself states there was no reference to him, who was doxed? Was the death notice a public notice? Crap. The whole thread was that Monk's mum had died. Death notice wasn't public, he copied it from Monk's site Where it was it publicly available? On the front page, perhaps? So I can post stuff publicly available about you and your family? You sure can....if he has posted it publicly. Not if he hasn't posted it publicly on Ozpol dumarse Do not post personal information about other members without their explicit permission. This includes the contents of personal messages and emails, photos, names, IP addresses, phone numbers, locations etc. This includes information that can be found online and instructions on how to find information about specific members. Such behaviour is considered stalking. 'Found on line' does not mean 'found on a Forum Monk advertises here at OzPol.' Great, show me the new definition of online. I missed that update. You're pathetic, crying for a decade over doxing now twisting yourself in knots trying to defend it. Res ipsa loquitur, Mr Smith. If Bobby transgressed the rule by repeating what Monk posted at his own Forum which he brazenly advertises here, he would have been banned. One plus one = two. Monk does not get to eat his cake and have it. The Rule obviously has been given a broad interpretation according to the outcomes. Eat it. Interpretation? What a load of bollocks. And I don't give a sh it what the outcome is. Fd and The mods on this site allow and encourage doxing. No pretending the definition of online has changed can change that
|