Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Send Topic Print
Stolen Generations say Australia doesn't accept it (Read 1724 times)
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 40938
Re: Stolen Generations say Australia doesn't accept it
Reply #15 - May 27th, 2023 at 2:14pm
 
UnSubRocky wrote on May 27th, 2023 at 9:44am:
Brian Ross wrote on May 26th, 2023 at 5:56pm:
UnSubRocky wrote on May 26th, 2023 at 4:02pm:
Yeah, we do. White people won. Then it was up to white people to either save or ignore indigenous Australians from their own peril. The white people chose. Many indigenous people are whingeing about getting something for nothing. They are always free to live a traditional livelihood on one of the reservations that make up about 15% of Australia.


No they weren't.  The Police sought them out and took them from their parents, Unsub.  They were usually removed from camps and homes. They broke the hearts of the parents and the kids and prevented them ever meeting again. Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


Authorities took the indigenous children (with caucasian heritage) from the parents of those that could not look after their children. Full-blooded indigenous children would probably have been ignored for a long time.


Which makes the excuse they were removed because of cirumstance just that an excuse, Unsub.  Full blood kids were ignored and left to the designs (supposedly) of the Indigenous parents which were exactly the same as were the half-blood kids.  You have to eventually face the facts, these kids were removed without permission by the Police and other authorities.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 83822
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: Stolen Generations say Australia doesn't accept it
Reply #16 - May 27th, 2023 at 2:15pm
 
Right on cue as the voice fails .... bring on the harps and cellos...

Back to top
 

violin.png (146 KB | 8 )
violin.png

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Gnads
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 29288
Gender: male
Re: Stolen Generations say Australia doesn't accept it
Reply #17 - May 28th, 2023 at 10:04am
 
Brian Ross wrote on May 26th, 2023 at 8:55pm:
Gnads wrote on May 26th, 2023 at 6:06pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 26th, 2023 at 5:59pm:
Yet they complain all the time.  They were mistreated, raped and prevented from seeing their parents ever again.  The authorities could have provided them but as they were regarded as non-citizens they were treated like fauna.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


The same happened to white children made wards of the state.


Being a white child, removed to become "wards of the state" was very different compared to an Indigenous child who suffered the same fate.  The Indigenous children were denied any contact with their families, they were denied their culture, their religion, their essence of whom they were, where as that was not denied to White kids.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Quote:
And yes many of them were removed from homes because of neglect & poverty issues including not being able to support or sustain children.

Where's your empathy for them?


I have considerable empathy for them, where is your's you hard hearted old man?

Quote:
Were they not affected & traumatised because of what happened to them?

Why is it that it only matters if you were Aboriginal?


Indigenous kids were treated far worse than White kids.  Which would you have preferred to be, considering how you treat Indigenous people with your Racist attitudes.   Tsk, tsk, tsk...  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Quote:
Piss off you sanctimonious old cockroll.


Ad huminem insults ignored and treated with the contempt they deserve, Gnads.  They merely demonstrate your playground mentality.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes



Rubbish ... you patronising old fool. You definitely are a big part of the problem in always making it about race & having more excuses that Aboriginals should & have to be treated differently to any other Australian.

After "race" was removed from the Constitution in 1967.......dumbphucks like you & the Albanese Govt. want to re-insert "race" back into it.

Complete idiots.
Back to top
 

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 40938
Re: Stolen Generations say Australia doesn't accept it
Reply #18 - May 28th, 2023 at 1:56pm
 
Gnads wrote on May 28th, 2023 at 10:04am:
Brian Ross wrote on May 26th, 2023 at 8:55pm:
Gnads wrote on May 26th, 2023 at 6:06pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 26th, 2023 at 5:59pm:
Yet they complain all the time.  They were mistreated, raped and prevented from seeing their parents ever again.  The authorities could have provided them but as they were regarded as non-citizens they were treated like fauna.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


The same happened to white children made wards of the state.


Being a white child, removed to become "wards of the state" was very different compared to an Indigenous child who suffered the same fate.  The Indigenous children were denied any contact with their families, they were denied their culture, their religion, their essence of whom they were, where as that was not denied to White kids.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Quote:
And yes many of them were removed from homes because of neglect & poverty issues including not being able to support or sustain children.

Where's your empathy for them?


I have considerable empathy for them, where is your's you hard hearted old man?

Quote:
Were they not affected & traumatised because of what happened to them?

Why is it that it only matters if you were Aboriginal?


Indigenous kids were treated far worse than White kids.  Which would you have preferred to be, considering how you treat Indigenous people with your Racist attitudes.   Tsk, tsk, tsk...  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Quote:
Piss off you sanctimonious old cockroll.


Ad huminem insults ignored and treated with the contempt they deserve, Gnads.  They merely demonstrate your playground mentality.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes



Rubbish ... you patronising old fool. You definitely are a big part of the problem in always making it about race & having more excuses that Aboriginals should & have to be treated differently to any other Australian.

After "race" was removed from the Constitution in 1967.......dumbphucks like you & the Albanese Govt. want to re-insert "race" back into it.

Complete idiots.


"Race" wasn't removed from the Constitution in 1967.  It is still there.  When did you ever read the Australian Constitution?  I bet never.  Section III(XXV) still holds:

Quote:
25. Provisions as to races disqualified from voting

For the purposes of the last section, if by the law of any State all persons of any race are disqualified from voting at elections for the more numerous House of the Parliament of the State, then, in reckoning the number of the people of the State or of the Commonwealth, persons of that race resident in that State shall not be counted.

[Source]

What happened in 1967 was a change to the clause that stated the Commonwealth was to have no power over Indigenous Australians to have power over them:

Quote:
Section 51 (xxvi) was amended by the Constitution Alteration (Aboriginals) 1967, and previously read as follows:

"(xxvi) the people of any race, other than the aboriginal race in any State, for whom it is deemed necessary to make special laws;"


It now reads:

Quote:
Section 51 (xxvi)  the people of any race for whom it is deemed necessary to make special laws;

[Source]

Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 83822
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: Stolen Generations say Australia doesn't accept it
Reply #19 - May 28th, 2023 at 2:40pm
 
The only solution is the Aborassic Park Homeland and Gondwanamo Bay for the dissidents, terrorists and recalcitrants.

Only by a true separation and enforced boundaries will the two nations in one ever peacefully co-exist.

Out of sight - out of mind .... no social security, no nothing, no special healthcare and flying doctor flights etc, instead of sucking the blood out of royalties they can negotiate their own deals with the international parasites without Big Mama Government standing there to ensure fair play, no costs for prisons and extra policing needed to control their actions, the comancheros can run booze into The Res by the semi-load to help them on The Road to Extinction.

Let them do things their way with a goanna skin and a stick.... think how much of a saving on the economy and budget.... how many billions extra for hospitals, roads, infrastructure and so forth...
Back to top
« Last Edit: May 28th, 2023 at 2:46pm by Grappler Truth Teller Feller »  

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Gnads
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 29288
Gender: male
Re: Stolen Generations say Australia doesn't accept it
Reply #20 - May 28th, 2023 at 2:44pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on May 28th, 2023 at 1:56pm:
Gnads wrote on May 28th, 2023 at 10:04am:
Brian Ross wrote on May 26th, 2023 at 8:55pm:
Gnads wrote on May 26th, 2023 at 6:06pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 26th, 2023 at 5:59pm:
Yet they complain all the time.  They were mistreated, raped and prevented from seeing their parents ever again.  The authorities could have provided them but as they were regarded as non-citizens they were treated like fauna.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


The same happened to white children made wards of the state.


Being a white child, removed to become "wards of the state" was very different compared to an Indigenous child who suffered the same fate.  The Indigenous children were denied any contact with their families, they were denied their culture, their religion, their essence of whom they were, where as that was not denied to White kids.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Quote:
And yes many of them were removed from homes because of neglect & poverty issues including not being able to support or sustain children.

Where's your empathy for them?


I have considerable empathy for them, where is your's you hard hearted old man?

Quote:
Were they not affected & traumatised because of what happened to them?

Why is it that it only matters if you were Aboriginal?


Indigenous kids were treated far worse than White kids.  Which would you have preferred to be, considering how you treat Indigenous people with your Racist attitudes.   Tsk, tsk, tsk...  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Quote:
Piss off you sanctimonious old cockroll.


Ad huminem insults ignored and treated with the contempt they deserve, Gnads.  They merely demonstrate your playground mentality.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes



Rubbish ... you patronising old fool. You definitely are a big part of the problem in always making it about race & having more excuses that Aboriginals should & have to be treated differently to any other Australian.

After "race" was removed from the Constitution in 1967.......dumbphucks like you & the Albanese Govt. want to re-insert "race" back into it.

Complete idiots.


"Race" wasn't removed from the Constitution in 1967.  It is still there.  When did you ever read the Australian Constitution?  I bet never.  Section III(XXV) still holds:

Quote:
25. Provisions as to races disqualified from voting

For the purposes of the last section, if by the law of any State all persons of any race are disqualified from voting at elections for the more numerous House of the Parliament of the State, then, in reckoning the number of the people of the State or of the Commonwealth, persons of that race resident in that State shall not be counted.

[Source]

What happened in 1967 was a change to the clause that stated the Commonwealth was to have no power over Indigenous Australians to have power over them:

Quote:
Section 51 (xxvi) was amended by the Constitution Alteration (Aboriginals) 1967, and previously read as follows:

"(xxvi) the people of any race, other than the aboriginal race in any State, for whom it is deemed necessary to make special laws;"


It now reads:

Quote:
Section 51 (xxvi)  the people of any race for whom it is deemed necessary to make special laws;

[Source]



It doesn't mention any specific race......it applies to all races

now you want a specific race to have a specific section applicable only to them enshrined back into the Constitution.

That's racist/exclusionary & divisive.

I stand by what I said about you.
Back to top
 

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 40938
Re: Stolen Generations say Australia doesn't accept it
Reply #21 - May 28th, 2023 at 2:54pm
 
Gnads wrote on May 28th, 2023 at 2:44pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 28th, 2023 at 1:56pm:
Gnads wrote on May 28th, 2023 at 10:04am:
After "race" was removed from the Constitution in 1967.......dumbphucks like you & the Albanese Govt. want to re-insert "race" back into it.

Complete idiots.


"Race" wasn't removed from the Constitution in 1967.  It is still there.  When did you ever read the Australian Constitution?  I bet never.  Section III(XXV) still holds:

Quote:
25. Provisions as to races disqualified from voting

For the purposes of the last section, if by the law of any State all persons of any race are disqualified from voting at elections for the more numerous House of the Parliament of the State, then, in reckoning the number of the people of the State or of the Commonwealth, persons of that race resident in that State shall not be counted.

[Source]

What happened in 1967 was a change to the clause that stated the Commonwealth was to have no power over Indigenous Australians to have power over them:

Quote:
Section 51 (xxvi) was amended by the Constitution Alteration (Aboriginals) 1967, and previously read as follows:

"(xxvi) the people of any race, other than the aboriginal race in any State, for whom it is deemed necessary to make special laws;"


It now reads:

Quote:
Section 51 (xxvi)  the people of any race for whom it is deemed necessary to make special laws;

[Source]



It doesn't mention any specific race......it applies to all races

now you want a specific race to have a specific section applicable only to them enshrined back into the Constitution.

That's racist/exclusionary & divisive.

I stand by what I said about you.


You stated that the concept of "Race" had been removed from the Constitution, I proved that it had not.  Admit your error.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 83822
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: Stolen Generations say Australia doesn't accept it
Reply #22 - May 28th, 2023 at 3:32pm
 
Special laws could be favourable to that 'race' ...  affirmative action in the PS etc has already done that for ethnics as race groups  (now look at the joint) - funny how people cry 'principle' over one POV they disagree with, and then throw it out the window when it comes to their favourite one...
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 40938
Re: Stolen Generations say Australia doesn't accept it
Reply #23 - May 28th, 2023 at 7:51pm
 
Gnads wrote on May 28th, 2023 at 2:44pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 28th, 2023 at 1:56pm:
Gnads wrote on May 28th, 2023 at 10:04am:
Brian Ross wrote on May 26th, 2023 at 8:55pm:
Gnads wrote on May 26th, 2023 at 6:06pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 26th, 2023 at 5:59pm:
Yet they complain all the time.  They were mistreated, raped and prevented from seeing their parents ever again.  The authorities could have provided them but as they were regarded as non-citizens they were treated like fauna.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


The same happened to white children made wards of the state.


Being a white child, removed to become "wards of the state" was very different compared to an Indigenous child who suffered the same fate.  The Indigenous children were denied any contact with their families, they were denied their culture, their religion, their essence of whom they were, where as that was not denied to White kids.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Quote:
And yes many of them were removed from homes because of neglect & poverty issues including not being able to support or sustain children.

Where's your empathy for them?


I have considerable empathy for them, where is your's you hard hearted old man?

Quote:
Were they not affected & traumatised because of what happened to them?

Why is it that it only matters if you were Aboriginal?


Indigenous kids were treated far worse than White kids.  Which would you have preferred to be, considering how you treat Indigenous people with your Racist attitudes.   Tsk, tsk, tsk...  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Quote:
Piss off you sanctimonious old cockroll.


Ad huminem insults ignored and treated with the contempt they deserve, Gnads.  They merely demonstrate your playground mentality.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes



Rubbish ... you patronising old fool. You definitely are a big part of the problem in always making it about race & having more excuses that Aboriginals should & have to be treated differently to any other Australian.

After "race" was removed from the Constitution in 1967.......dumbphucks like you & the Albanese Govt. want to re-insert "race" back into it.

Complete idiots.


"Race" wasn't removed from the Constitution in 1967.  It is still there.  When did you ever read the Australian Constitution?  I bet never.  Section III(XXV) still holds:

Quote:
25. Provisions as to races disqualified from voting

For the purposes of the last section, if by the law of any State all persons of any race are disqualified from voting at elections for the more numerous House of the Parliament of the State, then, in reckoning the number of the people of the State or of the Commonwealth, persons of that race resident in that State shall not be counted.

[Source]

What happened in 1967 was a change to the clause that stated the Commonwealth was to have no power over Indigenous Australians to have power over them:

Quote:
Section 51 (xxvi) was amended by the Constitution Alteration (Aboriginals) 1967, and previously read as follows:

"(xxvi) the people of any race, other than the aboriginal race in any State, for whom it is deemed necessary to make special laws;"


It now reads:

Quote:
Section 51 (xxvi)  the people of any race for whom it is deemed necessary to make special laws;

[Source]



It doesn't mention any specific race......it applies to all races


Which means there is still provision "on the issue of Race", now doesn't it?

Quote:
now you want a specific race to have a specific section applicable only to them enshrined back into the Constitution.


How do you know what I want?  I haven't expressed an opinion. It is, after all, a secret ballot, and one which should not be revealed to Racists like you.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Quote:
That's racist/exclusionary & divisive.

I stand by what I said about you.


And I stand by what I have said about you, too.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 83822
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: Stolen Generations say Australia doesn't accept it
Reply #24 - May 28th, 2023 at 8:39pm
 
Well - they would, wouldn't they?  If they claim pain on pain for generations, then King Albo, in his Madness, might give them another handout...

They need to Get Over It!!

https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/australia/at-what-cost-nathan-maynard-explores-th...

My theatre - one of the many 'owners' who never get a cent.. play about identifying as an Aborigine - clearly the benefits are flowing in as we speak and the sorts of entrepreneurs like Pascoe can see billions just over the horizon.  Says he's been accepted by the Yuin - never heard that one.... his Cornish ancestry speaks otherwise so maybe they see something in having him ....

Needs to be cleaned up this identifying garbage .........  Jesus - my uncle the copper once said I had legs like a Blackfulla - I must be one, eh?  Want me claim, bro............ where's my 44,000 sq km and $450m?
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Gnads
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 29288
Gender: male
Re: Stolen Generations say Australia doesn't accept it
Reply #25 - May 29th, 2023 at 10:31am
 
Brian Ross wrote on May 28th, 2023 at 2:54pm:
Gnads wrote on May 28th, 2023 at 2:44pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 28th, 2023 at 1:56pm:
Gnads wrote on May 28th, 2023 at 10:04am:
After "race" was removed from the Constitution in 1967.......dumbphucks like you & the Albanese Govt. want to re-insert "race" back into it.

Complete idiots.


"Race" wasn't removed from the Constitution in 1967.  It is still there.  When did you ever read the Australian Constitution?  I bet never.  Section III(XXV) still holds:

Quote:
25. Provisions as to races disqualified from voting

For the purposes of the last section, if by the law of any State all persons of any race are disqualified from voting at elections for the more numerous House of the Parliament of the State, then, in reckoning the number of the people of the State or of the Commonwealth, persons of that race resident in that State shall not be counted.

[Source]

What happened in 1967 was a change to the clause that stated the Commonwealth was to have no power over Indigenous Australians to have power over them:

Quote:
Section 51 (xxvi) was amended by the Constitution Alteration (Aboriginals) 1967, and previously read as follows:

"(xxvi) the people of any race, other than the aboriginal race in any State, for whom it is deemed necessary to make special laws;"


It now reads:

Quote:
Section 51 (xxvi)  the people of any race for whom it is deemed necessary to make special laws;

[Source]



It doesn't mention any specific race......it applies to all races

now you want a specific race to have a specific section applicable only to them enshrined back into the Constitution.

That's racist/exclusionary & divisive.

I stand by what I said about you.


You stated that the concept of "Race" had been removed from the Constitution, I proved that it had not.  Admit your error.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


Aboriginals were given the right to vote before the 1967 referendum...

in which sections of the Constitution were amended by removing certain wording thus Aboriginals were considered the same as any Australian citizen regarding inclusion in the census.(that removed the deferential of race)

Even QLD gave Aboriginal people the right to vote in 1965.

Quote:
Campaigning by FCAA and others led to the federal government establishing the House of Representatives Select Committee on Voting Rights of Aborigines in April 1961. The committee travelled widely throughout the country and interviewed 324 witnesses, almost half of whom were Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.

In its report, delivered late in 1961, the committee estimated that about 30,000 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people had been denied the vote as a result of discriminatory legislation in the Northern Territory, Western Australia and Queensland. It recommended that all Indigenous people be given the right to vote at federal elections.

The government responded by introducing a Bill ‘to give to Aboriginal Natives of Australia the right to Enrol and to Vote as Electors of the Commonwealth’.


Voting rights for Indigenous people enacted

The Commonwealth Electoral Act 1962 received assent on 21 May 1962.

It granted all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people the option to enrol and vote in federal elections.

Enrolment was not compulsory for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people,unlike other Australians. Once enrolled, however, voting was compulsory.

How the states and territories responded

Shortly after the federal government passed the 1962 Act, Western Australia and the Northern Territory granted Aboriginal people the right to vote.

Queensland established a committee to investigate ‘the promotion of the well-being of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders in Queensland’. Towards the end of 1965 the Queensland parliament passed an Act to extend voting rights to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.


Compulsory enrolment and voting for Indigenous Australians


It was not until 1984 that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people gained full equality with other electors under the Commonwealth Electoral Amendment Act 1983. This Act made enrolling to vote at federal elections compulsory for Indigenous Australians.


So from 1965(when QLD passed voting rights) up to 1984 all Aboriginal & TSI's had non compulsory enrolment & voting rights.

How was this a denial of full equality? They had more choice.

Today many Australians believe our system should be like the US one where enrolling & voting in elections is not compulsory.

Again I stand by my statement that Albosneses Morons & numpties like you want to reinstate an enshrined amendment to the Constitution which discriminates in favour of one race over all others.

It's a very divisive poor idea.
Back to top
 

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 83822
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: Stolen Generations say Australia doesn't accept it
Reply #26 - May 31st, 2023 at 7:30am
 
Unfortunately, it's far worse than that - most Australians don't give a rat's and a good 50% scratch their heads in lack of understanding of anything from the past here... being recent imports ...... blow-ins who get to vote .....
Back to top
 

absurdity_002.jpg (61 KB | 7 )
absurdity_002.jpg

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Gnads
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 29288
Gender: male
Re: Stolen Generations say Australia doesn't accept it
Reply #27 - May 31st, 2023 at 1:07pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on May 28th, 2023 at 7:51pm:
Gnads wrote on May 28th, 2023 at 2:44pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 28th, 2023 at 1:56pm:
Gnads wrote on May 28th, 2023 at 10:04am:
Brian Ross wrote on May 26th, 2023 at 8:55pm:
Gnads wrote on May 26th, 2023 at 6:06pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 26th, 2023 at 5:59pm:
Yet they complain all the time.  They were mistreated, raped and prevented from seeing their parents ever again.  The authorities could have provided them but as they were regarded as non-citizens they were treated like fauna.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


The same happened to white children made wards of the state.


Being a white child, removed to become "wards of the state" was very different compared to an Indigenous child who suffered the same fate.  The Indigenous children were denied any contact with their families, they were denied their culture, their religion, their essence of whom they were, where as that was not denied to White kids.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Quote:
And yes many of them were removed from homes because of neglect & poverty issues including not being able to support or sustain children.

Where's your empathy for them?


I have considerable empathy for them, where is your's you hard hearted old man?

Quote:
Were they not affected & traumatised because of what happened to them?

Why is it that it only matters if you were Aboriginal?


Indigenous kids were treated far worse than White kids.  Which would you have preferred to be, considering how you treat Indigenous people with your Racist attitudes.   Tsk, tsk, tsk...  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Quote:
Piss off you sanctimonious old cockroll.


Ad huminem insults ignored and treated with the contempt they deserve, Gnads.  They merely demonstrate your playground mentality.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes



Rubbish ... you patronising old fool. You definitely are a big part of the problem in always making it about race & having more excuses that Aboriginals should & have to be treated differently to any other Australian.

After "race" was removed from the Constitution in 1967.......dumbphucks like you & the Albanese Govt. want to re-insert "race" back into it.

Complete idiots.


"Race" wasn't removed from the Constitution in 1967.  It is still there.  When did you ever read the Australian Constitution?  I bet never.  Section III(XXV) still holds:

Quote:
25. Provisions as to races disqualified from voting

For the purposes of the last section, if by the law of any State all persons of any race are disqualified from voting at elections for the more numerous House of the Parliament of the State, then, in reckoning the number of the people of the State or of the Commonwealth, persons of that race resident in that State shall not be counted.

[Source]

What happened in 1967 was a change to the clause that stated the Commonwealth was to have no power over Indigenous Australians to have power over them:

Quote:
Section 51 (xxvi) was amended by the Constitution Alteration (Aboriginals) 1967, and previously read as follows:

"(xxvi) the people of any race, other than the aboriginal race in any State, for whom it is deemed necessary to make special laws;"


It now reads:

Quote:
Section 51 (xxvi)  the people of any race for whom it is deemed necessary to make special laws;

[Source]



It doesn't mention any specific race......it applies to all races


Which means there is still provision "on the issue of Race", now doesn't it?

Quote:
now you want a specific race to have a specific section applicable only to them enshrined back into the Constitution.


How do you know what I want?  I haven't expressed an opinion. It is, after all, a secret ballot, and one which should not be revealed to Racists like you.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Quote:
That's racist/exclusionary & divisive.

I stand by what I said about you.


And I stand by what I have said about you, too.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


Applicable to "all races" not just one.

Haven't expressed an opinion?

Then what have you been waffling/posting about?

Great response Bwyan Grin

No you didn't ... yes I did ...My father can wheel a wheel barrow faster than your father can.

numptykunt
Back to top
 

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais
 
IP Logged
 
Gnads
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 29288
Gender: male
Re: Stolen Generations say Australia doesn't accept it
Reply #28 - May 31st, 2023 at 1:10pm
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on May 31st, 2023 at 7:30am:
Unfortunately, it's far worse than that - most Australians don't give a rat's and a good 50% scratch their heads in lack of understanding of anything from the past here... being recent imports ...... blow-ins who get to vote .....



RE: your Sowell meme/jpeg

that's exactly what's happening.
Back to top
 

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 40938
Re: Stolen Generations say Australia doesn't accept it
Reply #29 - May 31st, 2023 at 1:41pm
 
Gnads wrote on May 31st, 2023 at 1:07pm:
Applicable to "all races" not just one.


Fine in theory but in practice?

Quote:
Haven't expressed an opinion?

Then what have you been waffling/posting about?

Great response Bwyan Grin

No you didn't ... yes I did ...My father can wheel a wheel barrow faster than your father can.

numptykunt
N

You seem to have real problems with a non-expression of opinion, don't you, Gnads?  Our electoral system is hidden votes and I stick to that.  My opinion is hidden from Racists like you.  Tough titties.  I generally support the ALP but not always, I have voted National, once or twice in the past.  I'll likely never vote Tories again after they lied to me.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Send Topic Print