Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
Grossly Inappropriate Victorian Jurisprudence? (Read 502 times)
AusGeoff
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Sage of Gippsland

Posts: 5999
Victoria
Gender: male
Grossly Inappropriate Victorian Jurisprudence?
Jun 27th, 2023 at 3:51am
 

How can it be that this arsewipe is not in jail, or at the
least held on remand?  In simple terms, he's guilty of
manslaughter.  What socially responsible judge would
grant him bail? 

https://www.9news.com.au/national/matthew-john-livingston-court-updates-mothers-...

Livingston applied his brakes only 0.9 seconds before 
he rear-ended the car in front of him, while his 43-
tonne truck was travelling at 86 km/h in a 40 km/h
roadworks zone.

                ...

I'm really sick of seeing soft-cock judges stupidly accept these
slimebag defence lawyers' fabricated excuses for their client's
antisocial, killer behaviour.

—Looking at the bloke, I wouldn't trust him with a bloody library book!

             Angry
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Lisa Jones
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 39047
Sydney
Gender: female
Re: Grossly Inappropriate Victorian Jurisprudence?
Reply #1 - Jun 27th, 2023 at 10:43am
 
OMG!!! From your link 👆

It was meant to be the start of an exciting new chapter in Simon Peckitt and Felicity Stewart's lives but instead their worlds were torn apart.
The couple and their two young daughters had spent the weekend house-hunting in central Victoria after deciding on a tree-change.

But as the family drove back to Melbourne on the Calder Freeway on December 6, 2021, a 43-tonne semitrailer crashed into the back of their Volkswagen.

Two-year-old Harriett, seated in the back seat, was killed instantly.

"She had the world in front of her," Stewart told the County Court.

"She was such a kind soul and brought so much joy to her parents, her sister and her wider family.

It's terribly unfair that her life was cut so terribly short."

The driver of the semitrailer, Matthew John Livingston, on Monday pleaded guilty to culpable driving causing Harriett's death.

Back to top
 

If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free.

HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415)
 
IP Logged
 
Lisa Jones
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 39047
Sydney
Gender: female
Re: Grossly Inappropriate Victorian Jurisprudence?
Reply #2 - Jun 27th, 2023 at 10:47am
 
He also admitted negligent driving causing serious injury to Peckitt and Stewart, as well as endangering 10 other people in the vicinity of the crash.

The court was told in the 400m before the crash site, there were several signs telling drivers to slow to 40km/h because of roadworks.

Livingston didn't hit the brakes until 0.91 seconds before the collision, striking the almost stationary Volkswagen at 86km/h.

The semitrailer then veered to the right, hitting a Toyota Hilux which rolled and trapped another driver for about two hours.

Three other cars were struck either by the Volkswagen or the Hilux, while several other motorists were forced to move their cars off the road to avoid being hit.

Felicity Stewart had to be airlifted to hospital where she spent several months undergoing treatment for a catastrophic brain injury and other fractures.


😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳
Back to top
 

If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free.

HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415)
 
IP Logged
 
Bias_2012
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 10740
Gender: male
Re: Grossly Inappropriate Victorian Jurisprudence?
Reply #3 - Jun 27th, 2023 at 12:02pm
 
For how long do you think his drivers license should be suspended for? ... your answer will indicate how guilty you think he is

Here's another complete moron who should lose his license forever, watch video ...

https://www.9news.com.au/national/sydney-driving-court-old-northern-road-glenori...

Back to top
 

Our Lives Are Governed By The Feast & Famine Variable
 
IP Logged
 
Captain Caveman
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6211
Gender: male
Re: Grossly Inappropriate Victorian Jurisprudence?
Reply #4 - Jun 27th, 2023 at 3:13pm
 
25yrs jail and never to hold a licence for anything again.
Your life should be so difficult to live that you cannot get social security either.
Wipe our hands of the prick.
Like the old days, banished to the wastelands.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Lisa Jones
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 39047
Sydney
Gender: female
Re: Grossly Inappropriate Victorian Jurisprudence?
Reply #5 - Jun 27th, 2023 at 4:59pm
 
Captain Caveman wrote on Jun 27th, 2023 at 3:13pm:
25yrs jail and never to hold a licence for anything again.
Your life should be so difficult to live that you cannot get social security either.
Wipe our hands of the prick.
Like the old days, banished to the wastelands.


25 yrs free bed and breakfast on the tax payer is a very    generous offer too.
Back to top
 

If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free.

HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415)
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 83784
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: Grossly Inappropriate Victorian Jurisprudence?
Reply #6 - Jun 27th, 2023 at 6:06pm
 
How is inappropriate Victorian jurisprudence news?
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Captain Caveman
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6211
Gender: male
Re: Grossly Inappropriate Victorian Jurisprudence?
Reply #7 - Jun 27th, 2023 at 9:12pm
 
Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 27th, 2023 at 4:59pm:
Captain Caveman wrote on Jun 27th, 2023 at 3:13pm:
25yrs jail and never to hold a licence for anything again.
Your life should be so difficult to live that you cannot get social security either.
Wipe our hands of the prick.
Like the old days, banished to the wastelands.


25 yrs free bed and breakfast on the tax payer is a very    generous offer too.



I'd happily pull the lever on the gallows, however we're not allowed to do that anymore.
So we have to send them to free bed and breakfast.
It does come with the inherent risk of being broken every day.
Child killers have a hard time in there.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
AusGeoff
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Sage of Gippsland

Posts: 5999
Victoria
Gender: male
Re: Grossly Inappropriate Victorian Jurisprudence?
Reply #8 - Jun 28th, 2023 at 4:04am
 
It's hard to predict his sentence under easy-going
Victorian laws, but as a guess I'd say 8 years, eligible
for parole in four or five years maybe.

Of course, it should be for life, with no chance of parole.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
aquascoot
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 34360
Gender: male
Re: Grossly Inappropriate Victorian Jurisprudence?
Reply #9 - Jun 28th, 2023 at 5:39am
 
Accidents due happen
Falling asleep at the wheel is not an evil ACT

I would come down with harsher sentences on youth in stolen cars who are deliberately speeding
I would also come down harder on people affected by drugs and alcohol

You would also want to look at his driving record

Any of us could probably fall asleep at the wheel
And 25 years is way too high

I would think a better sentence would be 2 years
And then perhaps to repay some karma
He could donate 20% off his wage in future years to a trust fund for the family
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48833
At my desk.
Re: Grossly Inappropriate Victorian Jurisprudence?
Reply #10 - Jun 28th, 2023 at 5:58am
 
I've nearly had this happen to me before, approaching roadworks. It was going down to one lane, and everyone was merging early for some reason. I was about to merge. Luckily there was already a gap opened up in the other lane. I had to swerve into it because a truck came up behind me at about 80 km/h. Not sure if the driver was half asleep, or just wanted to jump to the front of the queue.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Lisa Jones
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 39047
Sydney
Gender: female
Re: Grossly Inappropriate Victorian Jurisprudence?
Reply #11 - Jun 28th, 2023 at 8:23am
 
freediver wrote on Jun 28th, 2023 at 5:58am:
I've nearly had this happen to me before, approaching roadworks. It was going down to one lane, and everyone was merging early for some reason. I was about to merge. Luckily there was already a gap opened up in the other lane. I had to swerve into it because a truck came up behind me at about 80 km/h. Not sure if the driver was half asleep, or just wanted to jump to the front of the queue.


Here in Sydney everyone’s idea of “normal” is rushing around like they’re an hr late to get somewhere. Our motorways can and do function like racing car tracks at times 😩

What I do to cope with the ridiculous and congested traffic is essentially this: I allow space btwn myself and whatever is in front AND where possible...try and avoid buses and trucks. These are huge transport vehicles and as such probably can’t stop as easily so I need to factor that into my calculations for a safe trip.

I also try and avoid going anywhere near ute drivers, taxi cab drivers and Volvo drivers. Why? For whatever reason these drivers are hell bent on causing mayhem and/or accidents wherever they go.

I’ve been told many times that I’m a very good and a very safe driver. I believe my exemplary driving record exists mainly because I stay away from idiots. That and the fact that I’m not interested in NOR do I have time for ANY type of road accident.

Ultimately it’s the responsibility of ensuring the safety of the passengers inside the car I’m driving that weighs most heavily on my conscience. I take that responsibility very seriously. So defensive driving is my go to method (as outlined above).



Back to top
« Last Edit: Jun 28th, 2023 at 8:30am by Lisa Jones »  

If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free.

HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415)
 
IP Logged
 
AusGeoff
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Sage of Gippsland

Posts: 5999
Victoria
Gender: male
Re: Grossly Inappropriate Victorian Jurisprudence?
Reply #12 - Jun 30th, 2023 at 4:39pm
 
Truck driver Matthew Livingston was today handed a
12-and-a-half year prison sentence for a string of
driving charges, with prosecutors alleging he drifted
in and out of sleep in the lead-up to the crash.  He
was travelling at 86 km/h when he rear-ended the
first of six vehicles whilst in the 40 km/h construction
zone.

Livingston was also handed thousands of dollars in
fines for lesser charges related to professional
obligations as a heavy-vehicle driver, including for
missing required breaks.

Prosecutors previously said the driver had pulled 16-
hour days behind the wheel in the days prior to the
crash, and falsified logbooks.  An expert said the
crash was "very likely" to have been caused by sleep
deprivation.

Laughably, the soft-cock judge "conceded Livingston
was a decent man".  After destroying a whole family's 
lives?       I don't think so.      He's a total arsewipe.

The 44-year-old will be eligible for parole at the end
of 2031.  So effectively a mere EIGHT years for such
a bastard of a crime.     I hope the DPP appeals this
manifestly inadequate sentence.

Side note:  What did I say earlier?  "but as a guess I'd say 8 years".

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
AusGeoff
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Sage of Gippsland

Posts: 5999
Victoria
Gender: male
Re: Grossly Inappropriate Victorian Jurisprudence?
Reply #13 - Jul 1st, 2023 at 11:02am
 
aquascoot wrote on Jun 28th, 2023 at 5:39am:
Accidents due happen...

I agree; it's inevitable with millions of road kilometres
being traversed every day by heavy and high speed vehicles.

But this was NOT an accident;  it was an act of gross
negligence, plus the intentional breaking of two road
laws—an absence of mandatory rest breaks, and the
systematic falsifying of a log book.

aquascoot wrote on Jun 28th, 2023 at 5:39am:
Falling asleep at the wheel is not an evil ACT

Don't be silly mate.   Of course it was an act of "evil".
Livingston broke three laws, two of them with the
intent to commit a criminal act.

Intent precludes accidental.

aquascoot wrote on Jun 28th, 2023 at 5:39am:
Any of us could probably fall asleep at the wheel...

You may well (apparently, as you suggest) but in 58
years of driving I've never fallen asleep, nor have I
ever rear-ended someone when travelling at forty-six
km/h over the speed limit.     Nor have I ever killed
anybody on the roads.  It's an absurd position for you
to attempt to diminish the degree of Livingston's
culpability.

aquascoot wrote on Jun 28th, 2023 at 5:39am:
I would think a better sentence would be 2 years...

Well in that case, your thinking is faulty.


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Lisa Jones
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 39047
Sydney
Gender: female
Re: Grossly Inappropriate Victorian Jurisprudence?
Reply #14 - Jul 1st, 2023 at 11:15am
 
AusGeoff wrote on Jun 30th, 2023 at 4:39pm:
Truck driver Matthew Livingston was today handed a
12-and-a-half year prison sentence for a string of
driving charges, with prosecutors alleging he drifted
in and out of sleep in the lead-up to the crash.  He
was travelling at 86 km/h when he rear-ended the
first of six vehicles whilst in the 40 km/h construction
zone.

Livingston was also handed thousands of dollars in
fines for lesser charges related to professional
obligations as a heavy-vehicle driver, including for
missing required breaks.

Prosecutors previously said the driver had pulled 16-
hour days behind the wheel in the days prior to the
crash, and falsified logbooks.  An expert said the
crash was "very likely" to have been caused by sleep
deprivation.

Laughably, the soft-cock judge "conceded Livingston
was a decent man".  After destroying a whole family's 
lives?       I don't think so.      He's a total arsewipe.

The 44-year-old will be eligible for parole at the end
of 2031.  So effectively a mere EIGHT years for such
a bastard of a crime.     I hope the DPP appeals this
manifestly inadequate sentence.

Side note:  What did I say earlier?  "but as a guess I'd say 8 years".



Yep and you were correct too.

I personally thought the sentence was lenient. I anticipated/hoped the judge would have considered making an example of this incident by making the jail sentence a minimum of 10 years ALONG with a disqualification from driving ANY type of truck for life. Upon release he would need to get a new type of job. He’s clearly not fit to be a truck driver.
Back to top
 

If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free.

HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415)
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print