I still maintain your personal life will go on just the same, Grappler.

In any case, the current Constitution is flawed as it was founded on the concept of terra nullius, which denied recognition to the Indigenous owners of this land. The failure to acknowledge their rights has perpetuated historical injustices and social inequalities.

As we are aware, the doctrine of terra nullius was rightfully overturned in the landmark Mabo case, which recognized the existence of native title and the ongoing connection of Indigenous peoples to their traditional lands. This legal precedent provides strong justification for amending the Constitution to formally acknowledge and honor the traditional owners of Australia.

By recognizing Indigenous rights within the Constitution, we take a crucial step towards reconciliation and healing the wounds of the past. It sends a powerful message of respect, inclusivity, and acknowledgment of the First Nations' custodianship of this land for thousands of years.

Moreover, constitutional recognition can provide a framework for collaboration and consultation with Indigenous communities on important national matters, including policies affecting their lands, cultures, and well-being. A constitutionally enshrined Voice to Parliament, as proposed by many, would promote genuine dialogue and meaningful representation for Indigenous Australians in decision-making processes.

Just like in any household, where all members should have a say in decisions that affect them, it is reasonable and just for Indigenous Australians to be actively involved in shaping policies and decisions that impact their lives, communities, and culture. The establishment of the Voice to Parliament offers a genuine opportunity for reconciliation and represents a step towards building a more equitable and respectful nation.

Frank wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2023 at 8:32am:


100%!

Linus has appointed himself as our Voice. The blatant irony and hypocrisy of that ID knows no bounds.

Bias_2012 wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2023 at 10:54am:


Absolutely!

I know for a fact that hardly any Chinese (and they’re mainly left wingers) will be voting YES. In fact they can’t stand Albo now. They’re no fools! They know the Voice movement is REALLY about massive land grabs and massive handouts of money (which our Govt doesn’t have and will need to borrow).

I don’t think Albo will be around for long.

Linus wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2023 at 10:26am:


Yeah, but your cost of living and access to social services will disappear when indigenous people make land and money grabs and all those projects get scrapped because some indigenous people want to live a hippie lifestyle and block any progress that would boost the Australian economy. Because if the indigenous are incapable of dragging themselves out of the Stone Age, then they might as well drag the modern society into the Stone Ages, so that they don't look so bad by comparison.

Linus wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2023 at 11:11am:


I wouldn't worry about anything lisa says ..... soon she'll be calling you a sock

UnSubRocky wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2023 at 11:19am:


This seems to sum up the last two negative posts.

I understand that you may have concerns about the potential impact of recognizing Indigenous rights and establishing the Voice to Parliament.

However, it's crucial to avoid generalizations about Indigenous communities. It's important to remember that the goal of the Voice to Parliament is not about promoting a 'hippie lifestyle' or blocking progress but rather about recognizing the historical injustices faced by Indigenous Australians and providing them with a platform to have their voices heard.

The aim of constitutional recognition and the Voice to Parliament is to promote inclusivity, respect, and understanding while working towards a more equitable and just society. It does not seek to disadvantage or exclude anyone but rather to create opportunities for genuine dialogue, consultation, and collaboration.

Economic development and progress can indeed coexist with the recognition of Indigenous rights. In fact, research has shown that when Indigenous communities have a say in projects and policies that affect their lands, there is a greater likelihood of successful outcomes and sustainable development.

Linus wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2023 at 10:26am:


What do you make of Aborigines who are against the Voice in the Constitution? And prominent lawyers, public figures?

Nothing that virtually nobody opposes recognition in the Constitution, first proposed by Howard and Abbott.

Frank wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2023 at 11:41am:


Were you labouring under the misapprehension that Indigenous people were a homogenous blob?


Why shouldn't there be diversity of opinion amongst them?

I know from personal discourse, some are disgruntled that the Voice doesn't actually provide them with anything tangible.

Meanwhile you lot a screeching like your first borns are about to be taken from you.

Go figure.