philperth2010 wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2024 at 10:14am:


Obligation to provide relevant evidence... you ever heard of that?  Young Higgins didn't need much 'smearing' .... even the Eld Gel - a 'survivor' - says she is phoney - I've got a two bob watch here...

Higgins was treated with kid gloves - The Deuce got the sack .... Reynolds simply did not jump to conclusions and when asked provided supported evidence on what actually occurred.  Missy Higgins could have asked Reynolds for some evidence, too..... she didn't - which is telling.

Are you against the idea of including any ex-culpatory evidence?  I'm curious ....

Like sheep you are driven along by emotive terms and hyperbole... you hear what the media wants you to hear and you obey without thought....        

philperth2010 wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2024 at 2:51pm:


There you go again, ranting and raving and name-calling - Higgins' lawyer used a lot of emotive words but not much substance...  WTF are you raving on about?  Your 'court proceedings' read properly and without YOUR bias show that clearly.

Get a grip lad - you'll blow a gasket.... we all hope.  There is nothing wrong with Reynolds giving information to fill in parts of the case, when requested to do so.

Are you now saying that the only witnesses allowed and the only evidence allowed is for the accuser, or in the case of deuce's first civil action, only if it's for the defence?  A person has the right to ask for information and evidence and to see if what is given is of value to the case.

Would you equally say that Brittany Higgins was at fault for seeking views of people close to the events? Or for seeking support from all those lined up to give it free or at public expense?  Any comments there about bias and such?

What is WRONG with you, boy - apart from being abysmally stupid?

Keep up in class, lad....  YOU brought up the issue of Reynolds in the Leer Man case ...... I answered it... so let's try again - do you have a problem with an applicant to a court seeking corroboration and evidence that may help the case... or not?  You know - like Deuce did with Reynolds in his case... if she had relevant information or evidence he was well within his rights to ask for it .. nd she to give it.

Only in the emotion-driven and riddled minds of the  Luvvahs of Accusahs That Are Wimmen does anyone ever suggest that available evidence should not be polled...

so now your claim is that a man accused has no rights - but a woman accuser has all rights and more, including to crush his evidence out of existence with the connivance of the 'court'.

Think carefully about your answer, M Ballespetites - or you are coming with me....

We'll take that as a comment.

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 4^th, 2024 at 2:33pm:


The Higgins legal team only learned that Senator Reynolds was helping the defence of her alledged rapist during the trial through discovery....Senator Reynolds never offered any help to Ms Higgins after she was shipped off to Cash's office....Reynolds also referred Ms Higgins settlement to the Anti Crime Commission and leaked confidential details of the settlement to News Ltd journo....Sounds like Reynolds is a vindictive bitch who went out of her way to harrass Ms Higgins and you are a dickhead!!!

"The Higgins legal team only learned that Senator Reynolds was helping the defence of her alleged rapist during the trial through discovery




....Senator Reynolds never offered any help to Ms Higgins after she was shipped off to Cash's office....



Reynolds also referred Ms Higgins settlement to the Anti Crime Commission and leaked confidential details of the settlement to News Ltd journo" 



Now then - Young Brit and her Bruce clone husband David Sharkaz, are putting their paid for home in France up for sale to cover costs.  You should read some of the public comments about that and how happy many are out there in Australialand to hear that this is the case...

For something never proven in a court of law and having zero chance of ever being proven in such a court, since Young Brit destroyed evidence etc, and others did a very poor job...... this absolute non-event is certainly causing a lot of people a lot of pain.

Maybe you, you POS, need to get your head out of your arse and try to think for once.... and shut your foul mouth while you're at it. It's sheep like you who are dragging this country into the slimy ditches alongside the roads of civilisation.

... but there's more...  don't go away - stay glued to your seat ...

https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/australia/reynolds-lawyer-throws-spotlight-on-hig...

Everyone is ignoring the fact that Young Brit didn't make any complaint until later.... once again - at the initial interview which Young Brit entered knowing that Deuce had already been given his marching orders, the Senator offered to 'walk' her down to the AFP point in PH if there was anything she felt needed to be discussed with police... Young Brit refused and yet still got the Pussy Pass on keeping her job .... and then delayed making any complaint until her ideas had curdled enough or she was advised to do so.  Wonder by who??

This whole thing sucks.

P.S.  Told yez they put all the relevant news up in the middle of the night - by the time you dirt-holes get out of bed it's disappeared..... just like John Howard's comment that those dead Iraqi citizens died for a good cause in Desert Storm ... or that parachuting airman footage on Night One of the bombing campaign .... that guy is still missing and his wife has been paid out long ago.... but nobody was shot down officially.  Nearly landed on the falcon camera.