philperth2010 wrote on Sep 5^th, 2024 at 9:17am:



She didn't - she gave the benefit of doubt... Reynolds did not SAY she believed it implicitly - just that she accepted the possibility pending proof and asked Higgins if she had anything she wanted to discuss with the police next door or so.  Deuce was not sacked for being a rapist - he was sacked for a security breach, and Higgins was on the mat for the same breach.  You really must stop confusing things with one another.

At the time of that interview, her first opportunity to make that claim of rape, Higgins did not.  That story came later, after she'd had time to think about it or get advice from what increasingly appears to be a manipulative and scheming 'boyfriend' or similar.

Higgins accepted the legal right of the defendant to request information, and she gave it.  Had the accuser asked, I have no doubt she would have received the same level of attention..... Higgins/Lawyers did not ask Reynolds for any corroboration, but chose, rather, to try to use Reynolds as a stalking horse to muddy the waters of the case that never was.... make out that the only reason Higgins did not come forward at the outset and then actually destroyed evidence and later made **coughs** incorrect statements to police etc, was because she had been 'victimised' by Reynolds.  If someone had tried to stand over YOU in that way, what would be your response if you were genuinely aggrieved?  I'd be in front of the cameras in five minutes, not waging a war of words on social media to undermine.

Mark that word - CASE  that never was...nobody knows to this day whether or not the alleged event took place - but the CASE when presented was as thin as that old Ethiopian's whippett, and had no chance of success in any real court of Law (not law), and therefore the CASE did not exist other than in the mind of the accuser and those prepared to jump to conclusions and be lead by the nose like sheep.

How d'ya feel?

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 5^th, 2024 at 12:53pm:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 6^th, 2024 at 8:02am:

philperth2010 wrote on Sep 5^th, 2024 at 3:59pm:

Senator Reynolds never doubted or contradicted (Ms Higgins’ rape allegations)

???



Never attribute to malice what can be adequately explained by stupidity.
Unknown, Hanlon's Razor

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 6^th, 2024 at 9:09am:


Grappler always has the lowdown on every issue.

Doubt is one end of the line - belief is the other - saying you do not doubt does not automatically place you at the belief end....  reynolds offered Higgins every chance to make a statement early and even offered a walk down to the police office - Higgins said no.  Higgins' later assertions were never validated.

Stop pretending to be stupid.  I don't doubt that you are an idiot who cannot understand English ...  but until it is clearly proven that you are an idiot, I don't necessarily believe you are....

Now then - I suppose you think that Mayo's 'listen' meant 'hear and obey or be punished', rather than simply hearing what they have to say?

It's a cultural thing - in your case a lack of cultural thing.  No wonder the voice failed with mouths like that pushing for it... including you.

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 6^th, 2024 at 11:15am:


Post the statement by Reynolds you are relying on to claim she did in fact not mean this when Reynolds said....Senator Reynolds

never doubted or contradicted

(Ms Higgins’ rape allegations)....The onus is on you to present the statement Reynolds made to contradict this statement....Over to you dickhead???