Gordon wrote on Oct 26^th, 2023 at 8:37pm:


Sounds all very sleazy.  Looks like Bwucie was hanging out at a strip joint, she arrives, gets pissed.....ooops....where have IO heard this before......so pissed she nods off while Bwucie is on the job without the condom she wanted.  She wakes and there is Bwucie on top....on the job.......where have I heard that before???????

And this happens while the allegations (of remarkably similar basic circumstances) aired by Higgins against him were only weeks old and would be at the top of mind of any bloke with half a neuron.

I wonder if he was careless and admitted (in ignorance of the Law) she wanted him to put on a condom and that he did not, despite her want.

In the absence of such an admission, I doubt he will be convicted on the facts as set out in that link......other than perhaps it might be argued so she was so pissed as to be incapable of providing meaningful consent.

Dear oh dear......Bwucie and grossly pissed women, ey?

Who'd a thunk such a nice bloke seems only able to get his rocks off with drunk as a skunk women, ey?

What a grub, no matter how you look at it.

Aussie wrote on Oct 26^th, 2023 at 4:40pm:

Yes there is, and it's a pretty obvious one currently.

Both women have each made accusations that Lehrmann
raped them, but at this point there is no evidence supporting
either claim, nor has either claim been tested in a court of law.

I also note that both Gordon and Aussie have seemingly made
up some sort of nonsensical sexual fantasies in their own minds,
without any accord with current evidence, or the more noticeable
lack thereof for the two rape accusations.

Aussie wrote on Oct 26^th, 2023 at 11:33pm:

I checked Gordon's link, but couldn't find any "facts"
either confirming or denying the allegations made
against Lehrmann.

I think at this stage, any confirmed facts of either
case must be regarded as unknown.  Unfortunately,
we're undoubtedly gonna see yet another 'trial by
media' with this second rape allegation.

At this point, I have to admit to sitting on the fence
for both women's allegations of rape.

AusGeoff wrote on Oct 27^th, 2023 at 12:12am:



The pertinent bits.

After socialising and drinking with friends, she moved to a second venue, an adult entertainment venue called The Vault.

While attending that venue, police allege the woman drank more alcohol before meeting Mr Lehrmann, who introduced himself as “Bryce”.
Police further allege that the woman later agreed to get in a taxi with him to his friend’s house, where she got into bed with him and later fell asleep while kissing him.
The police will allege that Mr Lehrmann was not wearing a condom and told the woman they had sex numerous times, and that he had ejaculated inside of her, but that she had no recollections of this.
Police will allege the woman told Mr Lehrmann she needed to get the “morning after” pill and that he agreed to take her to a chemist.
The woman and the accused then left the property in a farm ute to attend a chemist.

After visiting the chemist, police allege she asked Mr Lehrmann take her home and he stopped off at McDonald’s on the way.

During the following week she exchanged messages with him on Snapchat, where she noticed his Snapchat name was BruceEmery. Emery is Mr Lehrmann’s middle name.

Woman claims she recognised Mr Lehrmann from Google search

It is further understood that police will allege the complainant was speaking to a friend’s mother about the Brittany Higgins case.

The complainant is alleged to have then conducted an internet search on her phone for “Brittany Higgins rapist”.

Gordon wrote on Oct 27^th, 2023 at 9:56am:


You left out a most pertinent bit:

Quote:

Jasin wrote on Oct 27^th, 2023 at 10:29am:


I know you think you're making sense but ....

How is any woman 'being ripped to pieces' here?  What is at question is why the name of an accused is published but the name of the accuser is not.  Social niceties?  'Sensitivities' over the type of allegation?  Who GAF who roots who these days?  why should a woman receive special treatment over shagging?  Bit outdated, even for you retards, don't you think?

And as for St Brittany - all that is being said is that the real evidence does not stack up..... and shows a completely different story from her original.... she changed her story and made 'errors' in 'recollection' which did not reflect her original statement.... and her case was flimsdy at best - how is that 'being ripped to pieces' - truth does no ripping?  You punished Poor Bruce for similar accusations of tampering with his story etc....

It's called OOPS!  But my god how the money rolled in!!

You have a problem with that?

Why don't you just get yourself elected and then dictate to everyone how they will think, mothra?  You could pose as the fearless defender of the poofs, the trannies, the ethnics, the Cheers, the Pallies .. and.. oh ... the women.... all poor victims  ... and set about stamping out the New Jews here ...but that position is reserved for the Future PM Higgins.... Thorpe is just a poor reflection of that kind of attempt at grabbing a fat seat for life... following Hitler's path to riches.

Quote:


Ah, I see.  There is my problem. I never knew that rape was merely just a 'shag.'

My bad.