Documents show other Lehrmann allegations

A man accused of raping Brittany Higgins in Parliament House was the subject of multiple sexual assault and harassment allegations, with other women reporting their own complaints after the political staffer's claim.

The reports which were previously kept under wraps by a court were on Friday made public along with Bruce Lehrmann's attempts to prevent his criminal trial going ahead.

Here you go Aussie!!!

Quote:




https://www.northweststar.com.au/story/8005770/documents-show-other-lehrmann-all...

https://www.jimboombatimes.com.au/story/7942256/court-hears-lehrmanns-conflictin...

Accusations are a dime a dozen - we must never fall into the trap of finding a person guilty on accusation because the accuser belongs to some specified social group.

If an Indigenous wishes to claim massacre, for instance, they'd best be ready with a heap of hard evidence.....

Busy elsewhere - and those are the defenders of truth - not of Lehrmann.

You call yourself a lawyer... second childhood, Aussie?

Is this the same guy or not?  Anyone?

Where have all the Lehrmann defenders gone...'long time passing, where have all the Lehrmann's gone?'

Aussie wrote on Aug 6^th, 2023 at 4:59pm:


Plenty of people with my name - is it the same guy?  How do you know?  Pretty simple......

Second woman comes forward alleging she was sexually assaulted by same perpetrator as Brittany Higgins

Third woman alleges she was sexually assaulted by the same man accused of raping Brittany Higgins

Of course it's the same guy, you absolute moron.

Aussie wrote on Aug 4^th, 2023 at 1:26pm:



Ohhhhh......   Arrsie!!!!....... Soooo excitement!

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Aug 7^th, 2023 at 2:03pm:


It is exactly the same name including the very odd second Christian name, Emery.

The initial reports said the person had family connections in Toowoomba (Lehrmann does...his Mother lives there, or did at the relevant time.)  Lehrmann also schooled in Toowoomba.

The same reports described the bloke as high profile....well, Lehrmann fits that bill too.

It is the same Goose, Grappler.  Deal with that fact.

Frank wrote on Aug 7^th, 2023 at 3:30pm:


You think people will be excited about a repeat sexual offender?

Nope, I had him nailed from day one, when he first "appeared."  He was then roasted by the Beak for having the gall to appear by phone without the Beak's prior approval, pleading a frail state of mind at the time.

You don't suspect he was malingering so as to avoid cameras do you Grappler?

Unless there are two guys with exactly the same name etc......

Frank wrote on Aug 7^th, 2023 at 6:54pm:


Ima not in Twitter.  Could never figure out how it works, so did not bother.

A nothing burger today.  The thing resumes on August 23rd when we should know more about this bizarre request for phone records of the alleged victim, even though it appears to be common ground that alleged perp and alleged victim did not know each other prior to the alleged offences occurring.

Link.

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Aug 7^th, 2023 at 4:47pm:


Nope, I had him nailed from day one, when he first "appeared."  He was then roasted by the Beak for having the gall to appear by phone without the Beak's prior approval, pleading a frail state of mind at the time.

You don't suspect he was malingering so as to avoid cameras do you Grappler?

Ooooo.....looks like his name might come out earlier than at first thought.  All the rest is legal fuaroo which seems pretty unproductive to me, but whatever.

Back in Court on 20th September.

Link.

So, the Law changed today and in a few days, it will be legal in Queensland to name a person charged with rape from the moment of charge.  Currently, it can only happen after that person has been committed for Trial, meaning a Magistrate has made a determination that a prima facie case has been made out.

I disagree with the change as the current position did appropriately protect people accused on flimsy evidence, provided the Cops have charged.  Way too much power thus is in the hands of an accuser and dumb Cops.

However, you can thus expect this bloke's name to be lawfully out there very soon.

It looks like the mystery man (let's call him Bruce) won't be named. A court order has been granted to prevent publication of his name...

Justice Peter Applegarth, in his three-page decision, said that without a temporary order the man's right to have a non-publication order argument heard and determined would be "an empty, theoretical or useless right".

It is the first high-profile test of the new law, which comes into effect just after 12am on Tuesday.

Justice Applegarth said that the man's legal team intends to apply for an order, under the new law, for his identity to remain suppressed, and it will do so as soon as practicable after the legislation comes into effect early Tuesday.

Under the previous legislation, identification of a person charged with rape was prohibited until they had gone through a committal hearing. That was scrapped on September 13 when the new laws went through parliament and came into effect on October 3.

Justice Applegarth said that without a temporary order today, media reports could identify the man any time after 12am on Tuesday.

"His statutory right to apply for an order … would be rendered nugatory and the application would have no utility," Justice Applegarth said.

The Queensland Police Service did not oppose an interim injunction. Justice Applegarth said it would be "contrary to the interests of justice" if the man was named before being given an opportunity to lodge an application.

"Without a temporary order today, the purpose of making the application would be defeated. The interests of justice, and the balance of convenience, are served by not rendering the statutory right that the applicant will gain early on Tuesday morning, an empty, theoretical or useless right," Justice Applegarth said.

Let's wait and see IF it's going to be argued.... the rights of the defendant at the time may hold sway.

Personally I think both accused and accuser should remain unnamed until the hearing is finished - and only revealed if a finding of guilty is made.  Otherwise it stick to the defendant for life regardless of outcome and facts.

Queensland, of course, is happy to turn back the clocks to the Dark Ages under a Labor government...

https://au.yahoo.com/news/high-profile-rape-accused-keep-025100117.html

This is starting to sound very much like Humpty Trumpty and his bullshit.

The bloke's Lawyers pissing off the Judge who gave them short shrift and an invitation to see you on the 26th October, 2023, with or without Hoare.

Link.

Bruce Lehrmann named as man charged with alleged rape of woman in Toowoomba

Quote:




https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-10-26/bruce-lehrmann-toowoomba-court-rape-charg...

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 26^th, 2023 at 5:36pm:


Grappler, one of the cardinal sins around these parts is to alter a Member's post (in a material way surreptitiously) as you have done.  You have changed the link in your Post.

F off.

Grappler...the Link I posted in Post # 71....i NOT the link you quoted in Post # 75.

It has been changed.

Anyone/everyone can see that.

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 26^th, 2023 at 5:36pm:


Grappler, one of the cardinal sins around these parts is to alter a Member's post (in a material way surreptitiously) as you have done.  You have changed the link in your Post.

F off.

Grappler, this is the Headline in the Link I posted in Post # 71.

Quote:

So he took her home, rooted her all night, took her to the chemist for a morning after pill then Maccas, spoke to him on Snapchat for a week then realised he was the guy in the Higgins case and then decided she was raped.

Is Bruce a rapist or a looser who can only get laid by getting chicks drunk first?

https://www.news.com.au/national/queensland/courts-law/bruce-lehrmann-met-toowoo...

Aussie wrote on Oct 26^th, 2023 at 8:00pm:


... and here is the headline in the post I responded to - the headline YOU posted:-

"https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-10-17/qld-high-profile-man-not-named-toowoomba-rape-charge/102986754"

Go and press the button on your own post.  Now enough of this nonsense - admit you made a mistake and leave it alone.

So he took her home, rooted her all night, took her to the chemist for a morning after pill then Maccas, spoke to him on Snapchat for a week then realised he was the guy in the Higgins case and then decided she was raped.

Is Bruce a rapist or a looser who can only get laid by getting chicks drunk first?

https://www.news.com.au/national/queensland/courts-law/bruce-lehrmann-met-toowoo...

Gee.....I wonder if there is any similarity between the two cases?

...Gordon posted a Link up there ^^^^^ which sets out some of the facts, allegedly.

Aussie wrote on Oct 26^th, 2023 at 11:33pm:

I checked Gordon's link, but couldn't find any "facts"
either confirming or denying the allegations made
against Lehrmann.

I think at this stage, any confirmed facts of either
case must be regarded as unknown.  Unfortunately,
we're undoubtedly gonna see yet another 'trial by
media' with this second rape allegation.

At this point, I have to admit to sitting on the fence
for both women's allegations of rape.

AusGeoff wrote on Oct 27^th, 2023 at 12:12am:



The pertinent bits.

After socialising and drinking with friends, she moved to a second venue, an adult entertainment venue called The Vault.

While attending that venue, police allege the woman drank more alcohol before meeting Mr Lehrmann, who introduced himself as “Bryce”.
Police further allege that the woman later agreed to get in a taxi with him to his friend’s house, where she got into bed with him and later fell asleep while kissing him.
The police will allege that Mr Lehrmann was not wearing a condom and told the woman they had sex numerous times, and that he had ejaculated inside of her, but that she had no recollections of this.
Police will allege the woman told Mr Lehrmann she needed to get the “morning after” pill and that he agreed to take her to a chemist.
The woman and the accused then left the property in a farm ute to attend a chemist.

After visiting the chemist, police allege she asked Mr Lehrmann take her home and he stopped off at McDonald’s on the way.

During the following week she exchanged messages with him on Snapchat, where she noticed his Snapchat name was BruceEmery. Emery is Mr Lehrmann’s middle name.

Woman claims she recognised Mr Lehrmann from Google search

It is further understood that police will allege the complainant was speaking to a friend’s mother about the Brittany Higgins case.

The complainant is alleged to have then conducted an internet search on her phone for “Brittany Higgins rapist”.

Police will allege the woman told Mr Lehrmann to put a condom on, but that the next thing she remembered was waking up with the accused on top of her.

The police will allege that Mr Lehrmann was not wearing a condom and told the woman they had sex numerous times, and that he had ejaculated inside of her, but that she had no recollections of this.

Failing to wear a condom without a partner’s permission is considered sexual assault under Queensland law.

mothra wrote on Oct 27^th, 2023 at 6:48am:


I hear that men in knitting classes suffer the same bias fate.
So what's your problem woman!?

How is any woman 'being ripped to pieces' here?  What is at question is why the name of an accused is published but the name of the accuser is not.  Social niceties?  'Sensitivities' over the type of allegation?  Who GAF who roots who these days?  why should a woman receive special treatment over shagging?  Bit outdated, even for you retards, don't you think?

Quote:


Ah, I see.  There is my problem. I never knew that rape was merely just a 'shag.'

My bad.