Lee has been consistently citing scientific evidence debunking the tendentious agit-prop.

Juvenile Wanker, on the other hand, having no reasoned counter-arguments and being unable to resist the tendentious political agit-prop, cites whatever he can find in support of it.

Lee thinks anthropogenic CO2 does not drive the climate. I agree.

Wankers thinks anthropogenic CO2 is the Lord of Trace Gasses that Rules Them All. Silly. No amount of reasoning or evidence will ever sway a wanker so invested in dogma.

lee wrote on Aug 6^th, 2023 at 9:01pm:


Poor lee. Remember the spectrum of far IR at top of atmosphere? LOTS of energy missing at the emission lines of CO2, methane etc wasn’t there?

Poor lee, so eager to think AGW, and the change it would bring, wasn’t real he swallowed nonsense about convection in the troposphere would cool the atmosphere, that molecules colliding together would destroy energy.

Such desperation!

Why not have a look at: https://history.aip.org/climate/index.htm and learning a bit about AGW science?

Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 6^th, 2023 at 9:34pm:

Oh?! The Bbwianesque argument from 'but I went to uni!'




Pal, I KNOW how unis and academia work. I have been an insider for decades.
Most of the climate argument is not about physics but politics. Even you know that.

Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 6^th, 2023 at 9:38pm:


So tell us exactly when CO2 and methane weren't there. CO2 and methane have always been there. They are naturally occurring compounds.

lee wrote on Aug 6^th, 2023 at 9:01pm:


You didn't cite the paper. 

Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 6^th, 2023 at 9:38pm:


I did at the main page. If you had searched, you would have found papers about convective cooling.