MeisterEckhart wrote on Aug 28
th, 2023 at 12:55pm:
Lisa Jones wrote on Aug 28
th, 2023 at 12:14pm:
MeisterEckhart wrote on Aug 28
th, 2023 at 12:08pm:
Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 28
th, 2023 at 11:38am:
Re the hysteria by Larry:
According to Aussie the PO has not replied to his request for info and likely will not bother doing so. Nobody thus knows of the status or results of that investigation or whether it exists at all. So he has been throwing totally unfounded insults at me all morning.
AusPost cannot initiate an investigation as there is no way of determining that it received the letter, let alone concede that it has been lost or stolen.
When you register a letter and it does not arrive at its destination, Auspost will offer a payment of up to $100 to cover the loss, or more if you have paid for extra insurance.
FMD not only are you a Dumbarse Multi Troll you’re also a serious autistic and ignorant tosspot!
Australia Post DID initiate and conduct an investigation because they keep records of all post that it holds for collection! These records involve a register and the register states who the sender is, who the recipient is and it even describes the actual envelope in terms of size and weight. Now log off with that fake ID and come back with one of your other ID’s. Idiot! Do the terms lost, or stolen, in transit mean anything to you? That's if the letter was sent in the first place.
The point to registering a letter is that its Q-code/barcode is scanned at intermittent points prior to delivery, making its delivery progress traceable.
If an envelope containing cash was mailed to a cartel post office to await collection then upon arrival it DOES get registered.
Monk chose to send cash notes in an envelope which is illegal AND of course high risk.
Aussie didn’t choose this ridiculous method.
Aussie definitely doesn’t have that envelope because it never arrived at said Post Office TO be registered and placed in “awaiting collection”. There IS NO RECORD of said envelope’s existence even and certainly not under the sender‘s name OR receiver’s name. These were looked up separately. In addition all records for the month Monk alleges he sent that envelope of cash were looked at to check for similar sounding names (as well as a few other names which relate to real life identification).
Nothing.
I know Aussie is telling the truth in that he doesn’t have his own money back. Australia Post confirms that Aussie could not have received it as it was never on their register nor has it been signed off after being received.
That leaves us with the 80 yr old Demented lying Drunk who CHOSE to send cash (which is both illegal and unsafe).
It’s not Aussie’s fault that he didn’t get his own money back. It’s Drunk’s! Drunk chose the method. Aussie was TOLD that was the method. And that’s why Drunk STILL owes Aussie his own $60.
As has been posted over a thousand times already ...Drunk could have sorted this out via e gift voucher. In under 60 seconds!
It is not illegal to send small amounts of cash in the post. It is discouraged.
Also, AusPost cannot know what is in a sealed envelope as they are not authorised to open a letter - only state/federal police or ABF are authorised to do that.
You cannot know what Aussie did or didn't receive... Unless Aussie is Reggie.
Forum
Pages: 
Has the money stolen by Drunk yet been recovered? (Read 18707 times)
