Check it out.
https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/australia/stunning-map-shows-the-extent-of-native...

Seems the withdrawal of British and American cultural presence here is giving back the continent to the Aborigines.
The 'West' doesn't belong here and has only existed here as a detached entity.

Wonder who will then take Australia, if Politics (the West) won't/can't?

At first it was just isolated areas that nobody really noticed and it was mostly unheralded.... now it is more and more becoming the primest land in the country.... and all brought to you by your nut-licking governments of all colours... the ones who lost their balls decades ago to favour the pussy vote.... and licked their nuts instead....



And thus the Western Beowulf, having lain down with the Demon Feminista, found himself and humanity trapped for decades and even generations into dealing daily with the bastard offspring of that unholy union..... yea - e'en unto the seventh generation..... and still climbing....  talk about stupid and bought out for a transient piece of pussy ....

Policy Statement:- No hunter gatherer group is able to lay claim to a vast swathe of land for the simple reason that they never occupied more than a tiny patch at any given time and therefore could not be considered to have 'squatter's rights' or any other rights of ownership.  They should only be claiming the specific area at which they halted when brought into contact with civilisation, and permitted sufficient land to establish themselves, build homes etc.

Mabo has no bearing on wandering hunter-gatherer groups, and that decision was made in the context of a clearly defined space  isolated from the mainland and continually occupied by one group for generations - something which clearly does not apply to wandering across a huge expanse of land.  To surrender to the concept of hunter-gatherer ownership of all the old hunting grounds - which were malleable given that other tribes would compete with them for it - is to apply a system of law foreign to the modern system and is totally out of date.

For example - there is/was no continuous occupation by any such small group of Goat Island or Garden Island and so forth -which were occupied directly by the British Empire and then Commonwealth for many decades and were in direct use.

The same applies to Mt Warning and all other national parks.

You call them 'primitive'.
And yet they rip you dumb white fu*ckers off blind in so many ways.

It could have been a lot worse.

There was no reason to imagine in the mid to late 18th century that Australia would become a single nation.

There was every reason to suppose that the French, Dutch and British would carve up the continent among themselves - similar to what the Spanish and Portuguese did in South America.

Had that been the case, Aboriginal peoples would have been taking on at least 3 dominant world powers.

And, given that Dutch possessions were seized by the Indonesians, it could have also been Indonesia that determined the fate of many Aboriginal peoples - a Papua-New Guinea/East Timor situation writ large.

And if the Chinese had secured territory in Australia...

Jasin wrote on Sep 15^th, 2023 at 9:55am:


That is not going to happen.  We have to be realistic.

Frank wrote on Sep 15^th, 2023 at 10:55am:

To be treated like equals. 

When the colonialist first came to Australia.  The Aborigines were driven off their land.  And their lands were then given or sold off to other settlers for a very small fee, or in a lot of cases free.   These lands would then become privately owned, and the owners of the land can freely discriminate against Aborigines. 

And now, people like you crying and whining about native titles.   

tickleandrose wrote on Sep 15^th, 2023 at 11:14am:

How do you think Aboriginal peoples are not treated as equals under the law?