chimera wrote on Sep 26
th, 2023 at 7:54pm:
'Blocking the confused "rights" ideology emanating from the West's "freedom values" delusion'.
That's getting back to the merits of a right, which is off the theme of inalienable, permanent protections of humans.
1. We both agree
inalieable natural rights don't exist, though many think they do. Hence the confusion even at the level of the UN.
2. The UNUDHR certainly addresses well-being and security for ALL humans, in a world "free from the scourge of war". Meritorious rights?
Quote:A right to a home is not enforceable, people don't leave school and sit on the footpath until a home appears there.
Many people are reduced to building their own substanded housing - or living in tents - even in the world's cities; a consequence of the failure of governments following mainstream neoclassical orthodoxy.
Once again, regardless of "rights", it's obviously desirable that the entire population is decently housed.
Quote:They don't wait outside the king's fortified stronghold so he can construct a parliament for them. But a tyrant can easily bomb homes and parliament into rubble.
Looking back at history; and Charles isn't responsible for the homelessness in the UK today.
As for "tyrants": Putin is rendered insane by tribalist "national sovereignty" ideology, even though Russia is already the biggest country in the world by far. He could have invited all Russians living in Ukraine back to Russia, and avoided what will be a catastrophe for both countries.
As for Taiwan; Chinese people live there, they want to secede from China, on the basis of the "freedom values" delusion. Provided the US - currently the 'global policeman(!) - doesn't declare Taiwan independent, Xi can leave the separatist Taiwanese clowns alone for the time being, without bombing them.