freediver wrote on Oct 9
th, 2023 at 5:01pm:
Quote:Off the top of my head, yes; but this in one of the world's newest democracies at the time, shattering your illusion of "shared belief" in "inter-subjective reality".
Again, you are confused. Most people have never heard of intersubjective reality, so it would be hard for them to believe in it.
Fraudiver, the depths of your fraudulence are
unfathomable, even to me who understands your delusions which are based on illusions.
I asked for some examples of 'alienable rights', you obfuscated with a description of what rights are, namely,
"inter-subjective reality" in association with "shared belief".
Now you are saying I am confused because "most people have never heard of intersubjective reality, so it would be hard for them to believe in it."
Fair dinkum, how low can a fraud go: the issue is
belief in "inalienable rights", NOT belief in "inter-subjective reality" ...which indeed few have heard of, and which you insisted I google, to find out what the term means (which I did, finding a definition you agreed with).
Quote:TGD
Democracy hadn't existed in most of the world up to the US constitution (1789), and most of Europe up to 1918 since classical Athen's demise , so it's a big call to even identify a war between a "democracy" and ANY other nation
...
How many wars have there been since 1789?
Maybe low IQ is part of your problem as well ideological blindness. The issue is not how many wars have been fought since 1789, but how many democracies have existed to be involved in wars.
Numerous wars have been fought, while so few democracies have existed to engage in war; meanwhile, one of the newest democracies since 1789
(indeed, since classical Athens) made war against itself, 6 decades after its establishment!All courtesy of the ideological catastrophe based on your illusionary 'inalienable rights'.